Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tower Shield and Shield Bearer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 738500" data-attributes="member: 5890"><p>My point of view - the tower shield, as errata'd, isn't something worth using for anyone who isn't a spellcaster. Furthermore, it destroys the whole "no facings" ideal of 3rd ed.</p><p></p><p>Put it back to how it was written - it gives a flat cover bonus from all directions while held (after all - shield bonuses apply to all directions...). A limit on the amount of cover which can be taken (up to 3/4, max, which assumes you're taking 9/10ths cover most of the time, but ducking out of it to attack). Finally ditch the last couple of advantages of cover over a shield bonus - ie immunity to AoO's, reflex bonuses (especially since this almost never applies - remember the argument that a spell targets the whole person?).</p><p></p><p>That's it. No penalties to the wielders attacks. After all - it's a shield. Do other shields give you a penalty to your attacks?</p><p></p><p>Finally, lets just drop that whole 'cover' designation. It differs from cover so much that there's not reall a reason to keep the name.</p><p></p><p>What do we end up with? A shield with a +7 ac bonus. That's it. Simple, huh?</p><p></p><p>The only real problem: Someone can get a tower shield and full plate mail at low leve, and walk about with a 25AC.</p><p></p><p>The solution: not caring. The guy has a -16 dex penalty to such elementary things as balance. This outfit is really only suitable to outright war, and even then requires someone who is skilled at standing up. I'd suggest giving balance to the fighter class, making high level fighters the only real choice for this combination of gear. Incidentally it also makes their AC fairly competitive at the levels where they can wear this for adventuring.</p><p></p><p>As to tower shields only being used in a besieging situation? Three words.</p><p></p><p>The Roman Legionary.</p><p></p><p>Tower shields plus short swords, arranged in a formation which devastated pretty much anything it came up against.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Saeviomagy, post: 738500, member: 5890"] My point of view - the tower shield, as errata'd, isn't something worth using for anyone who isn't a spellcaster. Furthermore, it destroys the whole "no facings" ideal of 3rd ed. Put it back to how it was written - it gives a flat cover bonus from all directions while held (after all - shield bonuses apply to all directions...). A limit on the amount of cover which can be taken (up to 3/4, max, which assumes you're taking 9/10ths cover most of the time, but ducking out of it to attack). Finally ditch the last couple of advantages of cover over a shield bonus - ie immunity to AoO's, reflex bonuses (especially since this almost never applies - remember the argument that a spell targets the whole person?). That's it. No penalties to the wielders attacks. After all - it's a shield. Do other shields give you a penalty to your attacks? Finally, lets just drop that whole 'cover' designation. It differs from cover so much that there's not reall a reason to keep the name. What do we end up with? A shield with a +7 ac bonus. That's it. Simple, huh? The only real problem: Someone can get a tower shield and full plate mail at low leve, and walk about with a 25AC. The solution: not caring. The guy has a -16 dex penalty to such elementary things as balance. This outfit is really only suitable to outright war, and even then requires someone who is skilled at standing up. I'd suggest giving balance to the fighter class, making high level fighters the only real choice for this combination of gear. Incidentally it also makes their AC fairly competitive at the levels where they can wear this for adventuring. As to tower shields only being used in a besieging situation? Three words. The Roman Legionary. Tower shields plus short swords, arranged in a formation which devastated pretty much anything it came up against. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tower Shield and Shield Bearer
Top