Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ravenloft Al modles Jasper questions and rants. Spoilers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve_MND" data-source="post: 6900992" data-attributes="member: 6801314"><p>That's exactly my point tho -- those <em>aren't </em>Organized Play campaigns you are referring to there -- those are two <em>home </em>campaigns. The idea of an Organized Play campaign (as it's been used for the last 15 years or so at least), was designed to allow people to do <em>exactly </em>that: take a character that they've played in a particular OP Campaign and take him to <em>any </em>other table that was running that same OP Campaign with <em>any </em>other players and be able to play him at there as well. Once you start mucking about with limits on that kind of portability (once you've played Module X, you can't play certain other ones anymore, etc.), I personally feel you are starting to erode one of the main reasons why OP was created in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Before OP Campaigns became a thing, you were pretty much limited to one of two types -- either home campaigns, which was just a bunch of friends sitting around playing whatever games they wanted, with whatever rules they wanted, or Convention games, which were typically one-shot modules that were run at a big conventions like GenCon, and usually had their own internal set of rules and pre-generated characters. OP Campaigns, when they came about, bridged those two -- they allowed a person to have a character they created themself, using a set of shared rules and guidelines that all DMs that were participating would follow, and participate in a series of modules developed for that campaign that may have been being run by dozens, hundreds, even thousands of DMs across the world. As a result, the freedom to be able to go from one table to the next (and being sure that your character was acceptable there as well) was pretty game-changing. That portability -- whether it be not having to play modules in a particular order, or the idea of not being locked out of certain things -- I feel is critical to how an OP Campaign should operate.</p><p></p><p>That said, I have started seeing the term being used across the industry with far, far less precision. I've heard people refer to the Kingmaker campaign settings and Call of Cthulhu's A Time To Harvest both as "Organized Play," where they're really not. Neither has an internal set of rules that the DM is not supposed to expand beyond, and there is no internal consistency to allow the free roaming of characters from one table to the other, for example.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm in the same boat. But I feel there's a big difference between planned obsolescence and accidental obsolescence.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Your group is probably also large and active enough that he figured he'd be likely to have the opportunity to play in any of the modules he wanted to. Smaller groups may not have that luxury. Our store group is small enough that we are very unlikely to ever play a second table of <em>any </em>of the Ravenloft games, so if someone misses one, it's unlikely they'll ever get the chance to play it again here, because once we cross that level 4 threshold, we don't have enough players with legal characters they feel like risking to garner to make that second table. Compare that to earlier seasons, where we would often run several mods multiple times, because there was no 'commitment' to the character. Once they played that mod, they weren't locked into anything, and could use them again if needed in whatever the next mod down the pike was.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>All my remarks on Baldman have been my own. It just turns out that they are shared by the majority of our 'core group' here (which I'm sure is not a coincidence, as we all went to genCon together and tended to play the same games together). I don't expect our experiences to be representative of everyone's there, just ours.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Your's is probably more representative, I'll admit, but I still feel it's important that both sides are presented, and to let the Admins sort it out. I've been an OP Admin once before, and while I loved it, I won't argue that it can be a pain in the arse.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That would be because it is.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And that's actually my concern.</p><p></p><p>AL is in fact a<em> single campaign</em>. A character you created in Season One is legal to be played in a Season Five adventure. A character you created in Season Three could play in a module from Season Two that somebody was running. Magic Items and character boons and XP gained and gold procured is legal and valid in <em>any </em>mod, from <em>any </em>season. Thus, that's a single campaign by any meaningful definition I can think of.</p><p></p><p>But what AL is doing is running a single campaign but, as you say, as segmented seasons. Different mechanics, different flavors, etc. They have created a single campaign that shifts like the winds each season, and personally, I don't like that approach. I don't like the mechanical aspect of having my character slaughtering lesser demons left and right in grand Lord of the Rings style one module, only to turn around and have to have him make a Madness check when he encounters a misshapen Dretch in the very next module.