Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Players Self-Assigning Rolls
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7294012" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>No, you don't, you see the strawman characterization you've built. It has almost nothing to do with my game or why I've chosen to disallow calls for rolls.</p><p></p><p>Again, since you seem to be slow on the uptake here -- nothing I do limits my players from taking the actions they wish to take. They have as much freedom as your players. The only difference is that I actually ask them to state what actions they're taking and what they're looking to accomplish with those actions and not just drop dice and name a line on their character sheet. The former allows me to work with the player to achieve their goals -- goals that might also broaden the fiction that I originally placed. I dislike having to guess what approach my players mean by a roll result declaration.</p><p></p><p>So, if the players want to do whatever they can imagine to investigate the altar, they can do that. Depending on their approach, I may call for a roll, if I feel the outcome is both uncertain and has a price for failure. Otherwise, it succeeds or fails based on what my players declare, not some hidden desire of mine or a fixed set of immutable gates that they must guess the right actions to pass.</p><p></p><p>As for scenes, again, I fail to even grasp the point of a scene being set that doesn't have some kind of challenge. Given I said the altar was 1) dangerous to touch and 2) had treasure hidden in it, what would you call that? I call it a challenge -- can you get the goodies without the ouches. If my players are uninterested and decide to wander off, great, no skin off my back, we move the the next scene (in this dungeon concept, the next room). They can come back or whatever. If one of my players comes up with a goal and approach that's way cooler than what I had imagined (and this certainly happens), then I'll adapt the scene to allow the cool. I do this quite often. Most of my scenes are written as vague as possible to allow for easy manipulation of the fiction to allow cool player declarations. Literally, the example i gave for the altar is just about the totality of what I might prep for that challenge -- that there's a danger, what it is, and and rewards. So, an altar that explodes in negative energy when touched that has a nice goodie hidden inside. The owners of the alter would have been determined in earlier play by player interest and the goodie would likewise have been determined by earlier play as something the players want to go get. If these things aren't tied to things my players care about, we'd be doing something different.</p><p></p><p>And, to be clear, right now I'm running a sandbox game, so there are lots of things already loosely set, but everything being played is because the players want to do that thing, not because I've pre-written some stuff. I have no plot for my game, right now, because we're only a few sessions in and the players haven't developed one yet. They'll do that by their choices and the consequences thereof. I have a few setting themes that are guiding play right now and will remain, but I don't have reasons solidly in place for why those themes exist -- we'll find out in play, if they players care, too.</p><p></p><p>So, no, you don't understand why I play the way I do. You have it very wrong. I play the way I do because I got tired of guessing all the time and the frustration of a failed roll preventing things that shouldn't have been behind rolls to begin with. Oh, and pointless rolling, like all of the rolling you've discussed about the altar. As far as the game I run, it's very open to player desires and declarations. I enable a broader range of things now than I used to when I expected players to call out what skills they were using instead of telling me what they want to accomplish and how they're plan to do that.</p><p></p><p>Again, you're welcome to play the way you want to. I'm excited and happy there's more than one way to play this shared hobby of mine, because that means I have more to learn about it. I have room to improve. But, I would ask that you stop trying to assume why I do things, especially when I haven't been at all shy about telling you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7294012, member: 16814"] No, you don't, you see the strawman characterization you've built. It has almost nothing to do with my game or why I've chosen to disallow calls for rolls. Again, since you seem to be slow on the uptake here -- nothing I do limits my players from taking the actions they wish to take. They have as much freedom as your players. The only difference is that I actually ask them to state what actions they're taking and what they're looking to accomplish with those actions and not just drop dice and name a line on their character sheet. The former allows me to work with the player to achieve their goals -- goals that might also broaden the fiction that I originally placed. I dislike having to guess what approach my players mean by a roll result declaration. So, if the players want to do whatever they can imagine to investigate the altar, they can do that. Depending on their approach, I may call for a roll, if I feel the outcome is both uncertain and has a price for failure. Otherwise, it succeeds or fails based on what my players declare, not some hidden desire of mine or a fixed set of immutable gates that they must guess the right actions to pass. As for scenes, again, I fail to even grasp the point of a scene being set that doesn't have some kind of challenge. Given I said the altar was 1) dangerous to touch and 2) had treasure hidden in it, what would you call that? I call it a challenge -- can you get the goodies without the ouches. If my players are uninterested and decide to wander off, great, no skin off my back, we move the the next scene (in this dungeon concept, the next room). They can come back or whatever. If one of my players comes up with a goal and approach that's way cooler than what I had imagined (and this certainly happens), then I'll adapt the scene to allow the cool. I do this quite often. Most of my scenes are written as vague as possible to allow for easy manipulation of the fiction to allow cool player declarations. Literally, the example i gave for the altar is just about the totality of what I might prep for that challenge -- that there's a danger, what it is, and and rewards. So, an altar that explodes in negative energy when touched that has a nice goodie hidden inside. The owners of the alter would have been determined in earlier play by player interest and the goodie would likewise have been determined by earlier play as something the players want to go get. If these things aren't tied to things my players care about, we'd be doing something different. And, to be clear, right now I'm running a sandbox game, so there are lots of things already loosely set, but everything being played is because the players want to do that thing, not because I've pre-written some stuff. I have no plot for my game, right now, because we're only a few sessions in and the players haven't developed one yet. They'll do that by their choices and the consequences thereof. I have a few setting themes that are guiding play right now and will remain, but I don't have reasons solidly in place for why those themes exist -- we'll find out in play, if they players care, too. So, no, you don't understand why I play the way I do. You have it very wrong. I play the way I do because I got tired of guessing all the time and the frustration of a failed roll preventing things that shouldn't have been behind rolls to begin with. Oh, and pointless rolling, like all of the rolling you've discussed about the altar. As far as the game I run, it's very open to player desires and declarations. I enable a broader range of things now than I used to when I expected players to call out what skills they were using instead of telling me what they want to accomplish and how they're plan to do that. Again, you're welcome to play the way you want to. I'm excited and happy there's more than one way to play this shared hobby of mine, because that means I have more to learn about it. I have room to improve. But, I would ask that you stop trying to assume why I do things, especially when I haven't been at all shy about telling you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Players Self-Assigning Rolls
Top