Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Great Nerf to High Level Martials: The New Grapple Rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9243986" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Yes, right now I can just reskin the weapon. Because it is obviously not a balance thing. But now when I say I'm using a mace (sap) and I want to use a warhammer's stat's (push) is that going to be seen as a balance concern? When all three weapons were not really distinguished, there was no concern about swapping between them, because there was no mechanical distinction. Now, Warhammer's push. Maces sap. Can I just reflavor one as the other now? Will my request be seen as "opening the door" to trying to get a different mastery property? </p><p></p><p>And if all you really want are different named weapons... then reskinning was perfectly fine.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, Warhammer is still an option, it always was an option. But is Flail a serious option? 1-handed, 1d8 vs 1-handed, versatile 1d8(1d0) with the same mastery property (looking at Longsword), the only difference being the damage type which as we discussed wasn't a major distinction. </p><p></p><p>Weapon mastery has not made the flail more likely to be chosen, because a better option exists. Especially if you account for the elephant in the room that is magic items.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>See, there is a weird thing here. Have you checked the class abilities recently? Below is a list of all the classes which currently do not have 1st level access to Martial weapons. </p><p></p><p><em>Bard, Monk*, Rogue*, Sorcerer, Wizard</em></p><p></p><p>Now, from that list, there is only ONE class that also has Weapon Mastery. The Rogue, who, per the asterisk, has access to Finesse Martial weapons, and uses finesse to activate sneak attack. So... who is the character who will be using the Weapon Masteries of Simple Weapons if you do not believe anyone who has access to Martial Weapons would ever bother using Simple Weapons? And even if you decide to play a Cleric or a Druid who has no access to martial weapons... they ALSO don't have access to Weapon Masteries. </p><p></p><p>So, you've kind of logically forced yourself into a corner. No one with Weapon Masteries will use Simple Weapons, so the Simple Weapons can't be distinguished by their Weapon Masteries. You have... really accomplished nothing.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>When you make the selection at level 1, you have the choice between an option that has only one use, or an option that has potentially two uses. Sure, it is possible that second use will never come up, but you cannot know that for certain. So, you are making the claim that an option that has the potential to give you more versatility isn't superior, because you could maybe not use that versatility. But if you don't use it and the options are the same... why would you ever cut off that potential to do something else if you lose nothing to gain it?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, why are you certain that being able to swap to a different melee weapon is going to offer optimal play beyond what having a ranged option does? I've seen plenty of melee characters who are forced to use thrown or ranged weapons, but you seem to discount that this is possible.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But it isn't achieving that. </p><p></p><p>Heck, the vast majority of characters only get two attacks. What if you miss your first attack? Are you going to swap to a different weapon to use a different mastery after missing with your first? Also, you aren't trying new combinations, you are "Guy with Magic Sword who immediately sheathes it and pulls out their Magic Hammer" You are still using the sword first, defining yourself by the sword. Because you won't switch if you miss, you won't switch if you are attacking multiple people, and if you aren't switching... then you aren't exploring different archetypes or experimenting. You are just sticking with your primary weapon, like you always did, It just has a new trick.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That isn't what you said the first time. And throwing your dagger is worse than most other options you have for the majority of classes. Unless you think a thrown dagger beats Toll of The Dead or Firebolt.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why would you dual-wield with a shortsword and a dagger? It is worse than using the Scimitar, yes, even if you throw the dagger since you can draw the dagger as part of throwing it. </p><p></p><p>And, okay, you can now dual-wield a Shortsword and a Scimitar. You could do that before. Before that netted you two attacks of 1d6+mod. Now it is... two attacks of 1d6+mod... And the "incentive" is actually that dual-wielding Scimitars is useless (you can't double Nick) and so what you are really getting is... two shortswords, one each with a different mastery. Which is exactly what I am proposing.</p><p></p><p>And, since Rogues (the main people who will be dual-wielding these weapons) are also usually fighting at range, and only have two masteries.... what happens when they decide to have a Light Crossbow with Slow and only have the Scimitar and Nick for that free bonus action? Now you... don't have them really playing any different than they did before. </p><p></p><p>I've seen all the discussions about Weapon Masteries, and all the builds people propose... and they are largely the exact same builds, with one or two changes like "Shortsword + Scimitar". The goal of seeing wide-spread weapon changes and people playing with a lot of different weapons just... isn't going to happen from the system as it stands. And frankly, the best impact it HAS had has been on "making martials feel more dynamic in combat" and THAT is a great goal, and better achieved by altering the system. Because it will not be long until a large number of people are saying "I just want my character to use a hammer, can't I just have the flail sap mastery and the push mastery on my hammer instead of having to sheath my hammer, draw my flail, and make my attacks that way? It just seems silly to be constantly sheathing and drawing my weapons, and it won't change anything mechanically, because there is no action cost and no real mechanical difference between the two."