Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Living 4th Edition Discussion Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Graf" data-source="post: 4421390" data-attributes="member: 3087"><p>Actually was I just looking for 3 yeses or one objection. One objection and we work with the objector to fashion a solution that they appreciate.</p><p></p><p>Personally? I think that people don't vote sometimes because they are satisfied that things are going to turn out fine.</p><p>[sblock=In the US]50% of the people don't vote. I often skip elections. I've always argued that I skip elections because 1. I'm indifferent between the two candidates or 2. My vote won't matter (my home state's pretty solidly in one category). </p><p></p><p>Most of the friends I've talked to tend to argue that whatever my reasons for voting are the vast majority of people "really want to vote and have their opinions heard, but don't".</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure that I buy that. Maybe I think that people feel more enabled than they really are.[/sblock]</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I've made my push. </p><p>I'm happy to let other people wrestle with the facilitator thing. I'll keep an eye out and go with whatever's decided.</p><p></p><p>I -would- point out: we're elected facilitators, not judges. It's a temporary thing. </p><p>AND</p><p>We have very little momentum right now. Waiting for some new group to appear and bless or curse our initiative (now that we're in a forum that nobody goes to) isn't probably going to work out.</p><p></p><p>But a day or two won't matter.</p><p></p><p>[d]--[/d]</p><p></p><p>I think we need to start working seriously on the setting thing.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Personally I think it's going to be hellish trying to take adventure and character submissions with no world idea.</p><p>And it's unfair to people who are submitting, since whatever we approve will have to be changed later when the setting is adopted (especially if it's not a modular setting).</p><p></p><p>[d]--[/d]</p><p></p><p>I think <em>some</em>body needs to decide the following:</p><p>1. How much a setting needs before we vote on it</p><p>2. How we vote on a setting (the roadmap says we go setting by setting) - I was thinking meta->actual setting but nobody seems to like doing meta discussions so maybe we should just throw it open with a bunch of options?</p><p>3. What's required for a character submission (I think/hope renau1g is working on a new character sheet based on <a href="http://www.enworld.org/wiki/index.php/Template:L4W:Character" target="_blank">GK's original</a>). I really want a section where people "show their math". I.e. how they got each number.</p><p>I also want to see a roleplaying section like </p><p></p><p>4. What we need to support character creation</p><p>5. Are we going to have DM points, or something else to reward DMs for running games?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Graf, post: 4421390, member: 3087"] Actually was I just looking for 3 yeses or one objection. One objection and we work with the objector to fashion a solution that they appreciate. Personally? I think that people don't vote sometimes because they are satisfied that things are going to turn out fine. [sblock=In the US]50% of the people don't vote. I often skip elections. I've always argued that I skip elections because 1. I'm indifferent between the two candidates or 2. My vote won't matter (my home state's pretty solidly in one category). Most of the friends I've talked to tend to argue that whatever my reasons for voting are the vast majority of people "really want to vote and have their opinions heard, but don't". I'm not sure that I buy that. Maybe I think that people feel more enabled than they really are.[/sblock] Anyway, I've made my push. I'm happy to let other people wrestle with the facilitator thing. I'll keep an eye out and go with whatever's decided. I -would- point out: we're elected facilitators, not judges. It's a temporary thing. AND We have very little momentum right now. Waiting for some new group to appear and bless or curse our initiative (now that we're in a forum that nobody goes to) isn't probably going to work out. But a day or two won't matter. [d]--[/d] I think we need to start working seriously on the setting thing. Personally I think it's going to be hellish trying to take adventure and character submissions with no world idea. And it's unfair to people who are submitting, since whatever we approve will have to be changed later when the setting is adopted (especially if it's not a modular setting). [d]--[/d] I think [I]some[/I]body needs to decide the following: 1. How much a setting needs before we vote on it 2. How we vote on a setting (the roadmap says we go setting by setting) - I was thinking meta->actual setting but nobody seems to like doing meta discussions so maybe we should just throw it open with a bunch of options? 3. What's required for a character submission (I think/hope renau1g is working on a new character sheet based on [URL="http://www.enworld.org/wiki/index.php/Template:L4W:Character"]GK's original[/URL]). I really want a section where people "show their math". I.e. how they got each number. I also want to see a roleplaying section like 4. What we need to support character creation 5. Are we going to have DM points, or something else to reward DMs for running games? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Living 4th Edition Discussion Thread
Top