Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
The new OGL 1.2, What is Victory?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="robconley" data-source="post: 8907927" data-attributes="member: 5636"><p><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgsIxhdCoa1-yrwl8m8YFBk8om2ZVZP-s1GhnB80nkXwsMha_oTt_TMMpEehysM-Mu6hQxYa69A3pmpSG2gZvegfhlNXw90Y4cI-Kciz5lDUPkFjdqW_MoAQqd_pCQXTBs9tGiugxeYC4ZS4ce8Nqh-9pjqHj7zRSZTX2XX7TS6YXNZkFKDv-K3UnSCAg" target="_blank"><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgsIxhdCoa1-yrwl8m8YFBk8om2ZVZP-s1GhnB80nkXwsMha_oTt_TMMpEehysM-Mu6hQxYa69A3pmpSG2gZvegfhlNXw90Y4cI-Kciz5lDUPkFjdqW_MoAQqd_pCQXTBs9tGiugxeYC4ZS4ce8Nqh-9pjqHj7zRSZTX2XX7TS6YXNZkFKDv-K3UnSCAg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p></p><p>I thank you for taking the time to read this post. This hobby is supposed to be a fun pastime even when it is part of one's livelihood. The past two weeks have been anything but fun. So I appreciate the time you spent reading this post amid the many outraged voices making themselves heard.</p><p></p><h3><strong>The OGL 1.2</strong></h3><p></p><p>Today Wizards finally laid some of their cards on the table and offered a proposed OGL 1.2. </p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/1432-starting-the-ogl-playtest" target="_blank">Starting the OGL "Playtest"</a></p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.drivethrurpg.com/browse/pub/2993/Bat-in-the-Attic-Games" target="_blank">As an OSR publisher</a>, several things stand out to me.</p><p></p><p><strong><em>DnD and Creative Commons License</em></strong></p><p></p><p>I edited the <a href="http://media.wizards.com/2016/downloads/DND/SRD-OGL_V5.1.pdf" target="_blank">D&D 5.1 SRD</a> into three sections corresponding to the page numbers above. You can browse them at this link. </p><p></p><p><a href="https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1flntOVXMSdtroyYCvpciw-K8oApHRHiP?usp=sharing" target="_blank">Proposed Creative Common DnD mechanics</a></p><p></p><p>What they didn't release is most of the "lists" that comprise DnD 5e. Only the Equipment List is part of the CC-BY content they plan to release. Classes, Spells, Monsters, and Magic Items are not.</p><p></p><p>Overall this is a positive step. If nothing else is gained and they follow through on this, then moving away from the OGL becomes that much easier for the OSR. It would make what I need to do with the Majestic Fantasy RPG a lot more straightforward.</p><p></p><p><strong><em>Deauthorization</em></strong></p><p>They also planning to add a notice deauthorizing the OGL 1.0a</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Note the after (effective date), the intent here is to allow folks to continue selling or offering what has been previously released under the OGL 1.0a. Unfortunately, it cuts us off from building on or continuing the work we have been doing for the past 23 years.</p><p></p><p>Current authors and publishers can change the license on their original content, but for those who moved on to other pursuits or are no longer with us, this is not an option. Their work will remain unavailable to use until they enter the public domain decades from now. </p><p></p><p>I consider this unacceptable. </p><p></p><p><strong><em>The D20 SRD</em></strong></p><p>The D20 SRD is gone as a result of this section. Wizards wants to change the license for the 5.1 SRD and remove access to the d20 SRD THIS YEAR. This is not a "wait until OneDnD is released" proposal. Although they might build in a grace period. This section is from the actual license.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Likewise I consider this unacceptable for anything other than future Wizard's content.</p><p></p><p><strong><em>Rob's Note:</em></strong> While the OSR relied on a stripped-down version of the D20 SRD, the same "hack" applies to the CC-BY content they plan to release although some spell names and monster names will have to change. </p><p></p><p><strong>Other considerations</strong></p><p>I did not touch on other areas as they don't impact my work as a OSR publisher. I do not plan ever to use the OGL 1.2 for my creative works. I recommend looking to others for more details on those clauses. However, one clause needs to be addressed. </p><p></p><p><strong><em>The Morality Clause</em></strong></p><p>The proposed OGL 1.2 license contains the following provision </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This to me is unacceptable. I<a href="https://batintheattic.blogspot.com/2020/02/concerning-judges-guild.html" target="_blank"> want to be clear about where I am coming from</a>. A few years back I had to deal with racism, anti-Semitism, and hate speech from an individual I licensed IP from. <a href="https://batintheattic.blogspot.com/2022/08/concerning-judges-guild-to-all-things.html" target="_blank">I paid the price for my principles as well</a>. Seeing my income from RPG material dropping from hundreds of dollars per month to tens of dollars per month. </p><p></p><p>Surrendering freedom, creative or otherwise, to an oligarchy like Wizards of the Coast will not solve the problems of racism and hate. Instead, their bias and their prejudices are substituted for your own moral compass. By agreeing to the OGL 1.2, you surrender your moral authority to them. More importantly, you surrender it to their successors. Unknown individuals who may not share your ideals, and your belief in what is right, just, and fair. </p><p></p><p>Each of you reading this will have to decide for yourself what is the right course of action. For myself, I will not surrender my right to act in the manner I see fit, in the form I see fit. I have done so in the past, and I will do it again as circumstances dictate. I am not special in this, each of you reading this has the power to do the same.