Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Real problem with 3e D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="3d6" data-source="post: 3384054" data-attributes="member: 12715"><p>I feel like the recombinance problem could be solved pretty easily in a new edition.</p><p></p><p>A lot of buffing effects are much more complicated than they need to be. As has been mentioned, barbarian rage is a good example of this. Rage primarily gives a bonus on attacks and damage, as well as hit points and Fortitude saves. However, it also give incidental bonuses to a large number of other things which are not particularly important in the context of a short-duration combat buff. Rage could be changed so that it gave a +2 bonus to attack and damage rolls and temporary hit points equal to twice your barbarian level. The primary effect of barbarian rage would remain, but the changes that need to be made to your character when you used it would be simpler.</p><p></p><p>Another factor making buffing effects more complicated is the bonus stacking rules. The game would be much simpler if there were stacking rules inside a class of effects, but different classes of effects always stacked. Here's what I mean. Lets say I have a normal array of defensive magical items, and I have <em>protection from evil</em> cast on me. I need to check to see if I have any resistance bonuses to saves or deflection bonuses to AC from my items to see what effect (if any) <em>protection from evil</em> has on those statistics.</p><p></p><p>I would make two major changes to this system. First, I would reduce the number of bonus types. Many bonus types are so uncommon (such as sacred or luck) that they essentially stack with everything. I would convert all bonuses of these types into unnamed bonuses. This would leave me with armor, shield, natural armor, dodge, resistance, deflection, and enhancement bonuses (there would be a design rule stating that no new bonus types are to be added in rules expansions as well). Second, I would change the rules so that stacking rules only apply within their own class of effects. For example, two magical items providing a deflection bonus to AC would not stack, as they are both magical items. However, a magical item and a spell providing a deflection bonus would stack, as they are different classes of effect (magical item and spell). This would mean that you would only need to check magic item stacking when you change your magic items, not every time a spell was cast upon you, and you would only need to check spell stacking when you had more than one spell effect in place.</p><p></p><p>The final problem is short-duration buffs require more bookkeeping than seems needed. I would change the duration of short-duration buffing effects (loosely defined as buffing effects with a duration of less than 10 minutes/level) into subjective durations, such as "1 encounter" or "1 combat". That way, the primary balancing factor of short-duration buffing spells (the actions lost in combat) would be maintained, but the need for tracking very short durations such as 3 or 5 rounds would no longer exist.</p><p></p><p>Another option would be to eliminate stacking rules, give linear costs for magic items bonuses (instead of exponential costs), and make sure all combat buffs only last for 1 combat.</p><p></p><p>Finally, there needs to be a <a href="http://aoerat.com/dnd/gen/index.php" target="_blank">free, web-based utility for adding templates and HD to monsters</a>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="3d6, post: 3384054, member: 12715"] I feel like the recombinance problem could be solved pretty easily in a new edition. A lot of buffing effects are much more complicated than they need to be. As has been mentioned, barbarian rage is a good example of this. Rage primarily gives a bonus on attacks and damage, as well as hit points and Fortitude saves. However, it also give incidental bonuses to a large number of other things which are not particularly important in the context of a short-duration combat buff. Rage could be changed so that it gave a +2 bonus to attack and damage rolls and temporary hit points equal to twice your barbarian level. The primary effect of barbarian rage would remain, but the changes that need to be made to your character when you used it would be simpler. Another factor making buffing effects more complicated is the bonus stacking rules. The game would be much simpler if there were stacking rules inside a class of effects, but different classes of effects always stacked. Here's what I mean. Lets say I have a normal array of defensive magical items, and I have [i]protection from evil[/i] cast on me. I need to check to see if I have any resistance bonuses to saves or deflection bonuses to AC from my items to see what effect (if any) [i]protection from evil[/i] has on those statistics. I would make two major changes to this system. First, I would reduce the number of bonus types. Many bonus types are so uncommon (such as sacred or luck) that they essentially stack with everything. I would convert all bonuses of these types into unnamed bonuses. This would leave me with armor, shield, natural armor, dodge, resistance, deflection, and enhancement bonuses (there would be a design rule stating that no new bonus types are to be added in rules expansions as well). Second, I would change the rules so that stacking rules only apply within their own class of effects. For example, two magical items providing a deflection bonus to AC would not stack, as they are both magical items. However, a magical item and a spell providing a deflection bonus would stack, as they are different classes of effect (magical item and spell). This would mean that you would only need to check magic item stacking when you change your magic items, not every time a spell was cast upon you, and you would only need to check spell stacking when you had more than one spell effect in place. The final problem is short-duration buffs require more bookkeeping than seems needed. I would change the duration of short-duration buffing effects (loosely defined as buffing effects with a duration of less than 10 minutes/level) into subjective durations, such as "1 encounter" or "1 combat". That way, the primary balancing factor of short-duration buffing spells (the actions lost in combat) would be maintained, but the need for tracking very short durations such as 3 or 5 rounds would no longer exist. Another option would be to eliminate stacking rules, give linear costs for magic items bonuses (instead of exponential costs), and make sure all combat buffs only last for 1 combat. Finally, there needs to be a [url=http://aoerat.com/dnd/gen/index.php]free, web-based utility for adding templates and HD to monsters[/url]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Real problem with 3e D&D
Top