Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
With Respect to the Door and Expectations....The REAL Reason 5e Can't Unite the Base
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 5976876" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>Are we talking about D&D or 4e here. Because 4e is literally the only edition of D&D on my shelves (I can't talk about BECMI or oD&D) that provides me with significant support for solutions other than either violence or magic. It does this in several ways.</p><p></p><p>1: 4e has a genuine non-combat scene and plan resolution mechanic in the core rules (Skill Challenges). So it supports non-combat play in a way no other edition does. OK, so they had to errata the thing because some idiot couldn't do probability in the original version.</p><p></p><p>2: 4e characters are generally broadly competent. This is a specific flaw of 3.X however - and AD&D (particularly 1e) characters are also broadly competent as they don't have things they can't do defined by a skill system.</p><p></p><p>3: We don't have magic as The Solution to most problems - or emergent gamechanging strategies like scry-and-fry. We don't have much in the way of intrigue-wrecking abilities like Detect Thoughts in 4e. And the out of combat gamechanging magic has an actual cost rather than merely uses up a spell slot which a mid level caster has plenty of and everyone refreshes.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Except where it did. Like skill challenges. It provided actual mechanical support in the form of scene and plan framing and resolving mechanics, and abilities that were useful without being "I win" buttons. The 3.X rogue would give his right arm to be as competent outside combat as the 4e rogue - not only are they more skilled in general, they also have utility powers which can give them a level of focus and additional ability the 3.X rogue can never touch (that said, at level 10, the 3.X rogue can take skill mastery and avoid low rolls). Hell, it's entirely possible to design a 4e (human) fighter with enough skills at first level to make a 3.X rogue jealous. And the rogues don't find their abilities getting trumped by the wizard in the same way.</p><p></p><p>(For the design: human fighter, background to add perception as class skill, and the Twilight Adept and Sneak of Shadows feats - gives you training in Stealth, Thievery, Perception, Athletics, Intimidate, and Streetwise. In 3.X terms that's Hide, Move Silently, Disable Device, Sleight of Hand, Open Lock, Spot, Listen, Search, Climb, Jump, Swim, Intimidate, Gather Information, Knowledge (Local)).</p><p></p><p>So yeah, tell me how 4e doesn't support an intrigue or stealth game - when it does it for skill based characters better than any other edition of D&D there has ever been both from the DM's side (skill challenges) and from the skill based PC's side (only Rogues getting such skills pre-3e). If 4e weren't this flexible it wouldn't be my D&D of choice.</p><p></p><p>Now, there are two things 4e doesn't support - grit and overwhelming PC magic. Your characters <em>will</em> be larger than life. And it's hard work to make a mage tricksy enough that you retire him to prevent the DM tearing his hair out (I've done it in 4th but tend to stay away from wizards in previous editions).</p><p></p><p>So don't tell me stealth can't be done with 4th when I have run an entire stealth and asymmetric warfare based arc for my party and been supported in it by the rules in a way no other edition of D&D would come close to. No skill challenges, stealth skills locked up tighter, a no-caster party. And don't tell me that intrigue can't be done in 4th when I've done that too - and would again say that 4e is better suited to intrigue than any other edition of D&D I've either run or played.</p><p></p><p>And on a sidenote, 4e isn't actually good for dungeon crawls - combat moves too slowly. It's superb for large, meaningful battles - and can do the single-monster-gank as well as anything. But for orc guarding pie fights, don't bother. It just slows the pace to a crawl. That they tried to present dungeoncrawls in the initial modules (such as Keep on the Shadowfell) was a huge mistake (Keep was in general).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If 5e were presenting just about anything I couldn't do in 4e except the ability to eliminate dozens of kobolds with a single spell several times per day for the wizard there might be a point. But the key to any game is in the execution.</p><p></p><p>That said, there's still time to improve. 4e wasn't perfect out of the box - and it even took three years before there was a decent illusionist. I just don't see what playstyles it facilitates better than 4e. The hit points in the playtest made D&D Next PCs relatively tougher than 4e PCs - which means you aren't getting away from heroic fantasy in the slightest.