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9243986, member: 6801228"] Yes, right now I can just reskin the weapon. Because it is obviously not a balance thing. But now when I say I'm using a mace (sap) and I want to use a warhammer's stat's (push) is that going to be seen as a balance concern? When all three weapons were not really distinguished, there was no concern about swapping between them, because there was no mechanical distinction. Now, Warhammer's push. Maces sap. Can I just reflavor one as the other now? Will my request be seen as "opening the door" to trying to get a different mastery property? And if all you really want are different named weapons... then reskinning was perfectly fine. Sure, Warhammer is still an option, it always was an option. But is Flail a serious option? 1-handed, 1d8 vs 1-handed, versatile 1d8(1d0) with the same mastery property (looking at Longsword), the only difference being the damage type which as we discussed wasn't a major distinction. Weapon mastery has not made the flail more likely to be chosen, because a better option exists. Especially if you account for the elephant in the room that is magic items. See, there is a weird thing here. Have you checked the class abilities recently? Below is a list of all the classes which currently do not have 1st level access to Martial weapons. [I]Bard, Monk*, Rogue*, Sorcerer, Wizard[/I] Now, from that list, there is only ONE class that also has Weapon Mastery. The Rogue, who, per the asterisk, has access to Finesse Martial weapons, and uses finesse to activate sneak attack. So... who is the character who will be using the Weapon Masteries of Simple Weapons if you do not believe anyone who has access to Martial Weapons would ever bother using Simple Weapons? And even if you decide to play a Cleric or a Druid who has no access to martial weapons... they ALSO don't have access to Weapon Masteries. So, you've kind of logically forced yourself into a corner. No one with Weapon Masteries will use Simple Weapons, so the Simple Weapons can't be distinguished by their Weapon Masteries. You have... really accomplished nothing. When you make the selection at level 1, you have the choice between an option that has only one use, or an option that has potentially two uses. Sure, it is possible that second use will never come up, but you cannot know that for certain. So, you are making the claim that an option that has the potential to give you more versatility isn't superior, because you could maybe not use that versatility. But if you don't use it and the options are the same... why would you ever cut off that potential to do something else if you lose nothing to gain it? So, why are you certain that being able to swap to a different melee weapon is going to offer optimal play beyond what having a ranged option does? I've seen plenty of melee characters who are forced to use thrown or ranged weapons, but you seem to discount that this is possible. But it isn't achieving that. Heck, the vast majority of characters only get two attacks. What if you miss your first attack? Are you going to swap to a different weapon to use a different mastery after missing with your first? Also, you aren't trying new combinations, you are "Guy with Magic Sword who immediately sheathes it and pulls out their Magic Hammer" You are still using the sword first, defining yourself by the sword. Because you won't switch if you miss, you won't switch if you are attacking multiple people, and if you aren't switching... then you aren't exploring different archetypes or experimenting. You are just sticking with your primary weapon, like you always did, It just has a new trick. That isn't what you said the first time. And throwing your dagger is worse than most other options you have for the majority of classes. Unless you think a thrown dagger beats Toll of The Dead or Firebolt. Why would you dual-wield with a shortsword and a dagger? It is worse than using the Scimitar, yes, even if you throw the dagger since you can draw the dagger as part of throwing it. And, okay, you can now dual-wield a Shortsword and a Scimitar. You could do that before. Before that netted you two attacks of 1d6+mod. Now it is... two attacks of 1d6+mod... And the "incentive" is actually that dual-wielding Scimitars is useless (you can't double Nick) and so what you are really getting is... two shortswords, one each with a different mastery. Which is exactly what I am proposing. And, since Rogues (the main people who will be dual-wielding these weapons) are also usually fighting at range, and only have two masteries.... what happens when they decide to have a Light Crossbow with Slow and only have the Scimitar and Nick for that free bonus action? Now you... don't have them really playing any different than they did before. I've seen all the discussions about Weapon Masteries, and all the builds people propose... and they are largely the exact same builds, with one or two changes like "Shortsword + Scimitar". The goal of seeing wide-spread weapon changes and people playing with a lot of different weapons just... isn't going to happen from the system as it stands. And frankly, the best impact it HAS had has been on "making martials feel more dynamic in combat" and THAT is a great goal, and better achieved by altering the system. Because it will not be long until a large number of people are saying "I just want my character to use a hammer, can't I just have the flail sap mastery and the push mastery on my hammer instead of having to sheath my hammer, draw my flail, and make my attacks that way? It just seems silly to be constantly sheathing and drawing my weapons, and it won't change anything mechanically, because there is no action cost and no real mechanical difference between the two." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Great Nerf to High Level Martials: The New Grapple Rules
Top