</p><p></p><p>For more a detailed essay on the problems of morality clauses and conduct codes, I recommend this guest essay by <a href="https://www.tenkarstavern.com/2023/01/guest-poster-james-raggi-iv-on.html" target="_blank">James Raggi on the Tenkar's Tavern blog</a>. Also look up the details on the following: The <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hays_Code" target="_blank">Hays Code</a>, and the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comics_Code_Authority" target="_blank">Comic Code Authority</a>. Each was born of a generation's belief in what was right, just, and decent. </p><p></p><p>Then ask yourself as James Raggi said, were the marginalized served by these codes? Will the marginalized be served by the code as set forth by Chris Cock CEO of Hasbro, Cynthia Williams CEO of WoTC, and their successors? Or are you the better judge of these matters? </p><h3>What is Victory?</h3><p>We won a battle but not the war for our creative legacy. In the words of Churchill, </p><p></p><p>I realize for some of you these are not the words you want to hear. You want the hobby to be fun again. Publishers are grasping for any type of certainty for their livelihood. You want this to end sooner than later. </p><p></p><p>So how does this end for me?</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Wizards acknowledge OGL 1.0a as an <strong>authorized irrevocable license</strong>.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">That all past open content remains open content under the OGL 1.0a and free to be used as they have been for the past 23 years. Works like the D20 3.0 and 3.5 SRD. The 5e 5.1 SRD as well remains under the OGL 1a.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In turn, I will acknowledge they have the right to license OneDnD any way they like. However, I reserve the right to make critical comments about their creative and legal choices.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The plan to release various sections under the CC-BY 4.0 license be followed through.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">That Chris Cocks, CEO of Hasbro, and Cynthia William, CEO of Wizards of the Coast, each write and sign individual formal apologies to all the publishers impacted by their overreach and inept handling of the situation such as Paizo, Kobold Press, Troll Lord Games, Green Ronin, Gaming Ballistic, Frog God Games, and many others. </li> </ul><p>Fight On!</p><p></p><p>Robert Conley</p><p>Bat in the Attic Games</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="robconley, post: 8907927, member: 5636"] [URL='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgsIxhdCoa1-yrwl8m8YFBk8om2ZVZP-s1GhnB80nkXwsMha_oTt_TMMpEehysM-Mu6hQxYa69A3pmpSG2gZvegfhlNXw90Y4cI-Kciz5lDUPkFjdqW_MoAQqd_pCQXTBs9tGiugxeYC4ZS4ce8Nqh-9pjqHj7zRSZTX2XX7TS6YXNZkFKDv-K3UnSCAg'][IMG]https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgsIxhdCoa1-yrwl8m8YFBk8om2ZVZP-s1GhnB80nkXwsMha_oTt_TMMpEehysM-Mu6hQxYa69A3pmpSG2gZvegfhlNXw90Y4cI-Kciz5lDUPkFjdqW_MoAQqd_pCQXTBs9tGiugxeYC4ZS4ce8Nqh-9pjqHj7zRSZTX2XX7TS6YXNZkFKDv-K3UnSCAg[/IMG][/URL] I thank you for taking the time to read this post. This hobby is supposed to be a fun pastime even when it is part of one's livelihood. The past two weeks have been anything but fun. So I appreciate the time you spent reading this post amid the many outraged voices making themselves heard. [HEADING=2][B]The OGL 1.2[/B][/HEADING] Today Wizards finally laid some of their cards on the table and offered a proposed OGL 1.2. [URL='https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/1432-starting-the-ogl-playtest']Starting the OGL "Playtest"[/URL] [URL='https://www.drivethrurpg.com/browse/pub/2993/Bat-in-the-Attic-Games']As an OSR publisher[/URL], several things stand out to me. [B][I]DnD and Creative Commons License[/I][/B] I edited the [URL='http://media.wizards.com/2016/downloads/DND/SRD-OGL_V5.1.pdf']D&D 5.1 SRD[/URL] into three sections corresponding to the page numbers above. You can browse them at this link. [URL='https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1flntOVXMSdtroyYCvpciw-K8oApHRHiP?usp=sharing']Proposed Creative Common DnD mechanics[/URL] What they didn't release is most of the "lists" that comprise DnD 5e. Only the Equipment List is part of the CC-BY content they plan to release. Classes, Spells, Monsters, and Magic Items are not. Overall this is a positive step. If nothing else is gained and they follow through on this, then moving away from the OGL becomes that much easier for the OSR. It would make what I need to do with the Majestic Fantasy