Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What makes a Campaign setting Interesting to You?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quickleaf" data-source="post: 2952164" data-attributes="member: 20323"><p>John,</p><p></p><p>I'm curious are you writing your setting with your own players in mind? In that case what they find interesting is most important. I wonder what kind of players they are and where you fit on this spectrum (e.g. action hero, method-actor, explorer, favorite character, power gamer, storyteller, tactician). Don't be afraid to create your own core story, if your players would like it and it suits your setting. See Mike Mearls article on "Core Stories": <a href="http://mearls.livejournal.com/97347.html" target="_blank">http://mearls.livejournal.com/97347.html</a> </p><p></p><p>Personally, I find the following elements of a setting & its design interesting:</p><p></p><p><strong>Takes the players (and their characters) into account:</strong> Only an RPG provides an interactive setting, and only a homebrew campaign can be tailored to your players.</p><p>If your players are all graduate students in Medieval European history, avid SCA members, can quote Thomas of Aquinas, and love exploring settings, then you'd better do your research, and better yet include them in the world design (if they wish)!</p><p>If your players love bartering, then include a robust system of exchange (you might create an entire rules system just for bartering based on Spycraft's conflict resolution cards, perhaps with various witticisms, e.g. "but my wife and children will starve"). </p><p>If one player wants to be deeply involved in church politics/theological debates and another wants to explore the low-life world of thieves, then create a tie between the church and the thieves' guild.</p><p></p><p><strong>Read, read, read:</strong> Since its sounds like you're using Medieval Europe as your model, definitely research the era. At least this way if you choose to deviate from the historical model, you will be aware of what you're doing and have the opportunity to ask yourself: Why is Ilshara different in this regard? </p><p></p><p><strong>Big beautiful maps:</strong> I love maps, what can I say. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I have a feeling your poster maps of Ilshara are going to be a hit with your players!</p><p></p><p><strong>Room to make mistakes:</strong> Don't overwhelm yourself with details, because if your players are anything like mine, they'll know when you're being inconsistent. Keep your information manageable and stick to what you know best. Provide yourself with room to improvise and the players won't be able to tell a "mistake" from a "awesome GM foresight." <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p><strong>Write the setting without rules:</strong> I want to feel as if the setting were written independent of the rules, or better yet that the rules were written to serve the setting (in other words, the exact opposite of Eberron's approach, which was "Ok, we have a continual light spell, so...every city has permanent magical lanterns"). This first-draft should be understandable to non-gamers. Once you've finished, then go through and do the rules.</p><p></p><p><strong>Setting Core:</strong> Create a one-page (or less) "Setting Core" for your setting, and whenever you're stuck in your writing come back to this core. This keeps the setting tighter, less scattered. As a player I want to feel like there's a cohesive idea that's binding this world together.</p><p></p><p><strong>Avoid appropriating D&D "isms" & stock fantasy:</strong> I'm not excited when I hear "...ah! But my orcs have a Roman-esque empire and are Lawful Neutral." My ears hear this as: <em>An old idea, not necessarily appropriate to this setting, has been appropriated and given a new guise.</em> I don't believe creativity is the art of hiding the source. Sure, most of us (myself included) are guilty of doing this, but that doesn't mean we should *strive* to emulate others' works. (see "Nyambe" by Atlas Games & "Hamunaptra" by Green Ronin for excellent examples of appropriating D&D races into a new culture). Nothing wrong with this, just I'm more interested in what's fresh and unique to your world.</p><p></p><p><strong>Power to change the world:</strong> If the PCs are going to be traversing your world, then they need to have the power to change it, even dramatically altering the world you envisioned. Otherwise it will remain in the background. Personally, I enjoy it when after taking a setting-shaking action the GM raises the bar the next adventure, such as taking that event to its logical conclusion. "You did <em>what</em>??" "Ok then, this is what happens..."</p><p></p><p>Aaron Infante-Levy</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quickleaf, post: 2952164, member: 20323"] John, I'm curious are you writing your setting with your own players in mind? In that case what they find interesting is most important. I wonder what kind of players they are and where you fit on this spectrum (e.g. action hero, method-actor, explorer, favorite character, power gamer, storyteller, tactician). Don't be afraid to create your own core story, if your players would like it and it suits your setting. See Mike Mearls article on "Core Stories": [URL=http://mearls.livejournal.com/97347.html]http://mearls.livejournal.com/97347.html[/URL] Personally, I find the following elements of a setting & its design interesting: [b]Takes the players (and their characters) into account:[/b] Only an RPG provides an interactive setting, and only a homebrew campaign can be tailored to your players. If your players are all graduate students in Medieval European history, avid SCA members, can quote Thomas of Aquinas, and love exploring settings, then you'd better do your research, and better yet include them in the world design (if they wish)! If your players love bartering, then include a robust system of exchange (you might create an entire rules system just for bartering based on Spycraft's conflict resolution cards, perhaps with various witticisms, e.g. "but my wife and children will starve"). If one player wants to be deeply involved in church politics/theological debates and another wants to explore the low-life world of thieves, then create a tie between the church and the thieves' guild. [b]Read, read, read:[/b] Since its sounds like you're using Medieval Europe as your model, definitely research the era. At least this way if you choose to deviate from the historical model, you will be aware of what you're doing and have the opportunity to ask yourself: Why is Ilshara different in this regard? [b]Big beautiful maps:[/b] I love maps, what can I say. :) I have a feeling your poster maps of Ilshara are going to be a hit with your players! [b]Room to make mistakes:[/b] Don't overwhelm yourself with details, because if your players are anything like mine, they'll know when you're being inconsistent. Keep your information manageable and stick to what you know best. Provide yourself with room to improvise and the players won't be able to tell a "mistake" from a "awesome GM foresight." ;) [b]Write the setting without rules:[/b] I want to feel as if the setting were written independent of the rules, or better yet that the rules were written to serve the setting (in other words, the exact opposite of Eberron's approach, which was "Ok, we have a continual light spell, so...every city has permanent magical lanterns"). This first-draft should be understandable to non-gamers. Once you've finished, then go through and do the rules. [b]Setting Core:[/b] Create a one-page (or less) "Setting Core" for your setting, and whenever you're stuck in your writing come back to this core. This keeps the setting tighter, less scattered. As a player I want to feel like there's a cohesive idea that's binding this world together. [b]Avoid appropriating D&D "isms" & stock fantasy:[/b] I'm not excited when I hear "...ah! But my orcs have a Roman-esque empire and are Lawful Neutral." My ears hear this as: [i]An old idea, not necessarily appropriate to this setting, has been appropriated and given a new guise.[/i] I don't believe creativity is the art of hiding the source. Sure, most of us (myself included) are guilty of doing this, but that doesn't mean we should *strive* to emulate others' works. (see "Nyambe" by Atlas Games & "Hamunaptra" by Green Ronin for excellent examples of appropriating D&D races into a new culture). Nothing wrong with this, just I'm more interested in what's fresh and unique to your world. [b]Power to change the world:[/b] If the PCs are going to be traversing your world, then they need to have the power to change it, even dramatically altering the world you envisioned. Otherwise it will remain in the background. Personally, I enjoy it when after taking a setting-shaking action the GM raises the bar the next adventure, such as taking that event to its logical conclusion. "You did [i]what[/i]??" "Ok then, this is what happens..." Aaron Infante-Levy [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What makes a Campaign setting Interesting to You?
Top