Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
(Suspended) OOC 3.5 Eberron Shipwrecked Campaign
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="airwalkrr" data-source="post: 6102822" data-attributes="member: 12460"><p>Okay, I have added "Recruiting!" to the thread title. We'll see if that grabs anyone's attention.</p><p></p><p>There is a certain level of edition snobbery with regards to both PF and 4e these days. I have noticed many folks feel one edition or the other is vastly superior and going back to 3e is somehow going to ruin the game. I don't happen to think either is a horrible game. But 3.5 is a good, solid game and it is what I am comfortable running. I have played both PF and 4e and don't particularly mind playing either. But when it comes to running a game I prefer 3.5. I am aware of all the ways the game can be broken (as every game can) and I know how to handle them effectively. I feel like running PF would put me too much on the defensive as I haven't made a concerted effort to keep up with it. Plus I would have to convert all my ready-made Eberron stuff to PF. As much as Paizo claims the rules are compatible, they changed just enough to make conversion a headache. It isn't like I can take a stat block, change up one or two things, and be good to go. On top of that, not all 3.5 mechanics play nicely with PF mechanics. There would be several pages of errata I would have to do to make Just the Eberron Campaign Setting compatible. I don't care to do that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="airwalkrr, post: 6102822, member: 12460"] Okay, I have added "Recruiting!" to the thread title. We'll see if that grabs anyone's attention. There is a certain level of edition snobbery with regards to both PF and 4e these days. I have noticed many folks feel one edition or the other is vastly superior and going back to 3e is somehow going to ruin the game. I don't happen to think either is a horrible game. But 3.5 is a good, solid game and it is what I am comfortable running. I have played both PF and 4e and don't particularly mind playing either. But when it comes to running a game I prefer 3.5. I am aware of all the ways the game can be broken (as every game can) and I know how to handle them effectively. I feel like running PF would put me too much on the defensive as I haven't made a concerted effort to keep up with it. Plus I would have to convert all my ready-made Eberron stuff to PF. As much as Paizo claims the rules are compatible, they changed just enough to make conversion a headache. It isn't like I can take a stat block, change up one or two things, and be good to go. On top of that, not all 3.5 mechanics play nicely with PF mechanics. There would be several pages of errata I would have to do to make Just the Eberron Campaign Setting compatible. I don't care to do that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
(Suspended) OOC 3.5 Eberron Shipwrecked Campaign
Top