Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Playtest Feedback: Ship Combat (part 2)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LucasC" data-source="post: 6256835" data-attributes="member: 6762606"><p>Last night we gave the starship combat rules another pass. Here's the results. </p><p></p><p>PC Ships </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">(3) S-22 "Ambusher" Class IV Pirate Ship</li> </ul><p></p><p>NPC Ships</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">(3) Modified "Millennial" Class Medium Freighter</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">(1) Durog "Killer" (see below)</li> </ul><p></p><p>Very brief synopsis: <p style="margin-left: 20px">The PCs had to escort a noncombative ship past the enemy which included the 3 Millennial vessels and the Killer. The combat began with the PCs in a hidden base launching their ships into space while the enemy drifted around slowly above. The Killer never fired its weapons. The PCs focused all their guns on it and, thanks to some lucky rolls, destroyed it before it had a chance to shoot. The Millennial ships were eventually destroyed by the remaining PC vessels but not before they took out one of the Ambushers. <strong>These ships (Ambusher v Millennial) seemed a relatively good match</strong>. </p><p></p><p>In general, the combat was much improved thanks to the new movement and initiative rules. All of the weirdness experienced in our last run vanished and the battles ran smoothly.</p><p></p><p>On Initiative </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Everyone liked the way initiative worked.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">With the new rules, the initiative winner has a significant advantage given the losing party moves and then the winning party moves - on numerous occasions this allowed the winner to move out of the firing arc of an opposing ship.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Our teams bounced initiative back and forth, with the PCs going first sometimes and the NPCs going first sometimes. This added a nice variety to the combat and (IMO) should be what you shoot for with the rules.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">When we started we were skeptical about re-rolling initiative every round given the extra bookkeeping and such, that concern evaporated entirely after seeing it in action and seeing how it affected gameplay. It would be an overpowering advantage to have it rolled once and set for the battle.</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">We concluded immediately that re-rolling initiative every round was going to lead us to an awful lot of rolls given we had seven ships involved. As we were already tracking a lot of things (velocity, shield SOAK reduction, Superstructure damage, casualties, damage to PCs, etc.) we opted to forgo individual initiative and each side rolled initiative at the start of every turn - this worked out well and seemed to be a good compromise between the choices we had.</li> </ul><p></p><p>General Feedback</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The encounter took just over 1.5 hours to complete.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The system is complex. I had a new player at the table and he was somewhat overwhelmed. At least one other player felt like there was too much for him to keep track of. This should be less of an issue as we play more, but it definitely intimidates some people.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Using dice to track things such as velocity and damage was very helpful.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Using Newtonian mechanics, and assuming a destroyed ship maintains its velocity, the combination of the countdown before explosion and the forward momentum generally meant that these ships flew off into space to explode with no impact on gameplay.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In one instance, I rolled all 6s for the countdown and the ship exploded immediately, but that is not going to be the 'normal' result. There were a total of 5 ships destroyed.</li> </ul></li> </ul><p></p><p>Questions</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Should I check for an Ambush Turn in space when appropriate?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Does the +1d6 ship action bonus for high morale apply to weapon damage?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Using Newtonian mechanics, is there a minimum movement cost for turning if velocity is very low?</li> </ul><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]60515[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p></p><p>Here's a pic of our board somewhere towards the middle of the battle. I spent a few hours Saturday looking at miniature options and purchased a copy of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wizards-of-the-Coast-169212040/dp/B004XBKQKG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1391608361&sr=8-1&keywords=battleship+galaxies" target="_blank">Battleship Galaxies</a> which worked out well. It gave us some pretty cool little spaceships to use, a hex board and we used the little red battleship markers to track shield SOAK reduction. I'll probably buy a second copy for more ships and more hex board space. </p><p></p><p>The dice sitting next to the ships are tracking velocity. Later in the fight some had two dice next to them, one for velocity and one for superstructure damage. </p><p></p><p>The 3d6 you see in the top-left is a countdown pool for a ship that was destroyed that turn. As I mention above, except in one instance, this didn't have an effect on the game as the ships drifted out of the battle quickly. