Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living EN World
(Proposal) All things Ieranth - The Hex Lord
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sparky" data-source="post: 1573577" data-attributes="member: 13681"><p>First, thanks for the feedback. I don't always have proper perspective and it's instructive to hear comments from people whose ideas and judgement I've grown to respect.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The spell list is above. Though I think I should swap <em>Doom </em>for <em>Bane.</em> Thoughts?</p><p> </p><p><strong>The Doom Ability:</strong></p><p>As to the wording of the luck ability... originally this ability was MUCH different. I'm a touch nostalgic for it. </p><p> </p><p>In that ability once per day the Doom priest could enchant a simple mundane object (a coin, a feather, anything really) and by sleight of hand (or tongue) place it on someone. The person carrying this object (a <em>Luck Bane</em>) would have the effects of a <em>Bane</em> spell for their next save/check/attack. It would affect only one action. The effects of the <em>Luck Bane </em>would linger on the object for a day.</p><p> </p><p>I ditched it because I over-complicated the results with a table or somesuch nonsense. I think originally the <em>Luck Bane </em>cast the Bane spell, but I think it would be better if it just affected a single action. What do folks think about a return to this?</p><p> </p><p><strong>The Weapon:</strong></p><p>For the vengeful bastard on the street, the plotting that a net implies is perfect... the feats required for its use... not so good. I've envisioned Ieranth as iconically passive aggressive. So net fits that and my preference remains with the net, but I'd be fine with dropping it for something else (whips rule) or choosing a simple weapon if it's a barrier to his approval.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Alignment:</strong></p><p>My assessment of alignment is always a little off kilter. His lawful clerics I'd envisioned as ritually superstious bordering on obsessive compulsive. I liked that image... so if anything needs changed it's his alignment or his domains.</p><p> </p><p>What about changing his alignment to NE? That would solve it, and I'd drop the Chaos domain for... how about Evil?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sparky, post: 1573577, member: 13681"] First, thanks for the feedback. I don't always have proper perspective and it's instructive to hear comments from people whose ideas and judgement I've grown to respect. The spell list is above. Though I think I should swap [i]Doom [/i]for [i]Bane.[/i] Thoughts? [b]The Doom Ability:[/b] As to the wording of the luck ability... originally this ability was MUCH different. I'm a touch nostalgic for it. In that ability once per day the Doom priest could enchant a simple mundane object (a coin, a feather, anything really) and by sleight of hand (or tongue) place it on someone. The person carrying this object (a [i]Luck Bane[/i]) would have the effects of a [i]Bane[/i] spell for their next save/check/attack. It would affect only one action. The effects of the [i]Luck Bane [/i]would linger on the object for a day. I ditched it because I over-complicated the results with a table or somesuch nonsense. I think originally the [i]Luck Bane [/i]cast the Bane spell, but I think it would be better if it just affected a single action. What do folks think about a return to this? [b]The Weapon:[/b] For the vengeful bastard on the street, the plotting that a net implies is perfect... the feats required for its use... not so good. I've envisioned Ieranth as iconically passive aggressive. So net fits that and my preference remains with the net, but I'd be fine with dropping it for something else (whips rule) or choosing a simple weapon if it's a barrier to his approval. [b]Alignment:[/b] My assessment of alignment is always a little off kilter. His lawful clerics I'd envisioned as ritually superstious bordering on obsessive compulsive. I liked that image... so if anything needs changed it's his alignment or his domains. What about changing his alignment to NE? That would solve it, and I'd drop the Chaos domain for... how about Evil? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living EN World
(Proposal) All things Ieranth - The Hex Lord
Top