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I would have preferred to see each of these seasons operated as a separate, self-contained campaign. I also admit that my perceptions are colored in the heyday of Living Greyhawk, when the original campaign was planned out to be an epic 5-year story arc, covering dozens of modules per calendar year. That, for many of us, what was the Organized Play was designed for -- to allow for a long-term, awe-inspiring epic storytelling journey. You rotated characters in and out of that journey, depending on what module availability dictated, but regardless of who you were playing, the <em>overall story was a solid, continuous arc</em>.</p><p></p><p>LG was the engaging, long-term investment of these first six seasons of Game of Thrones. AL, on the other hand, feels more like the disjointed episodes of a sitcom in comparison. That said, I freely admit that I am apologetically making a very unfair judgement on AL -- they could not possibly be able to replicate what happened with LG. That was a perfect storm of enthusiastic corporate support, a massive player base, and a well-run, decentralized structure that allowed for massive variety across the board, yet still kept things within the same games-mechanics umbrella. The Admins can only go with what they have available to them.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying that a different way of handling these things would have been likely -- or even possible, given WotC's current approach to these things -- but that doesn't mean I can't think about what could have been, and whether or not it would be possible or even advisable to be steered in that direction in the future.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Trust me, I don't in any way assume my experiences here to be indicative of the entire player base. But I also don't think my store group is just a statistical anomaly either. But as long as our voices are heard, I'm fine with that. We'll both continue to make suggestions and argue for or against certain things, as everyone who plays this campaign should, but by the same token, if there comes point in time where the bother begins to outweigh the fun, it's time to move on to other things.</p><p></p><p>And with the new OGL up and running, and new things on the horizon, AL is no longer going to be the only option out there for Organized Play built around 5e. WotC would be wise to consider how they want to handle this new market. They dismantled the RPGA because they didn't like the idea of potentially 'promoting' competitor's games (as opposed to TSR's more inclusive, founding approach to the RPGA, which was 'a rising tide lifts all boats'). I'm curious to see if we're going to see a repeat of the massive industry growth we saw back in the heyday of 3rd edition. And if so, how WotC handles it this time around -- and what role AL does or doesn't play in it -- should prove to be interesting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve_MND, post: 6900992, member: 6801314"] That's exactly my point tho -- those [I]aren't [/I]Organized Play campaigns you are referring to there -- those are two [I]home [/I]campaigns. The idea of an Organized Play campaign (as it's been used for the last 15 years or so at least), was designed to allow people to do [I]exactly [/I]that: take a character that they've played in a particular OP Campaign and take him to [I]any [/I]other table that was running that same OP Campaign with [I]any [/I]other players and be able to play him at there as well. Once you start mucking about with limits on that kind of portability (once you've played Module X, you can't play certain other ones anymore, etc.), I personally feel you are starting to erode one of the main reasons why OP was created in the first place. Before OP Campaigns became a thing, you were pretty much limited to one of two types -- either home campaigns, which was just a bunch of friends sitting around playing whatever games they wanted, with whatever rules they wanted, or Convention games, which were typically one-shot modules that were run at a big conventions like GenCon, and usually had their own internal set of rules and pre-generated characters. OP Campaigns, when they came about, bridged those two -- they allowed a person to have a character they created themself, using a set of shared rules and guidelines that all DMs that were participating would follow, and participate in a series of modules developed for that campaign that may have been being run by dozens, hundreds, even thousands of DMs across the world. As a result, the freedom to be able to go from one table to the next (and being sure that your character was acceptable there as well) was pretty game-changing. That portability -- whether it be not having to play modules in a particular order, or the idea of not being locked out of certain things -- I feel is critical to how an OP Campaign should operate. That said, I have started seeing the term being used across the industry with far, far less precision. I've heard people refer to the Kingmaker campaign settings and Call of Cthulhu's A Time To Harvest both as "Organized Play," where they're really not. Neither has an internal set of rules that the DM is not supposed to expand beyond, and there is no internal consistency to allow the free roaming of characters from one table to the