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]60517[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LucasC, post: 6256835, member: 6762606"] Last night we gave the starship combat rules another pass. Here's the results. PC Ships [LIST] [*](3) S-22 "Ambusher" Class IV Pirate Ship [/LIST] NPC Ships [LIST] [*](3) Modified "Millennial" Class Medium Freighter [*](1) Durog "Killer" (see below) [/LIST] Very brief synopsis: [INDENT]The PCs had to escort a noncombative ship past the enemy which included the 3 Millennial vessels and the Killer. The combat began with the PCs in a hidden base launching their ships into space while the enemy drifted around slowly above. The Killer never fired its weapons. The PCs focused all their guns on it and, thanks to some lucky rolls, destroyed it before it had a chance to shoot. The Millennial ships were eventually destroyed by the remaining PC vessels but not before they took out one of the Ambushers. [B]These ships (Ambusher v Millennial) seemed a relatively good match[/B]. [/INDENT] In general, the combat was much improved thanks to the new movement and initiative rules. All of the weirdness experienced in our last run vanished and the battles ran smoothly. On Initiative [LIST] [*]Everyone liked the way initiative worked. [*]With the new rules, the initiative winner has a significant advantage given the losing party moves and then the winning party moves - on numerous occasions this allowed the winner to move out of the firing arc of an opposing ship. [*]Our teams bounced initiative back and forth, with the PCs going first sometimes and the NPCs going first sometimes. This added a nice variety to the combat and (IMO) should be what you shoot for with the rules. [LIST] [*]When we started we were skeptical about re-rolling initiative every round given the extra bookkeeping and such, that concern evaporated entirely after seeing it in action and seeing how it affected gameplay. It would be an overpowering advantage to have it rolled once and set for the battle. [/LIST] [*]We concluded immediately that re-rolling initiative every round was going to lead us to an awful lot of rolls given we had seven ships involved. As we were already tracking a lot of things (velocity, shield SOAK reduction, Superstructure damage, casualties, damage to PCs, etc.) we opted to forgo individual initiative and each side rolled initiative at the start of every turn - this worked out well and seemed to be a good compromise between the choices we had. [/LIST] General Feedback [LIST] [*]The encounter took just over 1.5 hours to complete. [*]The system is complex. I had a new player at the table and he was somewhat overwhelmed. At least one other player felt like there was too much for him to keep track of. This should be less of an issue as we play more, but it definitely intimidates some people. [*]Using dice to track things such as velocity and damage was very helpful. [*]Using Newtonian mechanics, and assuming a destroyed ship maintains its velocity, the combination of the countdown before explosion and the forward momentum generally meant that these ships flew off into space to explode with no impact on gameplay. [LIST] [*]In one instance, I rolled all 6s for the countdown and the ship exploded immediately, but that is not going to be the 'normal' result. There were a total of 5 ships destroyed. [/LIST] [/LIST] Questions [LIST] [*]Should I check for an Ambush Turn in space when appropriate? [*]Does the +1d6 ship action bonus for high morale apply to weapon damage? [*]Using Newtonian mechanics, is there a minimum movement cost for turning if velocity is very low? [/LIST] [ATTACH=CONFIG]60515._xfImport[/ATTACH] Here's a pic of our board somewhere towards the middle of the battle. I spent a few hours Saturday looking at miniature options and purchased a copy of [URL="http://www.amazon.com/Wizards-of-the-Coast-169212040/dp/B004XBKQKG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1391608361&sr=8-1&keywords=battleship+galaxies"]Battleship Galaxies[/URL] which worked out well. It gave us some pretty cool little spaceships to use, a hex board and we used the little red battleship markers to track shield SOAK reduction. I'll probably buy a second copy for more ships and more hex board space. The dice sitting next to the ships are tracking velocity. Later in the fight some had two dice next to them, one for velocity and one for superstructure damage. The 3d6 you see in the top-left is a countdown pool for a ship that was destroyed that turn. As I mention above, except in one instance, this didn't have an effect on the game as the ships drifted out of the battle quickly. [ATTACH=CONFIG]60517._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Playtest Feedback: Ship Combat (part 2)
Top