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That kind of terminology was the literal title of one of the linked posts in the comment I was replying to.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That ... makes a little sense. Thank you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 5976876, member: 87792"] Are we talking about D&D or 4e here. Because 4e is literally the only edition of D&D on my shelves (I can't talk about BECMI or oD&D) that provides me with significant support for solutions other than either violence or magic. It does this in several ways. 1: 4e has a genuine non-combat scene and plan resolution mechanic in the core rules (Skill Challenges). So it supports non-combat play in a way no other edition does. OK, so they had to errata the thing because some idiot couldn't do probability in the original version. 2: 4e characters are generally broadly competent. This is a specific flaw of 3.X however - and AD&D (particularly 1e) characters are also broadly competent as they don't have things they can't do defined by a skill system. 3: We don't have magic as The Solution to most problems - or emergent gamechanging strategies like scry-and-fry. We don't have much in the way of intrigue-wrecking abilities like Detect Thoughts in 4e. And the out of combat gamechanging magic has an actual cost rather than merely uses up a spell slot which a mid level caster has plenty of and everyone refreshes. Except where it did. Like skill challenges. It provided actual mechanical support in the form of scene and plan framing and resolving mechanics, and abilities that were useful without being "I win" buttons. The 3.X rogue would give his right arm to be as competent outside combat as the 4e rogue - not only are they more skilled in general, they also have utility powers which can give them a level of focus and additional ability the 3.X rogue can never touch (that said, at level 10, the 3.X rogue can take skill mastery and avoid low rolls). Hell, it's entirely possible to design a 4e (human) fighter with enough skills at first level to make a 3.X rogue jealous. And the rogues don't find their abilities getting trumped by the wizard in the same way. (For the design: human fighter, background to add perception as class skill, and the Twilight Adept and Sneak of Shadows feats - gives you training in Stealth, Thievery, Perception, Athletics, Intimidate, and Streetwise. In 3.X terms that's Hide, Move Silently, Disable Device, Sleight of Hand, Open Lock, Spot, Listen, Search, Climb, Jump, Swim, Intimidate, Gather Information, Knowledge (Local)). So yeah, tell me how 4e doesn't support an intrigue or stealth game - when it does it for skill based characters better than any other edition of D&D there has ever been both from the DM's side (skill challenges) and from the skill based PC's side (only Rogues getting such skills pre-3e). If 4e weren't this flexible it wouldn't be my D&D of choice. Now, there are two things 4e doesn't support - grit and overwhelming PC magic. Your characters [I]will[/I] be larger than life. And it's hard work to make a mage tricksy enough that you retire him to prevent the DM tearing his hair out (I've done it in 4th but tend to stay away from wizards in previous editions). So don't tell me stealth can't be done with 4th when I have run an entire stealth and asymmetric warfare based arc for my party and been supported in it by the rules in a way no other edition of D&D would come close to. No skill challenges, stealth skills locked up tighter, a no-caster party. And don't tell me that intrigue can't be done in 4th when I've done that too - and would again say that 4e is better suited to intrigue than any other edition of D&D I've either run or played. And on a sidenote, 4e isn't actually good for dungeon crawls - combat moves too slowly. It's superb for large, meaningful battles - and can do the single-monster-gank as well as anything. But for orc guarding pie fights, don't bother. It just slows the pace to a crawl. That they tried to present dungeoncrawls in the initial modules (such as Keep on the Shadowfell) was a huge mistake (Keep was in general). If 5e were presenting just about anything I couldn't do in 4e except the ability to eliminate dozens of kobolds with a single spell several times per day for the wizard there might be a point. But the key to any game is in the execution. That said, there's still time to improve. 4e wasn't perfect out of the box - and it even took three years before there was a decent illusionist. I just don't see what playstyles it facilitates better than 4e. The hit points in the playtest made D&D Next PCs relatively tougher than 4e PCs - which means you aren't getting away from heroic fantasy in the slightest. That kind of terminology was the literal title of one of the linked posts in the comment I was replying to. That ... makes a little sense. Thank you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
With Respect to the Door and Expectations....The REAL Reason 5e Can't Unite the Base
Top