Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The "L" Word (Lazy) and Armchair Quarterbacking
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hawk Diesel" data-source="post: 7278675" data-attributes="member: 59848"><p>Ok, so this is a weird topic admittedly. It isn't <em>quite</em> role playing specific, but I've seen a couple of threads spin off the rails when someone uses the word lazy. In fact, I was on one end of such a heated argument (I used the "L" word in regards to a recently released Unearthed Arcana) with [MENTION=6801328]Elfcrusher[/MENTION] on the other side (no hard feelings by the way). Anyways, it seems that once someone begins to use the word lazy, you have individuals fiercely coming to the defense of the product, editor, or author, and then you have individuals digging in regarding their opinion of the work. People get riled up and triggered, "arm-chair quarterback" and "strawman" start getting thrown around, and suddenly the thread becomes something entirely different than what it was meant to become.</p><p></p><p>So I'm legitimately curious about this phenomenon. I'm not trying to start an argument or get people triggered. I genuinely would like to know people's thoughts. At what point is criticism legitimate, and at what point does it cross a line? When is it ok for a person to vent their frustration with a product (regardless if they use the "L" word or not), and when does it really become an attack? </p><p></p><p>I understand the internet adds a layer of anonymity, and research shows that without consequences or identity people generally trend towards becoming terrible versions of themselves. But we are also consumers and may have a level of expectation or standard of excellence. And maybe that line changes if you've been playing a while or are new. Maybe it changes if you have experience working on an RPG. But many of us seem to be passionate about this hobby, and that seems to create a powder keg situation when that passion comes out to put us on different sides of how we love and express our love for this game.</p><p></p><p>And then, there is the idea of the armchair quarterback. Because we do not necessarily engage in professional RPG development, or editing, or whatever, do we have less room to criticize the product or body of work? I'm no chef, but if I spend money and order a dish I don't like or I feel underwhelmed by, I don't feel like I need to be a chef to complain. And for me as I read and experience these arguments, there seems to be a sense that it changes when RPGs are involved. Does it still count as armchair QB'ing if a person regularly posts homebrew content on the forum and leave it open for feedback and criticism? What about people that create for the DMGuild? If I criticize a senator for their voting record, do I have less room to criticize them because I am not trying to run for Senate?</p><p></p><p>Once again, not trying to troll or trigger people, but these are some of the thoughts that come to mind as I have been through these arguments and I'm really curious about how the community sees these things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hawk Diesel, post: 7278675, member: 59848"] Ok, so this is a weird topic admittedly. It isn't [I]quite[/I] role playing specific, but I've seen a couple of threads spin off the rails when someone uses the word lazy. In fact, I was on one end of such a heated argument (I used the "L" word in regards to a recently released Unearthed Arcana) with [MENTION=6801328]Elfcrusher[/MENTION] on the other side (no hard feelings by the way). Anyways, it seems that once someone begins to use the word lazy, you have individuals fiercely coming to the defense of the product, editor, or author, and then you have individuals digging in regarding their opinion of the work. People get riled up and triggered, "arm-chair quarterback" and "strawman" start getting thrown around, and suddenly the thread becomes something entirely different than what it was meant to become. So I'm legitimately curious about this phenomenon. I'm not trying to start an argument or get people triggered. I genuinely would like to know people's thoughts. At what point is criticism legitimate, and at what point does it cross a line? When is it ok for a person to vent their frustration with a product (regardless if they use the "L" word or not), and when does it really become an attack? I understand the internet adds a layer of anonymity, and research shows that without consequences or identity people generally trend towards becoming terrible versions of themselves. But we are also consumers and may have a level of expectation or standard of excellence. And maybe that line changes if you've been playing a while or are new. Maybe it changes if you have experience working on an RPG. But many of us seem to be passionate about this hobby, and that seems to create a powder keg situation when that passion comes out to put us on different sides of how we love and express our love for this game. And then, there is the idea of the armchair quarterback. Because we do not necessarily engage in professional RPG development, or editing, or whatever, do we have less room to criticize the product or body of work? I'm no chef, but if I spend money and order a dish I don't like or I feel underwhelmed by, I don't feel like I need to be a chef to complain. And for me as I read and experience these arguments, there seems to be a sense that it changes when RPGs are involved. Does it still count as armchair QB'ing if a person regularly posts homebrew content on the forum and leave it open for feedback and criticism? What about people that create for the DMGuild? If I criticize a senator for their voting record, do I have less room to criticize them because I am not trying to run for Senate? Once again, not trying to troll or trigger people, but these are some of the thoughts that come to mind as I have been through these arguments and I'm really curious about how the community sees these things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The "L" Word (Lazy) and Armchair Quarterbacking
Top