Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[+]What Characters Are You Excited to Build?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 9257027" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>Do you really think the game needs to accommodate people that have thier character refuse to use a ranged weapon?</p><p></p><p>I just hard disagree. I’d rather see the Ranger get melee and ranged oriented features, and would consider the melee ones something to fall back on if playing an archer.</p><p></p><p>This is a general mindset level difference, so we might as well leave it at what we have said. </p><p></p><p>Well, the HM spell doesn’t have to exist or do what it currently does, but regardless, why shouldn’t the Ranger have the effects of hunters mark on a creature x/day free with the ability to burn thier main limited resource to use the feature again if needed? </p><p></p><p>There are things that would go too far, but it’s not like they tried to make Sneak Attack a spell. They floated the notion of Spellcasting classes having more of thier class be expressed via spells. </p><p></p><p>Agreed</p><p></p><p>I genuinely don’t understand why CB would have been an issue for you. It wasn’t enough feature to hold up a level, but other than that, it’s another tool. </p><p></p><p>Your summoning of them is a spell. They are not a spell. </p><p></p><p>Eh, I disagree.</p><p></p><p>Getting features that fill a gap in your arsenal is a good thing. </p><p></p><p>I don’t share this hangup. It is what you describe it as, just like artificers are generally understood to be activating and using their artifices when they “cast a spell”.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 9257027, member: 6704184"] Do you really think the game needs to accommodate people that have thier character refuse to use a ranged weapon? I just hard disagree. I’d rather see the Ranger get melee and ranged oriented features, and would consider the melee ones something to fall back on if playing an archer. This is a general mindset level difference, so we might as well leave it at what we have said. Well, the HM spell doesn’t have to exist or do what it currently does, but regardless, why shouldn’t the Ranger have the effects of hunters mark on a creature x/day free with the ability to burn thier main limited resource to use the feature again if needed? There are things that would go too far, but it’s not like they tried to make Sneak Attack a spell. They floated the notion of Spellcasting classes having more of thier class be expressed via spells. Agreed I genuinely don’t understand why CB would have been an issue for you. It wasn’t enough feature to hold up a level, but other than that, it’s another tool. Your summoning of them is a spell. They are not a spell. Eh, I disagree. Getting features that fill a gap in your arsenal is a good thing. I don’t share this hangup. It is what you describe it as, just like artificers are generally understood to be activating and using their artifices when they “cast a spell”. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[+]What Characters Are You Excited to Build?
Top