Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
It's a Good Thing D&D Isn't a Toy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="talien" data-source="post: 7773292" data-attributes="member: 3285"><p>We've previously discussed a time when Dungeons & Dragons was considered <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?5416-When-D-D-Was-a-Toy" target="_blank">as much of a toy as it was a book</a>. The loss of D&D in toy stores was a blow to a hobby that <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?3457-Who-Was-D-D-Meant-For" target="_blank">found its footing</a> among a younger generation. Now things have come full circle as the bottom of the toy market fell out from under Wizards of the Coast's parent company, Hasbro.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH]104942[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center">Photo <a href="https://pixabay.com/en/lego-dragon-legoland-toys-built-3610646/" target="_blank">courtesy of Pixabay</a>.</p><p>[h=3]Toys vs. Books[/h]We <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?5416-When-D-D-Was-a-Toy" target="_blank">discussed previously</a> how D&D wasn't just classified as a toy in some markets, but produced its own toy lines as well. D&D was carried in toy stores in the early 80s. The game's success in those markets was due in part to Dr. Eric J. Holmes' Basic version of D&D, which streamlined the rules and <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?3457-Who-Was-D-D-Meant-For" target="_blank">made them more accessible to a younger audience</a>. </p><p></p><p>But D&D was as much of a toy as it was a book, and bookstores carried the game too...<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?481405-What-Will-Become-of-the-FLGS" target="_blank">until they didn't</a>. Unlike the toy market, the book trade often carries a return policy. Random House stopped fronting then-D&D owner TSR's loans against book sales in 1996 and returned a third of TSR's products -- several million dollars' worth. That accumulated debt sunk the company, only to be rescued by Wizards of the Coast. </p><p></p><p>Things came full circle when Wizards of the Coast (WOTC) was purchased by Hasbro. WOTC has continued to shepherd the D&D brand, which for years labored in the shadow of WOTC's other major game brand, the much more successful Magic: The Gathering card game. That all changed in the past few years.</p><p>[h=3]Roleplaying vs. Card Games[/h]The tension between D&D and Magic goes back years, with <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?3006-Where-Has-the-Magic-Gone" target="_blank">several failed attempts to cross-pollinate the two brands</a>. It's also emblematic of two different markets: Magic, with a smaller physical footprint, can be sold everywhere from book stores to the big box franchises like Target in the U.S.; <strong>Dungeons & Dragons</strong> left both the book and toy store market behind to focus on sales through hobby store and the Internet. Thanks to WOTC's new CEO, <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?488519-D-amp-D-CEOs-The-Wizards-of-the-Coast-Years" target="_blank">Chris Cocks</a>, the two brands have finally managed to produce joint efforts like <strong>The Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica</strong>. </p><p></p><p>Beyond a D&D product, Magic's digital efforts with <strong>Magic: The Gathering Arena </strong>have blazed a path for <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4681-Could-D-D-Ever-Have-an-eSport" target="_blank">D&D esports</a>, which Hasbro CEO Brian Goldner <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?525581-A-New-Digital-Direction-for-Wizards" target="_blank">breathlessly reported</a> (and then retracted). It's clear that Cocks isn't playing favorites and sees both brands as fertile intellectual property beyond the original play spaces that spawned them. That's good news for Hasbro, because the market recently bottomed out of places that carry much of their product. </p><p>[h=3]Toys Aren't Us[/h]Toys R Us' collapse has sent shock waves through the industry, but it was a tsunami for the two major toy producers, Hasbro and Mattel. Toys R Us accounted for 10% of Hasbro's sales. Brian Goldner <a href="https://seekingalpha.com/article/4239553-hasbro-inc-ceo-brian-goldner-q4-2018-results-earnings-call-transcript?part=single" target="_blank">explained on the Q4 investor call</a>: </p><p></p><p>[HQ]<p style="margin-left: 20px">For Hasbro, in addition to losing hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue from Toys“R”Us, the liquidation of an additional hundreds of millions of dollars of their retail inventory sold into the market at large discounts was more impactful to 2018 than we, and industry experts, estimated. It is an unprecedented yet finite event. Prior to its initial bankruptcy filing, Toys“R”Us was our third largest customer in the U.S., and our second largest customer in Europe and Asia-Pacific. In Europe, its bankruptcy added to a market already dealing with disintermediation across retail by online and omni-channel retailers, as well as political and economic headwinds, notably in the UK. According to NPD, the European toy and game market declined 4% last year across the top six markets.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p>[/HQ]</p><p>All this added up to Hasbro revenues declining 12% to $4.6 billion, including a 13% decline in the fourth quarter. The implications for Hasbro go beyond the financial. Nerf, for example, had significant shelf space at Toys R Us, and it loses a major opportunity to showcase its brand with the loss of the toy store. </p><p></p><p>There was one bright spot in Hasbro's Q4, and it was <strong>Dungeons & Dragons</strong>. Goldner said the brand delivered "another record year" within the gaming portfolio, and that plans continue apace to expand D&D into digital play. Goldner pointed out in the Q&A that D&D being untethered from toy stores was actually an advantage, as they weren't significantly impacted by the loss of Toys R Us. </p><p></p><p>D&D has long since become an online brand -- at this point, there are so many resources online that it's entirely possible to play D&D for free -- that gives it an advantage in protecting the game's sales from the downturns in distribution channels. The loss of Toys R Us has put that advantage in sharp relief and Hasbro has taken notice. We'll likely see more focus on intellectual property brands like D&D in the future. </p><p></p><p><span style="color: #3E3E3E"><span style="color: #3E3E3E"><em>Mike "Talien" Tresca is a freelance game columnist, author, communicator, and a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to </em><em><a href="http://amazon.com/" target="_blank">http://amazon.com</a></em><em>. You can follow him at </em><a href="http://www.patreon.com/talien" target="_blank"><em>Patreon</em></a><em>.