Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should a GM be allowed to arbitrarily make things up as they go along?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dungeoneer" data-source="post: 6234714" data-attributes="member: 91777"><p>So, I have this friend, let's call him 'Billy'. Billy has been coming to a semi-regular board game night that I and some other people put together. We play a lot of geeky, rules-heavy stuff like Zombicide and Munchkin. Billy really likes these games. </p><p></p><p>In addition, Billy is also a big fan of fantasy novels, collecting every thing to do with a certain popular, multi-volume series of massive fantasy tomes. And Billy likes CRPGs and MMOs that are fantasy flavored, including those based on D&D rulesets. </p><p></p><p>A couple months ago the boardgame group decided they wanted to play D&D. Of course I invited Billy. I felt that logically his love of rules intensive games and fantasy worlds would make him a natural fit. </p><p></p><p>ME "Hey man, you ever played D&D?" </p><p></p><p>BILLY: "No." </p><p></p><p>ME: "Well we're going to play a short game soon. I think it would be right up your alley. You in?"</p><p></p><p>BILLY "No, I don't like the idea that the GM that can arbitrarily change the rules of the game."</p><p></p><p>ME: *shocked silence*</p><p></p><p>This objection had never, ever occurred to me. I think of the GM (in my group of friends, often myself) as a benevolent presence trying to provide a fun and challenging game for the players. I had never considered that someone might view a GM as someone who was (potentially) changing the rules on a whim, interfering with the players, and generally playing god with the sacred rules of the game.</p><p></p><p>Having realized that there was at least one person in the world who felt this way about 'GM fiat', I started noticing a similar perspective on various messageboards. Here are some of the complaints I've observed that seem to share the same concern about arbitrary GMing:</p><p></p><p>- "This monster/NPC doesn't have any non-combat abilities listed. How am I supposed to use him out of combat?!?" </p><p>Me: I assume the NPC has whatever abilities needed to play its part in the story. </p><p>Anti-Arbitrary GMing person: It's not fair to just make up abilities for NPCs because that could lead to cheating or overpowered NPCs.</p><p></p><p>- "The core rulebook has no rules for underwater adventures. What am I supposed to do when my players encounter the dread Fishlocks next session??" </p><p>Me: Extrapolate some simple rules based on the existing rule set, tell the players the rules, and away we go. </p><p>Anti-Arbitrary: This would be a clear case of making up rules.</p><p></p><p>- "My min/maxing player has found a weird loophole in the rules that allows him to do quadruple damage. How can I stop him from ruining my game?" </p><p>Me: That 'loophole' is stupid. Don't let him use it.</p><p>Anti-Arbitrary: It's technically in the rules and I don't want to arbitrarily change the rules, so...</p><p></p><p>- "The party's dwarven cleric wants to buy a ruined temple. How much should it cost?"</p><p>Me: I'll spitball a cost that is just high enough to make things interesting for the dwarf cleric.</p><p>Anti-Arbitrary: There is a specific correct cost for everything in the world. If the cleric can afford to buy ten ruined temples, you have to let him. If ruined temples turn out to cost a billion gold, too bad for him."</p><p></p><p>I've always been taught that a good DM is creative, flexible, willing to make things up on the fly and re-calibrate the game for the maximum fun of the players. But it seems there are players for whom 're-calibrating' for fun will actually make things un-fun. Or am I reading too much into this? Is my friend just a lone lunatic clinging tightly to the illusion of control?</p><p></p><p>And if there ARE a lot of people who find the idea of the arbitrary GM distasteful, may I ask why?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dungeoneer, post: 6234714, member: 91777"] So, I have this friend, let's call him 'Billy'. Billy has been coming to a semi-regular board game night that I and some other people put together. We play a lot of geeky, rules-heavy stuff like Zombicide and Munchkin. Billy really likes these games. In addition, Billy is also a big fan of fantasy novels, collecting every thing to do with a certain popular, multi-volume series of massive fantasy tomes. And Billy likes CRPGs and MMOs that are fantasy flavored, including those based on D&D rulesets. A couple months ago the boardgame group decided they wanted to play D&D. Of course I invited Billy. I felt that logically his love of rules intensive games and fantasy worlds would make him a natural fit. ME "Hey man, you ever played D&D?" BILLY: "No." ME: "Well we're going to play a short game soon. I think it would be right up your alley. You in?" BILLY "No, I don't like the idea that the GM that can arbitrarily change the rules of the game." ME: *shocked silence* This objection had never, ever occurred to me. I think of the GM (in my group of friends, often myself) as a benevolent presence trying to provide a fun and challenging game for the players. I had never considered that someone might view a GM as someone who was (potentially) changing the rules on a whim, interfering with the players, and generally playing god with the sacred rules of the game. Having realized that there was at least one person in the world who felt this way about 'GM fiat', I started noticing a similar perspective on various messageboards. Here are some of the complaints I've observed that seem to share the same concern about arbitrary GMing: - "This monster/NPC doesn't have any non-combat abilities listed. How am I supposed to use him out of combat?!?" Me: I assume the NPC has whatever abilities needed to play its part in the story. Anti-Arbitrary GMing person: It's not fair to just make up abilities for NPCs because that could lead to cheating or overpowered NPCs. - "The core rulebook has no rules for underwater adventures. What am I supposed to do when my players encounter the dread Fishlocks next session??" Me: Extrapolate some simple rules based on the existing rule set, tell the players the rules, and away we go. Anti-Arbitrary: This would be a clear case of making up rules. - "My min/maxing player has found a weird loophole in the rules that allows him to do quadruple damage. How can I stop him from ruining my game?" Me: That 'loophole' is stupid. Don't let him use it. Anti-Arbitrary: It's technically in the rules and I don't want to arbitrarily change the rules, so... - "The party's dwarven cleric wants to buy a ruined temple. How much should it cost?" Me: I'll spitball a cost that is just high enough to make things interesting for the dwarf cleric. Anti-Arbitrary: There is a specific correct cost for everything in the world. If the cleric can afford to buy ten ruined temples, you have to let him. If ruined temples turn out to cost a billion gold, too bad for him." I've always been taught that a good DM is creative, flexible, willing to make things up on the fly and re-calibrate the game for the maximum fun of the players. But it seems there are players for whom 're-calibrating' for fun will actually make things un-fun. Or am I reading too much into this? Is my friend just a lone lunatic clinging tightly to the illusion of control? And if there ARE a lot of people who find the idea of the arbitrary GM distasteful, may I ask why? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should a GM be allowed to arbitrarily make things up as they go along?
Top