Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Proposal 1 - dragon#364 made legal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="covaithe" data-source="post: 4591651" data-attributes="member: 46559"><p>Right. There seems to be a consensus to treat the separate articles as separate proposals. Having finally taken the time to read them all with at least reasonable care, I'll open the voting:</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Green">YES</span> to the warforged article.</p><p><span style="color: Green">YES</span> to the wizard illusion powers article.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Red">NO</span> to the Ashen Covenant article, mostly because it's only a few items, and I feel like we ought to consider Adventurer's Vault before we start going crazy with the additional item sources. I'd be willing to reconsider a proposal for a specific item that someone really wants, but unless we actually expect to use items from this source, I feel like the default answer should be no. </p><p></p><p><span style="color: Red">NO</span> to the Wolves of Maldeen article. There are three things in this article: a heroic tier feat, a warlord paragon path, and a bunch of items. I don't have any problem with the feat; if someone wants to take this feat, propose it separately and I'll vote yes. The paragon path I'm not sure about. It seems mostly okay, but some of the abilities seem far enough away from the standard mold of PP abilities that I'd have to think more about them. Since we've barely reached level 2 in L4W, let alone level 11, I think it's wise to hold off. The items, see above, and also the Wolfen Weapon seems like cheese to me.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Red">NO</span> to the Vor Kragal article. The only thing in there is one weapon, I'd want discussion of before allowing anyways, since it increases reach. I'd be willing to reconsider if someone really wanted the weapon and could provide arguments why it's okay.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="covaithe, post: 4591651, member: 46559"] Right. There seems to be a consensus to treat the separate articles as separate proposals. Having finally taken the time to read them all with at least reasonable care, I'll open the voting: [COLOR="Green"]YES[/COLOR] to the warforged article. [COLOR="Green"]YES[/COLOR] to the wizard illusion powers article. [COLOR="Red"]NO[/COLOR] to the Ashen Covenant article, mostly because it's only a few items, and I feel like we ought to consider Adventurer's Vault before we start going crazy with the additional item sources. I'd be willing to reconsider a proposal for a specific item that someone really wants, but unless we actually expect to use items from this source, I feel like the default answer should be no. [COLOR="Red"]NO[/COLOR] to the Wolves of Maldeen article. There are three things in this article: a heroic tier feat, a warlord paragon path, and a bunch of items. I don't have any problem with the feat; if someone wants to take this feat, propose it separately and I'll vote yes. The paragon path I'm not sure about. It seems mostly okay, but some of the abilities seem far enough away from the standard mold of PP abilities that I'd have to think more about them. Since we've barely reached level 2 in L4W, let alone level 11, I think it's wise to hold off. The items, see above, and also the Wolfen Weapon seems like cheese to me. [COLOR="Red"]NO[/COLOR] to the Vor Kragal article. The only thing in there is one weapon, I'd want discussion of before allowing anyways, since it increases reach. I'd be willing to reconsider if someone really wanted the weapon and could provide arguments why it's okay. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Proposal 1 - dragon#364 made legal
Top