Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
This Week in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gweinel" data-source="post: 6032683" data-attributes="member: 2165"><p>I a bit worried on where the game goes and this L&L didn't reassured me. </p><p></p><p>There are some things that i liked, some that i didn't and some things that i have to wait and see how they are implemented. </p><p></p><p>The thing that worries me most is that as the game goes is that my prefered style of game isn't gonna be supported. My prefered style is a low magic gritty game. Having already played the test this kind of game isn't supported. The feeling that i got when I played the game is of a super heroic game. All the things were too easy for them. The foes were easy, the skills were easy and the healing was too much and not "realistic" (for my fantasy standards ofc). The magic traditions also as they are gonna be, but probably they will be useless to me. Mearls has previously said that old styled vancian sytstem is gonna supported with the traditions but after this L&L i am wondering how it will come since having encounter and at will spells will not make the magic feel more unique for my game. [MENTION=2067]Kamikaze Midget[/MENTION] in a previous post had presented perfect the feeling of the magic that i like <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/news/329256-mike-mearls-paladin-ranger-wizard-arcane-tradition-walk-into-tavern-2.html#post6014224" target="_blank">link</a></p><p></p><p>The funny thing is one of my best things that i liked in the playtest, the sorceror (along with warlock), is gonna change dramaticaly. I don't know if it will be for good or for bad but if they take from you an element that you like then you get pissed of. </p><p></p><p>Turning to the positive things of the article, i like the mentioned changes of cleric although i hadn't any problem with the class in the playtest. Also i am glad that they decided to remove the autosuccess of the rogue. </p><p></p><p>I noted that a constant complain of my gaming group isn't adressed. They wanted to be able to get more skills as they level up. Mearls did not say a word about that. </p><p></p><p>Although I like many things of the 5e like backgrounds and specialties the game as it stands now doesn't support my style. 3e did better job on that although it is far from a perfect system. </p><p>I am waiting...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gweinel, post: 6032683, member: 2165"] I a bit worried on where the game goes and this L&L didn't reassured me. There are some things that i liked, some that i didn't and some things that i have to wait and see how they are implemented. The thing that worries me most is that as the game goes is that my prefered style of game isn't gonna be supported. My prefered style is a low magic gritty game. Having already played the test this kind of game isn't supported. The feeling that i got when I played the game is of a super heroic game. All the things were too easy for them. The foes were easy, the skills were easy and the healing was too much and not "realistic" (for my fantasy standards ofc). The magic traditions also as they are gonna be, but probably they will be useless to me. Mearls has previously said that old styled vancian sytstem is gonna supported with the traditions but after this L&L i am wondering how it will come since having encounter and at will spells will not make the magic feel more unique for my game. [MENTION=2067]Kamikaze Midget[/MENTION] in a previous post had presented perfect the feeling of the magic that i like [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/news/329256-mike-mearls-paladin-ranger-wizard-arcane-tradition-walk-into-tavern-2.html#post6014224"]link[/URL] The funny thing is one of my best things that i liked in the playtest, the sorceror (along with warlock), is gonna change dramaticaly. I don't know if it will be for good or for bad but if they take from you an element that you like then you get pissed of. Turning to the positive things of the article, i like the mentioned changes of cleric although i hadn't any problem with the class in the playtest. Also i am glad that they decided to remove the autosuccess of the rogue. I noted that a constant complain of my gaming group isn't adressed. They wanted to be able to get more skills as they level up. Mearls did not say a word about that. Although I like many things of the 5e like backgrounds and specialties the game as it stands now doesn't support my style. 3e did better job on that although it is far from a perfect system. I am waiting... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
This Week in D&D
Top