other, for example. I'm in the same boat. But I feel there's a big difference between planned obsolescence and accidental obsolescence. Your group is probably also large and active enough that he figured he'd be likely to have the opportunity to play in any of the modules he wanted to. Smaller groups may not have that luxury. Our store group is small enough that we are very unlikely to ever play a second table of [I]any [/I]of the Ravenloft games, so if someone misses one, it's unlikely they'll ever get the chance to play it again here, because once we cross that level 4 threshold, we don't have enough players with legal characters they feel like risking to garner to make that second table. Compare that to earlier seasons, where we would often run several mods multiple times, because there was no 'commitment' to the character. Once they played that mod, they weren't locked into anything, and could use them again if needed in whatever the next mod down the pike was. All my remarks on Baldman have been my own. It just turns out that they are shared by the majority of our 'core group' here (which I'm sure is not a coincidence, as we all went to genCon together and tended to play the same games together). I don't expect our experiences to be representative of everyone's there, just ours. Your's is probably more representative, I'll admit, but I still feel it's important that both sides are presented, and to let the Admins sort it out. I've been an OP Admin once before, and while I loved it, I won't argue that it can be a pain in the arse. That would be because it is. And that's actually my concern. AL is in fact a[I] single campaign[/I]. A character you created in Season One is legal to be played in a Season Five adventure. A character you created in Season Three could play in a module from Season Two that somebody was running. Magic Items and character boons and XP gained and gold procured is legal and valid in [I]any [/I]mod, from [I]any [/I]season. Thus, that's a single campaign by any meaningful definition I can think of. But what AL is doing is running a single campaign but, as you say, as segmented seasons. Different mechanics, different flavors, etc. They have created a single campaign that shifts like the winds each season, and personally, I don't like that approach. I don't like the mechanical aspect of having my character slaughtering lesser demons left and right in grand Lord of the Rings style one module, only to turn around and have to have him make a Madness check when he encounters a misshapen Dretch in the very next module. Personally, I would have preferred to see each of these seasons operated as a separate, self-contained campaign. I also admit that my perceptions are colored in the heyday of Living Greyhawk, when the original campaign was planned out to be an epic 5-year story arc, covering dozens of modules per calendar year. That, for many of us, what was the Organized Play was designed for -- to allow for a long-term, awe-inspiring epic storytelling journey. You rotated characters in and out of that journey, depending on what module availability dictated, but regardless of who you were playing, the [I]overall story was a solid, continuous arc[/I]. LG was the engaging, long-term investment of these first six seasons of Game of Thrones. AL, on the other hand, feels more like the disjointed episodes of a sitcom in comparison. That said, I freely admit that I am apologetically making a very unfair judgement on AL -- they could not possibly be able to replicate what happened with LG. That was a perfect storm of enthusiastic corporate support, a massive player base, and a well-run, decentralized structure that allowed for massive variety across the board, yet still kept things within the same games-mechanics umbrella. The Admins can only go with what they have available to them. I'm not saying that a different way of handling these things would have been likely -- or even possible, given WotC's current approach to these things -- but that doesn't mean I can't think about what could have been, and whether or not it would be possible or even advisable to be steered in that direction in the future. Trust me, I don't in any way assume my experiences here to be indicative of the entire player base. But I also don't think my store group is just a statistical anomaly either. But as long as our voices are heard, I'm fine with that. We'll both continue to make suggestions and argue for or against certain things, as everyone who plays this campaign should, but by the same token, if there comes point in time where the bother begins to outweigh the fun, it's time to move on to other things. And with the new OGL up and running, and new things on the horizon, AL is no longer going to be the only option out there for Organized Play built around 5e. WotC would be wise to consider how they want to handle this new market. They dismantled the RPGA because they didn't like the idea of potentially 'promoting' competitor's games (as opposed to TSR's more inclusive, founding approach to the RPGA, which was 'a rising tide lifts all boats'). I'm curious to see if we're going to see a repeat of the massive industry growth we saw back in the heyday of 3rd edition. And if so, how WotC handles it this time around -- and what role AL does or doesn't play in it -- should prove to be interesting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ravenloft Al modles Jasper questions and rants. Spoilers
Top