Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
New Open Design: Halls of the Mountain King
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 4612785" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p>Wow, you really seem to have taken my post pretty badly. I appreciate that you're restraining what seems to be some pretty serious enmity there, so let's see if we can't clear up a few things.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, gee, are those my only two choices? It's hard to decide between such attractive options.</p><p></p><p>Seriously, I posted that because I thought it was helpful and informative to people reading the thread. There's nothing else there but what you're reading into it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Generally a good policy to have.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I left that off because I didn't seem particularly relevant. The topic was where the patronage was at the moment - Wolfgang's speculation about where it may or may not go didn't seem very topical in that regard.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Really? It seems rather odd that someone "neutral" would call that missing sentence provocative. I thought it just didn't matter, personally.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Which is why I didn't do that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, it's not in regards to the sentence you put back in; it's in reference to the part I originally quoted. You added back in speculation, nothing more, nothing less.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I didn't say it was radically inaccurate. I just noted that what I'd seen didn't mesh up with what you said, and pointed that out. It wasn't a personal attack.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Huh?</p><p></p><p>Why would anyone expect that of you in the first place? It's not like you're speaking on behalf of the Open Design project or anything.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This seems a tad melodramatic. It's not like we're in the middle of a flamewar; nobody is calling anybody a liar. It's just a forum post.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Cool. I'm not saying anyone's right or wrong. I'm just trying to introduce data as I locate it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You felt childish citing your sources? How is that "one-upmanship"?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This doesn't sound like very "edition neutral" talk I'm hearing. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Just out of curiosity, was somebody arguing with that, right mind or not?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why then did you decide to make it so? Because that's how your post sounds.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Booyah.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 4612785, member: 8461"] Wow, you really seem to have taken my post pretty badly. I appreciate that you're restraining what seems to be some pretty serious enmity there, so let's see if we can't clear up a few things. Well, gee, are those my only two choices? It's hard to decide between such attractive options. Seriously, I posted that because I thought it was helpful and informative to people reading the thread. There's nothing else there but what you're reading into it. Generally a good policy to have. I left that off because I didn't seem particularly relevant. The topic was where the patronage was at the moment - Wolfgang's speculation about where it may or may not go didn't seem very topical in that regard. Really? It seems rather odd that someone "neutral" would call that missing sentence provocative. I thought it just didn't matter, personally. Which is why I didn't do that. Actually, it's not in regards to the sentence you put back in; it's in reference to the part I originally quoted. You added back in speculation, nothing more, nothing less. I didn't say it was radically inaccurate. I just noted that what I'd seen didn't mesh up with what you said, and pointed that out. It wasn't a personal attack. Huh? Why would anyone expect that of you in the first place? It's not like you're speaking on behalf of the Open Design project or anything. This seems a tad melodramatic. It's not like we're in the middle of a flamewar; nobody is calling anybody a liar. It's just a forum post. Cool. I'm not saying anyone's right or wrong. I'm just trying to introduce data as I locate it. You felt childish citing your sources? How is that "one-upmanship"? This doesn't sound like very "edition neutral" talk I'm hearing. ;) Just out of curiosity, was somebody arguing with that, right mind or not? Why then did you decide to make it so? Because that's how your post sounds. Booyah. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
New Open Design: Halls of the Mountain King
Top