Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Power and Pathfinder Classes - Forked Thread: Pathfinder - sell me
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Roman" data-source="post: 4785406" data-attributes="member: 1845"><p>Forked from: <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showpost.php?postid=4784243" target="_blank"> Pathfinder - sell me </a></p><p></p><p>The above-linked thread rekindled the discussion that we have had a few times already on the overall power level, as well as power differences between the classes in Pathfinder and 3.5E. </p><p></p><p>Increase in power-level as compared to 3.5E belongs among my main concerns about the Pathfinder RPG. The other top concerns of mine are the potential spread of magic to non-magical classes (I like to keep the magical and the non-magical as separate as possible) and the potential introduction of more gamist concepts such as per-encounter durations and such (which I intensely dislike). There is little evidence of the latter happening, which is good for me, but there is some evidence of the former with Rogues and Barbarians being the main potential culprits based on the beta, though we obviously don't know how the final version will treat them. There is, however, much more evidence for the power-level being jacked up in the Pathfinder RPG. </p><p></p><p>In some cases, increasing the power-level can actually be useful from the game design perspective. This is the case when it improves the balance among classes. Boosting the Fighter provides a good example of that. At other times, the improvement in flavor thanks to a certain ability is so large that the increase in power may be worthwhile - this may be the case with races having +2 to two ability scores instead of one (though in this case the option of a +2 to one of the two ability scores chosen by the player instead of to both would greatly limit the power boost and achieve much of the same effect). </p><p></p><p>Much of the time, however, I view the increases in power-level as problematic. One such case in the Pathfinder RPG is hit point inflation. More hit points boost power in a useful (as in powerful) but boring way (so no flavor to help overlook the increase). The hit point increases will also tend to make combats longer, when many of the complaints about high-level play in 3.5E are that combats last too long already. </p><p></p><p>Another problem is when power increases boost the classes that are already on top of the power-heap. An example is the Wizard (and the Cleric too with Channel Energy, when going against the Undead) in Pathfinder RPG. Already close to the top in terms of power in 3.5E (apart from Clerics and Druids), the Wizard in Pathfinder RPG gets three major boosts: </p><p></p><p>1) 40% increase in mean (average) hit points from hit dice (d4 upgraded to d6, so 2.5hp increases to 3.5hp on average) </p><p>2) A major ability (usually spell-like) every second level </p><p>3) An initial ability and a powerful capstone ability based on school (OK, so I admitedly do like the idea of capstones for all classes) </p><p></p><p>On the whole, I would say this is a bigger boost in power than even the Fighter gets in Pathfinder RPG! Of course, many of the spells are toned-down, so it is not an entirely fair comparison, but some of these changes are gratuitous (the hit dice increase for certain - it is not even targeted at low-level survivability, since the extra hit points accrue over levels). </p><p></p><p>I understand the notion that there needs to be an incentive to stay with the base class rather than automatically going for prestige classes, but if the spell-like abilities are necessary for this... shouldn't the Wizard lose something to compensate? How about something like maxing out Wizards spells at 3 per spell level rather than 4 per spell level (and doing the same for Clerics)? </p><p></p><p>Anyway, is there any evidence that in the final version of the Pathfinder RPG some of the power boosts to the powerful classes have been either removed or compensated for by removal or toning down of other features? How about the overall power level (things like hit point inflation and boosts to races) - is this being toned down as well in the final version? </p><p></p><p>Does anybody have any other thoughts on the matter?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Roman, post: 4785406, member: 1845"] Forked from: [url=http://www.enworld.org/forum/showpost.php?postid=4784243] Pathfinder - sell me [/url] The above-linked thread rekindled the discussion that we have had a few times already on the overall power level, as well as power differences between the classes in Pathfinder and 3.5E. Increase in power-level as compared to 3.5E belongs among my main concerns about the Pathfinder RPG. The other top concerns of mine are the potential spread of magic to non-magical classes (I like to keep the magical and the non-magical as separate as possible) and the potential introduction of more gamist concepts such as per-encounter durations and such (which I intensely dislike). There is little evidence of the latter happening, which is good for me, but there is some evidence of the former with Rogues and Barbarians being the main potential culprits based on the beta, though we obviously don't know how the final version will treat them. There is, however, much more evidence for the power-level being jacked up in the Pathfinder RPG. In some cases, increasing the power-level can actually be useful from the game design perspective. This is the case when it improves the balance among classes. Boosting the Fighter provides a good example of that. At other times, the improvement in flavor thanks to a certain ability is so large that the increase in power may be worthwhile - this may be the case with races having +2 to two ability scores instead of one (though in this case the option of a +2 to one of the two ability scores chosen by the player instead of to both would greatly limit the power boost and achieve much of the same effect). Much of the time, however, I view the increases in power-level as problematic. One such case in the Pathfinder RPG is hit point inflation. More hit points boost power in a useful (as in powerful) but boring way (so no flavor to help overlook the increase). The hit point increases will also tend to make combats longer, when many of the complaints about high-level play in 3.5E are that combats last too long already. Another problem is when power increases boost the classes that are already on top of the power-heap. An example is the Wizard (and the Cleric too with Channel Energy, when going against the Undead) in Pathfinder RPG. Already close to the top in terms of power in 3.5E (apart from Clerics and Druids), the Wizard in Pathfinder RPG gets three major boosts: 1) 40% increase in mean (average) hit points from hit dice (d4 upgraded to d6, so 2.5hp increases to 3.5hp on average) 2) A major ability (usually spell-like) every second level 3) An initial ability and a powerful capstone ability based on school (OK, so I admitedly do like the idea of capstones for all classes) On the whole, I would say this is a bigger boost in power than even the Fighter gets in Pathfinder RPG! Of course, many of the spells are toned-down, so it is not an entirely fair comparison, but some of these changes are gratuitous (the hit dice increase for certain - it is not even targeted at low-level survivability, since the extra hit points accrue over levels). I understand the notion that there needs to be an incentive to stay with the base class rather than automatically going for prestige classes, but if the spell-like abilities are necessary for this... shouldn't the Wizard lose something to compensate? How about something like maxing out Wizards spells at 3 per spell level rather than 4 per spell level (and doing the same for Clerics)? Anyway, is there any evidence that in the final version of the Pathfinder RPG some of the power boosts to the powerful classes have been either removed or compensated for by removal or toning down of other features? How about the overall power level (things like hit point inflation and boosts to races) - is this being toned down as well in the final version? Does anybody have any other thoughts on the matter? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Power and Pathfinder Classes - Forked Thread: Pathfinder - sell me
Top