Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Played some Classic Traveller today
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 8097638" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>Here are some quotes from the 1977 rules (Book 2, p 36; Book 3, pp 8, 19, 20):</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">When a ship enters a star system, there is a chance that any one of a variety of ships will be encountered. The ship encounter table is used to determine the specific type of vessel which is met. This result may, and should, be superceded by the referee in specific situations, especially if a newly entered system is in military or civil turmoil, or involves other circumstance.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">[T]he referee should always feel free to impose worlds which have been deliberately (rather than randomly) generated. Often such planets will be devised specifically to reward or torment players.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Some random encounters are mandated by the referee. . . . The referee is always free to impose encounters to further the cause of the adventure being played; in many cases, he actually has a responsibility to do so.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Once the patron and the adventurers have met, the responsibility falls on the referee to determine the nature of the task the patron desires . . .</p><p></p><p>To my mind, these passages invite the referee to play an active role in framing (<em>not </em>dictating the resolution of) situations.</p><p></p><p>And when the players generate their PCs, there will be implied backstory (like the example in Book 1, or my example upthread of the "diplomat" spy, or the noble and his ship that he won gambling). It doesn't take a lot to make this a bit more explicit at the table - in our first session, it emerged as the PCs were generated and then in maybe 10 or 15 minutes of discussion afterwards.</p><p></p><p>These two things together - PC backstories, plus referee influence over framing - are what permit the game to have more direction than just 'space waifs' who trade and kill.</p><p></p><p>My own approach, which has worked so far, is to mostly use random generation (because otherwise it wouldn't be Traveller!) but to interpret those elements in a way that "furthers the cause of the adventure being played". So the patrons that the PCs meet up with are connected to their backstories and the unfolding ingame events; the randomly encountered vessels also connect in various ways, or create possibilities for action that fit the current situation; randomly encountered NPCs provide opportunities for the players to drive their goals forward; etc.</p><p></p><p>This is the sort of thing I have in mind when, upthread, I referred to "a bit more use of contemporary techniques". In general I don't think of this as "hacking" the system, given the passages I've quoted and the example of PC generation. But it is pushing the system a bit more firmly in a particular direction.</p><p></p><p>Besides a few rules variants, especially in the skill list and PC gen process, the only actual "hack" I have made is in relation to star map generation: rather than rolling up a sub-sector in advance I started with a stock of pre-generated worlds but dropped them in as seemed appropriate, gradually building up the star map in that way. As part of this, instead of rolling a die for each hex, I have a chart for rolling the number of adjacent worlds (with columns for system density that lead to outcomes roughly the same as what you would get for a 3+, 4+ or 5+ roll required for a system to be present in a hex).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 8097638, member: 42582"] Here are some quotes from the 1977 rules (Book 2, p 36; Book 3, pp 8, 19, 20): [indent]When a ship enters a star system, there is a chance that any one of a variety of ships will be encountered. The ship encounter table is used to determine the specific type of vessel which is met. This result may, and should, be superceded by the referee in specific situations, especially if a newly entered system is in military or civil turmoil, or involves other circumstance. [T]he referee should always feel free to impose worlds which have been deliberately (rather than randomly) generated. Often such planets will be devised specifically to reward or torment players. Some random encounters are mandated by the referee. . . . The referee is always free to impose encounters to further the cause of the adventure being played; in many cases, he actually has a responsibility to do so. Once the patron and the adventurers have met, the responsibility falls on the referee to determine the nature of the task the patron desires . . .[/indent] To my mind, these passages invite the referee to play an active role in framing ([I]not [/I]dictating the resolution of) situations. And when the players generate their PCs, there will be implied backstory (like the example in Book 1, or my example upthread of the "diplomat" spy, or the noble and his ship that he won gambling). It doesn't take a lot to make this a bit more explicit at the table - in our first session, it emerged as the PCs were generated and then in maybe 10 or 15 minutes of discussion afterwards. These two things together - PC backstories, plus referee influence over framing - are what permit the game to have more direction than just 'space waifs' who trade and kill. My own approach, which has worked so far, is to mostly use random generation (because otherwise it wouldn't be Traveller!) but to interpret those elements in a way that "furthers the cause of the adventure being played". So the patrons that the PCs meet up with are connected to their backstories and the unfolding ingame events; the randomly encountered vessels also connect in various ways, or create possibilities for action that fit the current situation; randomly encountered NPCs provide opportunities for the players to drive their goals forward; etc. This is the sort of thing I have in mind when, upthread, I referred to "a bit more use of contemporary techniques". In general I don't think of this as "hacking" the system, given the passages I've quoted and the example of PC generation. But it is pushing the system a bit more firmly in a particular direction. Besides a few rules variants, especially in the skill list and PC gen process, the only actual "hack" I have made is in relation to star map generation: rather than rolling up a sub-sector in advance I started with a stock of pre-generated worlds but dropped them in as seemed appropriate, gradually building up the star map in that way. As part of this, instead of rolling a die for each hex, I have a chart for rolling the number of adjacent worlds (with columns for system density that lead to outcomes roughly the same as what you would get for a 3+, 4+ or 5+ roll required for a system to be present in a hex). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Played some Classic Traveller today
Top