Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What DM flaw has caused you to actually leave a game?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Captain Panda" data-source="post: 7508818" data-attributes="member: 6861845"><p>No, it's not. Obviously the DM at a table can rule that it is, and he can DM for an empty table, but that is not an argument that would find much traction in the overall popular culture of D&D. Fluff text is just that, fluff. It provides an example of what a typical example of someone who is part of the class would be like. The idea that a high priest can demand your cleric to obey... I'm honestly not even sure if you're serious. If you are, two responses:</p><p></p><p>1. Sure. The high priest can demand service from your cleric because the fluff says so. It doesn't say the cleric has to obey or that ignoring this fluff will have any mechanical impact. Hell, anyone can demand service from the cleric, and he can subsequently ignore them. </p><p>2. The fluff descriptions are not instructions on how to play or rules, they are flavor. You suggesting that the outline of what would typically be true of an archetype, such as warlocks <strong>having</strong> to provide periodic services to their patron, is as ironclad a rule is just silly. It's also immediately contradicted by the fact that it also states, as flavor, that if your patron is a Great Old One they might not even know you're there. </p><p></p><p>Fluff is fluff, it's not rules. Suggesting there is a parity between changing the effect of spells and the damage dice of weapons and tweaking class flavor a bit is just.. it's ridiculous, and it's very much against the spirit of Fifth Edition.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Captain Panda, post: 7508818, member: 6861845"] No, it's not. Obviously the DM at a table can rule that it is, and he can DM for an empty table, but that is not an argument that would find much traction in the overall popular culture of D&D. Fluff text is just that, fluff. It provides an example of what a typical example of someone who is part of the class would be like. The idea that a high priest can demand your cleric to obey... I'm honestly not even sure if you're serious. If you are, two responses: 1. Sure. The high priest can demand service from your cleric because the fluff says so. It doesn't say the cleric has to obey or that ignoring this fluff will have any mechanical impact. Hell, anyone can demand service from the cleric, and he can subsequently ignore them. 2. The fluff descriptions are not instructions on how to play or rules, they are flavor. You suggesting that the outline of what would typically be true of an archetype, such as warlocks [B]having[/B] to provide periodic services to their patron, is as ironclad a rule is just silly. It's also immediately contradicted by the fact that it also states, as flavor, that if your patron is a Great Old One they might not even know you're there. Fluff is fluff, it's not rules. Suggesting there is a parity between changing the effect of spells and the damage dice of weapons and tweaking class flavor a bit is just.. it's ridiculous, and it's very much against the spirit of Fifth Edition. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What DM flaw has caused you to actually leave a game?
Top