RPG a lot more straightforward. [B][I]Deauthorization[/I][/B] They also planning to add a notice deauthorizing the OGL 1.0a Note the after (effective date), the intent here is to allow folks to continue selling or offering what has been previously released under the OGL 1.0a. Unfortunately, it cuts us off from building on or continuing the work we have been doing for the past 23 years. Current authors and publishers can change the license on their original content, but for those who moved on to other pursuits or are no longer with us, this is not an option. Their work will remain unavailable to use until they enter the public domain decades from now. I consider this unacceptable. [B][I]The D20 SRD[/I][/B] The D20 SRD is gone as a result of this section. Wizards wants to change the license for the 5.1 SRD and remove access to the d20 SRD THIS YEAR. This is not a "wait until OneDnD is released" proposal. Although they might build in a grace period. This section is from the actual license. Likewise I consider this unacceptable for anything other than future Wizard's content. [B][I]Rob's Note:[/I][/B] While the OSR relied on a stripped-down version of the D20 SRD, the same "hack" applies to the CC-BY content they plan to release although some spell names and monster names will have to change. [B]Other considerations[/B] I did not touch on other areas as they don't impact my work as a OSR publisher. I do not plan ever to use the OGL 1.2 for my creative works. I recommend looking to others for more details on those clauses. However, one clause needs to be addressed. [B][I]The Morality Clause[/I][/B] The proposed OGL 1.2 license contains the following provision This to me is unacceptable. I[URL='https://batintheattic.blogspot.com/2020/02/concerning-judges-guild.html'] want to be clear about where I am coming from[/URL]. A few years back I had to deal with racism, anti-Semitism, and hate speech from an individual I licensed IP from. [URL='https://batintheattic.blogspot.com/2022/08/concerning-judges-guild-to-all-things.html']I paid the price for my principles as well[/URL]. Seeing my income from RPG material dropping from hundreds of dollars per month to tens of dollars per month. Surrendering freedom, creative or otherwise, to an oligarchy like Wizards of the Coast will not solve the problems of racism and hate. Instead, their bias and their prejudices are substituted for your own moral compass. By agreeing to the OGL 1.2, you surrender your moral authority to them. More importantly, you surrender it to their successors. Unknown individuals who may not share your ideals, and your belief in what is right, just, and fair. Each of you reading this will have to decide for yourself what is the right course of action. For myself, I will not surrender my right to act in the manner I see fit, in the form I see fit. I have done so in the past, and I will do it again as circumstances dictate. I am not special in this, each of you reading this has the power to do the same. For more a detailed essay on the problems of morality clauses and conduct codes, I recommend this guest essay by [URL='https://www.tenkarstavern.com/2023/01/guest-poster-james-raggi-iv-on.html']James Raggi on the Tenkar's Tavern blog[/URL]. Also look up the details on the following: The [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hays_Code']Hays Code[/URL], and the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comics_Code_Authority']Comic Code Authority[/URL]. Each was born of a generation's belief in what was right, just, and decent. Then ask yourself as James Raggi said, were the marginalized served by these codes? Will the marginalized be served by the code as set forth by Chris Cock CEO of Hasbro, Cynthia Williams CEO of WoTC, and their successors? Or are you the better judge of these matters? [HEADING=2]What is Victory?[/HEADING] We won a battle but not the war for our creative legacy. In the words of Churchill, I realize for some of you these are not the words you want to hear. You want the hobby to be fun again. Publishers are grasping for any type of certainty for their livelihood. You want this to end sooner than later. So how does this end for me? [LIST] [*]Wizards acknowledge OGL 1.0a as an [B]authorized irrevocable license[/B]. [*]That all past open content remains open content under the OGL 1.0a and free to be used as they have been for the past 23 years. Works like the D20 3.0 and 3.5 SRD. The 5e 5.1 SRD as well remains under the OGL 1a. [*]In turn, I will acknowledge they have the right to license OneDnD any way they like. However, I reserve the right to make critical comments about their creative and legal choices. [*]The plan to release various sections under the CC-BY 4.0 license be followed through. [*]That Chris Cocks, CEO of Hasbro, and Cynthia William, CEO of Wizards of the Coast, each write and sign individual formal apologies to all the publishers impacted by their overreach and inept handling of the situation such as Paizo, Kobold Press, Troll Lord Games, Green Ronin, Gaming Ballistic, Frog God Games, and many others. [/LIST] Fight On! Robert Conley Bat in the Attic Games [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
The new OGL 1.2, What is Victory?
Top