Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Warrior
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quickleaf" data-source="post: 7221468" data-attributes="member: 20323"><p>It's a good question. My approach is much more focused on design elegance and smoothness of play at the table. It's intended to be swapped out for the 5e fighter for groups who feel that the fighter's design leaves something wanting. So, for my purposes, a GURPS/M&M-esque point-buy power creation would be just as undesirable as a glut of 4e-style powers – because it's inelegant, slow, and likely requires more mental attention than most players want to devote when the action is running hot.</p><p></p><p>Now, as for "stunt dice" that empower improvised actions, that sounds a lot like the Superiority Dice of the Battle Master Fighter. That's already there as an option for players who like resource tracking for their fighters. There are plenty of fighter homebrews out there that expound on the Superiority Dice concept & make it a core class feature. I consider "stunt dice" part of the "OK enough" design behind the fighter because it drops the narrative ball. WHY can I only parry up to 4 times in a combat and have that mean something mechanically? There's no narrative reason.</p><p></p><p>When you get into limited-use abilities, you really press up against that narrative barrier. Spellcasting has "spell energy", but nowhere in the history of D&D (until 4e) was the fighter associated with limited-use abilities. By limited use I mean X/day or X/rest. HOWEVER, it is possible to design narratively meaningful limitations on abilities without resorting to X/day or X/rest – see my design of <strong>Parry</strong> for an example.</p><p></p><p>[SECTION]<strong>Parry.</strong> At 1st level, when you are hit with a melee attack, you can parry the blow using your Reaction so long as you are wielding a weapon or shield. In order to parry, make an attack roll. If your roll equals or exceeds the attacker’s roll, reduce the damage of the attack by an amount equal to 1d10 + your warrior level. If you take damage from an attack you only partially managed to parry, your guard is broken and you cannot use Parry again until using an action to catch your breath and reestablish your guard.[/SECTION]</p><p></p><p>There's also legacy reasons to include differentiation of abilities by weapon, which date back to the origins of the game. And it makes sense. The fighter is the one we strongly associate with weapon specialization. That's its DNA. I chose to reach into BD&D and 4e for inspiration because those were the editions where differentiation by weapon was most interesting (i.e. more than +# attack, +# damage for specialization).</p><p></p><p>I don't think it's anymore limiting to say "fighters who want to set a weapon against a charge need to fight with a spear" than it is to say "wizards who want to knock enemies backward need to prepare <em>thunderwave</em>." It's part of the D&D DNA. It's a way to differentiate characters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quickleaf, post: 7221468, member: 20323"] It's a good question. My approach is much more focused on design elegance and smoothness of play at the table. It's intended to be swapped out for the 5e fighter for groups who feel that the fighter's design leaves something wanting. So, for my purposes, a GURPS/M&M-esque point-buy power creation would be just as undesirable as a glut of 4e-style powers – because it's inelegant, slow, and likely requires more mental attention than most players want to devote when the action is running hot. Now, as for "stunt dice" that empower improvised actions, that sounds a lot like the Superiority Dice of the Battle Master Fighter. That's already there as an option for players who like resource tracking for their fighters. There are plenty of fighter homebrews out there that expound on the Superiority Dice concept & make it a core class feature. I consider "stunt dice" part of the "OK enough" design behind the fighter because it drops the narrative ball. WHY can I only parry up to 4 times in a combat and have that mean something mechanically? There's no narrative reason. When you get into limited-use abilities, you really press up against that narrative barrier. Spellcasting has "spell energy", but nowhere in the history of D&D (until 4e) was the fighter associated with limited-use abilities. By limited use I mean X/day or X/rest. HOWEVER, it is possible to design narratively meaningful limitations on abilities without resorting to X/day or X/rest – see my design of [B]Parry[/B] for an example. [SECTION][b]Parry.[/b] At 1st level, when you are hit with a melee attack, you can parry the blow using your Reaction so long as you are wielding a weapon or shield. In order to parry, make an attack roll. If your roll equals or exceeds the attacker’s roll, reduce the damage of the attack by an amount equal to 1d10 + your warrior level. If you take damage from an attack you only partially managed to parry, your guard is broken and you cannot use Parry again until using an action to catch your breath and reestablish your guard.[/SECTION] There's also legacy reasons to include differentiation of abilities by weapon, which date back to the origins of the game. And it makes sense. The fighter is the one we strongly associate with weapon specialization. That's its DNA. I chose to reach into BD&D and 4e for inspiration because those were the editions where differentiation by weapon was most interesting (i.e. more than +# attack, +# damage for specialization). I don't think it's anymore limiting to say "fighters who want to set a weapon against a charge need to fight with a spear" than it is to say "wizards who want to knock enemies backward need to prepare [I]thunderwave[/I]." It's part of the D&D DNA. It's a way to differentiate characters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Warrior
Top