Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Is Time Travel (going backwards) Possible?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morrus" data-source="post: 6041804" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>This is a good summation of all those paragraphs. I disagree for the following reasons:</p><p> </p><p>1) You are levelling your accusations at "scientists". Those studying dark matter are a tiny, tiny, tiny percentage of scientists.</p><p> </p><p>2) Describing that process as "picking the most popular one and stick to it" is insulting to them and utterly inaccurate.</p><p> </p><p>As far as I can tell your definition of "close minded" is "an expert who doesn't agree with (the non-expert) KarinsDad on how to conduct research of galactic rotation". Which is a definition, I suppose, but not one that I would ever care to use.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Okay, okay. How many scientist do you <em>know</em>? Let's have a list of examples. Science is a big, big area - let's have a dozen major theories which are being inadequately and incorrectly researched in your opinion. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>No scientist has ever claimed to understand dark energy. This is a complete strawman and a misleading line of thought.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>This is the OPPOSITE to what you've been saying. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Jeezooos holy mofo, man! So we've progressed from accusations that scientists are narrow-minded, through dishonesty, claims that it is they who are holding scientists back (as opposed to... ice cream salesmen who are progressing it? Who?) to.... now <strong>scientists are doing <em>shoddy science</em>?</strong></p><p> </p><p>Really?</p><p> </p><p>Based on<em> your opinion</em> of how they should be conducting this science, you deem it shoddy? You, who admits he <em>doesn't understand it</em>?</p><p> </p><p>Do you really, honestly not see the problem here?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morrus, post: 6041804, member: 1"] This is a good summation of all those paragraphs. I disagree for the following reasons: 1) You are levelling your accusations at "scientists". Those studying dark matter are a tiny, tiny, tiny percentage of scientists. 2) Describing that process as "picking the most popular one and stick to it" is insulting to them and utterly inaccurate. As far as I can tell your definition of "close minded" is "an expert who doesn't agree with (the non-expert) KarinsDad on how to conduct research of galactic rotation". Which is a definition, I suppose, but not one that I would ever care to use. Okay, okay. How many scientist do you [I]know[/I]? Let's have a list of examples. Science is a big, big area - let's have a dozen major theories which are being inadequately and incorrectly researched in your opinion. No scientist has ever claimed to understand dark energy. This is a complete strawman and a misleading line of thought. This is the OPPOSITE to what you've been saying. Jeezooos holy mofo, man! So we've progressed from accusations that scientists are narrow-minded, through dishonesty, claims that it is they who are holding scientists back (as opposed to... ice cream salesmen who are progressing it? Who?) to.... now [B]scientists are doing [I]shoddy science[/I]?[/B] Really? Based on[I] your opinion[/I] of how they should be conducting this science, you deem it shoddy? You, who admits he [I]doesn't understand it[/I]? Do you really, honestly not see the problem here? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Is Time Travel (going backwards) Possible?
Top