Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The final word on DPR, feats and class balance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7444070" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>That's someone else's numbers, I'm leary (I expect they're actually closer to parity on a reasonable analysis) but I'll accept them for the sake of argument. Yep. The fighter is a very DPR-focused design, it's best features work best when devoted to delivering DPR, it'll put in it's best showing in such comparisons. When that's not good enough, it's a very bad sign for the fighter.</p><p></p><p> 'Show up' by such a large margin the fighter's not even really in the running, sure. If you want to compare classes over many dimensions of contribution rather than focusing on DPR-as-King, the fighter will loose a lot of such comparisons by very large margins, indeed (as will the Sorcerer to the Wizard or Bard, likely) - you're prettymuch back to shaking down the Class Tiers, with that kind of analysis.</p><p></p><p> There's a conclusion? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p> </p><p>Zapp's conclusion is that the fighter 'needs' GWM/SS. </p><p></p><p>If DPR really were 'king' that'd be less likely the case, as mere parity in DPR would be all anyone needed - since versatility would be valued at nil, the only thing having other things to channel your resources to than DPR would be 'traps.' The fighter would be downright dominant, and cutting GWM/SS would be a safe call.</p><p></p><p>Nod. It's a straightforward balancing act. The fighter has little to do outside of tanking away in combat and grinding out the DPR. As long as he's better than that by some margin, it makes up for all the times he's 'twiddling his thumbs.' The margin depends on the emphasis on combat over social/exploration, and, in combat, on DPR over other factors. The more important DPR, the narrower the margin the fighter needs to balance - but, unless DPR really is King, he needs /some/ margin of advantage in that area. The more 'holistic' and varied the campaign, the larger the advantage the fighter needs in combat to really shine bright enough when he has the opportunity to do so. If you have weeks of painstaking exploration and cunning politicking, then, finally a battle one day, and grinding out DPR is the only thing that matters, that day, then more versatile classes can go all-in on that - the fighter /still/ has to beat them in that case, and not by a small margin, to seize his rare chance to shine. </p><p></p><p>It's a delicate balancing act, really, and, while for the sake of argument, I'm willing to accept the theory and discuss it's implications (like "Fighters 'need' GWM/SS to get enough DPR to balance"), my personal opinion is that it never really works. The DPR character is either irrelevant and overshadowed, or downright OP and game-wrecking. There's a shifting DPR threshold and he's either on one side of it or another, it never actually balances. It's just too specific, yet too critical, a contribution to use as a prime, let alone sole, balancing factor for a character, let alone a whole set of sub-classes.</p><p></p><p> 'Meh' on all counts. The hp advantage is 1/level. AC can be cheesed up in a variety of ways. IDK what BA has to do with healing, but Second Wind trails off in importance rapidly. And 'better' saving throws? The fighter is STR/CON, the sorcerer CON/CHA. In both cases, CON is the more important save, and CON a second-priority stat, while the less-important save maps to the primary stat (setting aside the otherwise very effective DEX-fighter builds, like the Archery SS). STR saves come up more often, but they're usually for comparatively minor effects, while CHA saves keep you from, for the major instance, being dominated (which, with a DPR build, is nice for your party).</p><p></p><p> Yes, even the Sorcerer has considerable versatility. He /can/ put a lot towards DPR, or he can put it towards defense or whatever else he knows a spell for... he can't compete with the Wizard, but he's got it all over the fighter, that way.</p><p> No problem, compare that sorcerer to a SS fighter who can't be attack and is fully buffed and expending all his limited resources on DPR. Fair's fair. </p><p></p><p> "Waste of time" I suspect. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> But, sure, maybe a Champion/Berserker or something? I mean, you are delaying or even losing extra attack by MCing out of fighter, and in a weapon-based DPR build that's not such a great idea, but MCing should certainly be open to both.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7444070, member: 996"] That's someone else's numbers, I'm leary (I expect they're actually closer to parity on a reasonable analysis) but I'll accept them for the sake of argument. Yep. The fighter is a very DPR-focused design, it's best features work best when devoted to delivering DPR, it'll put in it's best showing in such comparisons. When that's not good enough, it's a very bad sign for the fighter. 'Show up' by such a large margin the fighter's not even really in the running, sure. If you want to compare classes over many dimensions of contribution rather than focusing on DPR-as-King, the fighter will loose a lot of such comparisons by very large margins, indeed (as will the Sorcerer to the Wizard or Bard, likely) - you're prettymuch back to shaking down the Class Tiers, with that kind of analysis. There's a conclusion? ;) Zapp's conclusion is that the fighter 'needs' GWM/SS. If DPR really were 'king' that'd be less likely the case, as mere parity in DPR would be all anyone needed - since versatility would be valued at nil, the only thing having other things to channel your resources to than DPR would be 'traps.' The fighter would be downright dominant, and cutting GWM/SS would be a safe call. Nod. It's a straightforward balancing act. The fighter has little to do outside of tanking away in combat and grinding out the DPR. As long as he's better than that by some margin, it makes up for all the times he's 'twiddling his thumbs.' The margin depends on the emphasis on combat over social/exploration, and, in combat, on DPR over other factors. The more important DPR, the narrower the margin the fighter needs to balance - but, unless DPR really is King, he needs /some/ margin of advantage in that area. The more 'holistic' and varied the campaign, the larger the advantage the fighter needs in combat to really shine bright enough when he has the opportunity to do so. If you have weeks of painstaking exploration and cunning politicking, then, finally a battle one day, and grinding out DPR is the only thing that matters, that day, then more versatile classes can go all-in on that - the fighter /still/ has to beat them in that case, and not by a small margin, to seize his rare chance to shine. It's a delicate balancing act, really, and, while for the sake of argument, I'm willing to accept the theory and discuss it's implications (like "Fighters 'need' GWM/SS to get enough DPR to balance"), my personal opinion is that it never really works. The DPR character is either irrelevant and overshadowed, or downright OP and game-wrecking. There's a shifting DPR threshold and he's either on one side of it or another, it never actually balances. It's just too specific, yet too critical, a contribution to use as a prime, let alone sole, balancing factor for a character, let alone a whole set of sub-classes. 'Meh' on all counts. The hp advantage is 1/level. AC can be cheesed up in a variety of ways. IDK what BA has to do with healing, but Second Wind trails off in importance rapidly. And 'better' saving throws? The fighter is STR/CON, the sorcerer CON/CHA. In both cases, CON is the more important save, and CON a second-priority stat, while the less-important save maps to the primary stat (setting aside the otherwise very effective DEX-fighter builds, like the Archery SS). STR saves come up more often, but they're usually for comparatively minor effects, while CHA saves keep you from, for the major instance, being dominated (which, with a DPR build, is nice for your party). Yes, even the Sorcerer has considerable versatility. He /can/ put a lot towards DPR, or he can put it towards defense or whatever else he knows a spell for... he can't compete with the Wizard, but he's got it all over the fighter, that way. No problem, compare that sorcerer to a SS fighter who can't be attack and is fully buffed and expending all his limited resources on DPR. Fair's fair. "Waste of time" I suspect. ;) But, sure, maybe a Champion/Berserker or something? I mean, you are delaying or even losing extra attack by MCing out of fighter, and in a weapon-based DPR build that's not such a great idea, but MCing should certainly be open to both. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The final word on DPR, feats and class balance
Top