</em></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="talien, post: 7773292, member: 3285"] We've previously discussed a time when Dungeons & Dragons was considered [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?5416-When-D-D-Was-a-Toy"]as much of a toy as it was a book[/URL]. The loss of D&D in toy stores was a blow to a hobby that [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?3457-Who-Was-D-D-Meant-For"]found its footing[/URL] among a younger generation. Now things have come full circle as the bottom of the toy market fell out from under Wizards of the Coast's parent company, Hasbro.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK] [CENTER][ATTACH=CONFIG]104942[/ATTACH] Photo [URL="https://pixabay.com/en/lego-dragon-legoland-toys-built-3610646/"]courtesy of Pixabay[/URL].[/CENTER] [h=3]Toys vs. Books[/h]We [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?5416-When-D-D-Was-a-Toy"]discussed previously[/URL] how D&D wasn't just classified as a toy in some markets, but produced its own toy lines as well. D&D was carried in toy stores in the early 80s. The game's success in those markets was due in part to Dr. Eric J. Holmes' Basic version of D&D, which streamlined the rules and [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?3457-Who-Was-D-D-Meant-For"]made them more accessible to a younger audience[/URL]. But D&D was as much of a toy as it was a book, and bookstores carried the game too...[URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?481405-What-Will-Become-of-the-FLGS"]until they didn't[/URL]. Unlike the toy market, the book trade often carries a return policy. Random House stopped fronting then-D&D owner TSR's loans against book sales in 1996 and returned a third of TSR's products -- several million dollars' worth. That accumulated debt sunk the company, only to be rescued by Wizards of the Coast. Things came full circle when Wizards of the Coast (WOTC) was purchased by Hasbro. WOTC has continued to shepherd the D&D brand, which for years labored in the shadow of WOTC's other major game brand, the much more successful Magic: The Gathering card game. That all changed in the past few years. [h=3]Roleplaying vs. Card Games[/h]The tension between D&D and Magic goes back years, with [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?3006-Where-Has-the-Magic-Gone"]several failed attempts to cross-pollinate the two brands[/URL]. It's also emblematic of two different markets: Magic, with a smaller physical footprint, can be sold everywhere from book stores to the big box franchises like Target in the U.S.; [B]Dungeons & Dragons[/B] left both the book and toy store market behind to focus on sales through hobby store and the Internet. Thanks to WOTC's new CEO, [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?488519-D-amp-D-CEOs-The-Wizards-of-the-Coast-Years"]Chris Cocks[/URL], the two brands have finally managed to produce joint efforts like [B]The Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica[/B]. Beyond a D&D product, Magic's digital efforts with [B]Magic: The Gathering Arena [/B]have blazed a path for [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4681-Could-D-D-Ever-Have-an-eSport"]D&D esports[/URL], which Hasbro CEO Brian Goldner [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?525581-A-New-Digital-Direction-for-Wizards"]breathlessly reported[/URL] (and then retracted). It's clear that Cocks isn't playing favorites and sees both brands as fertile intellectual property beyond the original play spaces that spawned them. That's good news for Hasbro, because the market recently bottomed out of places that carry much of their product. [h=3]Toys Aren't Us[/h]Toys R Us' collapse has sent shock waves through the industry, but it was a tsunami for the two major toy producers, Hasbro and Mattel. Toys R Us accounted for 10% of Hasbro's sales. Brian Goldner [URL="https://seekingalpha.com/article/4239553-hasbro-inc-ceo-brian-goldner-q4-2018-results-earnings-call-transcript?part=single"]explained on the Q4 investor call[/URL]: [HQ][INDENT]For Hasbro, in addition to losing hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue from Toys“R”Us, the liquidation of an additional hundreds of millions of dollars of their retail inventory sold into the market at large discounts was more impactful to 2018 than we, and industry experts, estimated. It is an unprecedented yet finite event. Prior to its initial bankruptcy filing, Toys“R”Us was our third largest customer in the U.S., and our second largest customer in Europe and Asia-Pacific. In Europe, its bankruptcy added to a market already dealing with disintermediation across retail by online and omni-channel retailers, as well as political and economic headwinds, notably in the UK. According to NPD, the European toy and game market declined 4% last year across the top six markets. [/INDENT] [/HQ] All this added up to Hasbro revenues declining 12% to $4.6 billion, including a 13% decline in the fourth quarter. The implications for Hasbro go beyond the financial. Nerf, for example, had significant shelf space at Toys R Us, and it loses a major opportunity to showcase its brand with the loss of the toy store. There was one bright spot in Hasbro's Q4, and it was [B]Dungeons & Dragons[/B]. Goldner said the brand delivered "another record year" within the gaming portfolio, and that plans continue apace to expand D&D into digital play. Goldner pointed out in the Q&A that D&D being untethered from toy stores was actually an advantage, as they weren't significantly impacted by the loss of Toys R Us. D&D has long since become an online brand -- at this point, there are so many resources online that it's entirely possible to play D&D for free -- that gives it an advantage in protecting the game's sales from the downturns in distribution channels. The loss of Toys R Us has put that advantage in sharp relief and Hasbro has taken notice. We'll likely see more focus on intellectual property brands like D&D in the future. [COLOR=#3E3E3E][COLOR=#3E3E3E][I]Mike "Talien" Tresca is a freelance game columnist, author, communicator, and a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to [/I][I][URL="http://amazon.com/"]http://amazon.com[/URL][/I][I]. You can follow him at [/I][URL="http://www.patreon.com/talien"][I]Patreon[/I][/URL][I].[/I][/COLOR][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
It's a Good Thing D&D Isn't a Toy
Top