Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Skills used by players on other players.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 7534224" data-attributes="member: 20564"><p>*blink*</p><p></p><p><em>Really?</em></p><p></p><p>I don't know of a respectful way to say this, but I hope you're trolling me because otherwise I don't understand where your multiple responses to my comments have been coming from since that was the point under discussion since the first.</p><p></p><p>Okay, going back to my original comment at the top of the tree you've been responding to:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I made a few mistakes here. I used bluff and insight instead of Charisma (Deception) and Wisdom (Insight). And my informal usage of "thinks" seems to have been a point of contention because it implies the DM can control the character and it should have been phrased differently that the character is attempting to gather information.</p><p></p><p>Would it help if I restated it like this:</p><p></p><p>"A being in the game world intentionally tells the group a lie.</p><p></p><p>Player B, regardless of their metagame knowledge of if it is a lie or not, seeks confirmation of what their character B can glean using their ability to read people. They wish to act on only knowledge their character would have.</p><p></p><p>If the being speaking was an NPC, 5e offers a system to resolve this with a Charisma (bluff) vs. either a passive Wisdom (Insight) or an active Wisdom (Insight) roll, depending on the variations of the table."</p><p></p><p>Is that clear what I am speaking about in regards of skill usage? Since common but informal usage of words seems to have been a bone of contention, should I say ability score checks that may be modified by skills?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue, post: 7534224, member: 20564"] *blink* [I]Really?[/I] I don't know of a respectful way to say this, but I hope you're trolling me because otherwise I don't understand where your multiple responses to my comments have been coming from since that was the point under discussion since the first. Okay, going back to my original comment at the top of the tree you've been responding to: I made a few mistakes here. I used bluff and insight instead of Charisma (Deception) and Wisdom (Insight). And my informal usage of "thinks" seems to have been a point of contention because it implies the DM can control the character and it should have been phrased differently that the character is attempting to gather information. Would it help if I restated it like this: "A being in the game world intentionally tells the group a lie. Player B, regardless of their metagame knowledge of if it is a lie or not, seeks confirmation of what their character B can glean using their ability to read people. They wish to act on only knowledge their character would have. If the being speaking was an NPC, 5e offers a system to resolve this with a Charisma (bluff) vs. either a passive Wisdom (Insight) or an active Wisdom (Insight) roll, depending on the variations of the table." Is that clear what I am speaking about in regards of skill usage? Since common but informal usage of words seems to have been a bone of contention, should I say ability score checks that may be modified by skills? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Skills used by players on other players.
Top