Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Proposal: Dragon 367
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="covaithe" data-source="post: 4764713" data-attributes="member: 46559"><p>ooc: Still working my way through. </p><p></p><p>The genasi feats seem fairly powerful. Too powerful? Borderline, but I'm currently thinking they're okay. </p><p></p><p>The intelligent items article I found a bit disappointing. There's nothing there mechanically, really. I can't see approving the specific items there for direct purchase by PCs. ("Excuse me, do you happen to have any frost weapons with the captured spirit of a wyrmling white dragon? Perhaps in a battleaxe?" "Not till next Tuesday...") As a set of guidelines for helping DMs create custom intelligent items, I suppose it's all right, but I don't see it requiring a vote.</p><p></p><p>The drow feats look fine. The weapons are mostly good. I wonder about the virulent weapon, but I think that's mostly because I wonder about poisons applied to weapons in general. Anyway, that's not going to make me vote no. The paragon path is okay, if boring. The epic destiny is okay, if thematically repulsive. </p><p></p><p>There's nothing to vote on in the bestiary article; DMs are free to use monsters from wherever they like, though we like it if they tell us where their monsters are from. </p><p></p><p>The gnoll race looks underpowered to me, but it's slightly less underpowered than the MM version, so I guess that's all right. The feats look fine. I'll think about the offhand business for claw fighter later. </p><p></p><p>I'm happy with the swordmage powers article. </p><p></p><p>I'm ready to go ahead and vote <span style="color: SeaGreen">YES</span> on everything except the intelligent weapons and bestiary articles, which I don't think contain any content that needs voting on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="covaithe, post: 4764713, member: 46559"] ooc: Still working my way through. The genasi feats seem fairly powerful. Too powerful? Borderline, but I'm currently thinking they're okay. The intelligent items article I found a bit disappointing. There's nothing there mechanically, really. I can't see approving the specific items there for direct purchase by PCs. ("Excuse me, do you happen to have any frost weapons with the captured spirit of a wyrmling white dragon? Perhaps in a battleaxe?" "Not till next Tuesday...") As a set of guidelines for helping DMs create custom intelligent items, I suppose it's all right, but I don't see it requiring a vote. The drow feats look fine. The weapons are mostly good. I wonder about the virulent weapon, but I think that's mostly because I wonder about poisons applied to weapons in general. Anyway, that's not going to make me vote no. The paragon path is okay, if boring. The epic destiny is okay, if thematically repulsive. There's nothing to vote on in the bestiary article; DMs are free to use monsters from wherever they like, though we like it if they tell us where their monsters are from. The gnoll race looks underpowered to me, but it's slightly less underpowered than the MM version, so I guess that's all right. The feats look fine. I'll think about the offhand business for claw fighter later. I'm happy with the swordmage powers article. I'm ready to go ahead and vote [COLOR="SeaGreen"]YES[/COLOR] on everything except the intelligent weapons and bestiary articles, which I don't think contain any content that needs voting on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Proposal: Dragon 367
Top