Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What should Rogues do?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 6028038" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>Don't get me wrong. The rogue shouldn't be twiddling its thumbs. It can run in and stab and contribute just fine (yaay, bounded accuracy! yaaay, fast combat!).</p><p></p><p>But while the Fighter has a million and one ways to put a pointy object through the orc, the Rogue does not, really. They've got a few. A handful. Backstabs. Sneak attacks. A quick tumble. Whatever.</p><p></p><p>But where the rogue shines -- where it has all the options -- is when the combat is over, and there's a dark tunnel up ahead, and the party needs to know what lays down it, without going down it themselves. </p><p></p><p>Combat being "too central" may have been true in 4e, but it need not be true in 5e. In fact, if 5e comes out and it's all like "We HAD to design the rogue to be an awesome combatant because combat is TOO IMPORTANT for anyone to just be AVERAGE!", I know it won't work for me. Combat isn't that important for me. Combat shouldn't take up that much time, or be that much of a focus, or distort the game by that much, that you can't have a character who isn't some sort of awesome gut-stabbing ninja contribute a little bit and then get on with some other part of the game where they are awesome. Combat <strong>should not be that central</strong>. It wasn't for me before 4e, and it doesn't need to be in 5e, and if it IS, that's a PROBLEM. </p><p></p><p>If we return with open eyes to a more 3-pillar-style system, then we can also return to those early days of 1e dungeon crawls, where you sent the thief up ahead to scout, <em>because the thief was the best scout</em>. Because you don't WANT to get into the fight up ahead necessarily. Because there might be something up ahead you actually need to fear, that actually might be able to kill you, that might actually obliterate your entire party. A legit threat in the darkness ahead means you don't just want to tromp down the dungeon corridors behind the guy with the biggest shield. With a thief in your party, you can avoid combats, disarm traps, find the MacGuffin, and get out of the dungeon before anyone knows you're there. </p><p></p><p>Y'know the options that the Fighter has in combat in 5e? Parries, dodges, shield bashes, whatever. That's the quantity of options a Rogue should have when exploring. Stealth. Bluff. Disarm. Unlock. Climb. Even if you're not using the "skills module," the Rogue has these abilities. </p><p></p><p>If you want to play an awesome agile fighter, 5e should let you <em>play that as a Fighter</em>. If your character is defined by combat, 5e should point out in big bright lights that <em>you should play the class that is the best at combat</em>. You shouldn't need to make the rogue into a ginsu ninja. They should be awesome at AVOIDING fights, not necessarily awesome at kicking butt when they get in one. </p><p></p><p>Again, rogues should be able to contribute in combat. They don't need to be dead weights. They also don't need to be awesome Jackie Chan Bullet Time Kidney Slicers, though. They need to be awesome when exploring first and foremost.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 6028038, member: 2067"] Don't get me wrong. The rogue shouldn't be twiddling its thumbs. It can run in and stab and contribute just fine (yaay, bounded accuracy! yaaay, fast combat!). But while the Fighter has a million and one ways to put a pointy object through the orc, the Rogue does not, really. They've got a few. A handful. Backstabs. Sneak attacks. A quick tumble. Whatever. But where the rogue shines -- where it has all the options -- is when the combat is over, and there's a dark tunnel up ahead, and the party needs to know what lays down it, without going down it themselves. Combat being "too central" may have been true in 4e, but it need not be true in 5e. In fact, if 5e comes out and it's all like "We HAD to design the rogue to be an awesome combatant because combat is TOO IMPORTANT for anyone to just be AVERAGE!", I know it won't work for me. Combat isn't that important for me. Combat shouldn't take up that much time, or be that much of a focus, or distort the game by that much, that you can't have a character who isn't some sort of awesome gut-stabbing ninja contribute a little bit and then get on with some other part of the game where they are awesome. Combat [B]should not be that central[/B]. It wasn't for me before 4e, and it doesn't need to be in 5e, and if it IS, that's a PROBLEM. If we return with open eyes to a more 3-pillar-style system, then we can also return to those early days of 1e dungeon crawls, where you sent the thief up ahead to scout, [I]because the thief was the best scout[/I]. Because you don't WANT to get into the fight up ahead necessarily. Because there might be something up ahead you actually need to fear, that actually might be able to kill you, that might actually obliterate your entire party. A legit threat in the darkness ahead means you don't just want to tromp down the dungeon corridors behind the guy with the biggest shield. With a thief in your party, you can avoid combats, disarm traps, find the MacGuffin, and get out of the dungeon before anyone knows you're there. Y'know the options that the Fighter has in combat in 5e? Parries, dodges, shield bashes, whatever. That's the quantity of options a Rogue should have when exploring. Stealth. Bluff. Disarm. Unlock. Climb. Even if you're not using the "skills module," the Rogue has these abilities. If you want to play an awesome agile fighter, 5e should let you [I]play that as a Fighter[/I]. If your character is defined by combat, 5e should point out in big bright lights that [I]you should play the class that is the best at combat[/I]. You shouldn't need to make the rogue into a ginsu ninja. They should be awesome at AVOIDING fights, not necessarily awesome at kicking butt when they get in one. Again, rogues should be able to contribute in combat. They don't need to be dead weights. They also don't need to be awesome Jackie Chan Bullet Time Kidney Slicers, though. They need to be awesome when exploring first and foremost. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What should Rogues do?
Top