Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Siege Of Bordrin's Watch OOC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 4791139" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>I'm glad you're having fun thus far guys. And we've had some really good stuff thus far and it's making my decisions on what to do kinda difficult.</p><p></p><p>We have so many great characters there are a lot of options in play. One largish party, even though I know some people don't like games that include more than like five players (although in my experience usually at least two selected kind ot disappear within the first month anyway, thus bringing the group back down to five or six). Only problem with this option is that a number of people wouldn't be selected.</p><p></p><p>Two seperate parties are an option, but then it's a matter of deciding whether to run the same module with two different groups doing the same material, two seperate groups each doing half the module each, or one group doing the module as written, and me finding another module that could work as a companion piece and just change the fluff to have it be another aspect of the siege and have the second group run that. My only fear with this is that I'll get burned out trying to run two seperate modules at the same time.</p><p></p><p>Third option is to run the module with the group I select, and then start a seperate "Overlook & Bordrin's Watch" thread for everybody else not selected (plus anyone else who wanted to join in) to have an "open rping" thread to work their characters and plot as they see fit. I just don't know if a "non-directed" roleplay game would maintain interest and I'm afraid people would just stop posting.</p><p></p><p>Final option is for me to run the module as written, and someone else involved thus far run a second module in conjunction as a second part of the siege. Preferably someone who was playing in my game, so that they wouldn't feel as though they had to give up a spot to run a second game. But this involves someone stepping up to the plate and saying that they want to run a game in this same world, using some of the characters we've seen thus far, and is willing to find or write up a module that can be used as a second half of the siege. I'd partner up with said person and we would work everything out together, splitting up characters and such... but it'd need a committed person who likes what's been established thus far enough to want to run their own game.</p><p></p><p>A couple different options/problems here... and we'll just have to see what the next couple weeks brings before I make a decision on my aspect of the module.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 4791139, member: 7006"] I'm glad you're having fun thus far guys. And we've had some really good stuff thus far and it's making my decisions on what to do kinda difficult. We have so many great characters there are a lot of options in play. One largish party, even though I know some people don't like games that include more than like five players (although in my experience usually at least two selected kind ot disappear within the first month anyway, thus bringing the group back down to five or six). Only problem with this option is that a number of people wouldn't be selected. Two seperate parties are an option, but then it's a matter of deciding whether to run the same module with two different groups doing the same material, two seperate groups each doing half the module each, or one group doing the module as written, and me finding another module that could work as a companion piece and just change the fluff to have it be another aspect of the siege and have the second group run that. My only fear with this is that I'll get burned out trying to run two seperate modules at the same time. Third option is to run the module with the group I select, and then start a seperate "Overlook & Bordrin's Watch" thread for everybody else not selected (plus anyone else who wanted to join in) to have an "open rping" thread to work their characters and plot as they see fit. I just don't know if a "non-directed" roleplay game would maintain interest and I'm afraid people would just stop posting. Final option is for me to run the module as written, and someone else involved thus far run a second module in conjunction as a second part of the siege. Preferably someone who was playing in my game, so that they wouldn't feel as though they had to give up a spot to run a second game. But this involves someone stepping up to the plate and saying that they want to run a game in this same world, using some of the characters we've seen thus far, and is willing to find or write up a module that can be used as a second half of the siege. I'd partner up with said person and we would work everything out together, splitting up characters and such... but it'd need a committed person who likes what's been established thus far enough to want to run their own game. A couple different options/problems here... and we'll just have to see what the next couple weeks brings before I make a decision on my aspect of the module. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Siege Of Bordrin's Watch OOC
Top