Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wizard Energy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7152632" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>Nod. Gygax was looking for a model of magic that'd work in his new fantasy wargame, that would allow magic-users to participate in combat rather than the more traditional visions of magic (that, in today's D&D would be ritual casting) and he came up with the 'magic' Jack Vance used in his science-fiction classic, The Dying Earth: relatively short spoken spells that were 'memorized' and 'forgotten' when cast. That was a choice of concept to model based on the qualities the mechanics that modeled it would have being theoretically good for what he wanted. Like the Dying Earth, D&D magic-users started memorizing very few spells at a time, but as levels got higher, they went off the rails.</p><p></p><p>'Memorization' drew a lot of flak over the years so the same mechanics were re-imagined as less-preposterous-seeming 'preparation,' from that point on, it seems, mechanics have driven fiction. </p><p></p><p>But, that does leave it open to DMs choosing various fictions based on those mechanics...</p><p></p><p> OK, I'll think of it that way: In that analogy, a 5e prepared (known) spell could be the circuit, and the slots would be capacitors, that for whatever reason, only come in certain arrays...</p><p>...yeah, that kinda works. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p> Traditional Vancian is conceptually simpler, and the bookkeeping also seems as simple or simpler: you have one list of prepared spells, as you cast them, you cross them off, vs a list of prepared spells, and a separate pool of slots that you check off. Neither is particularly intuitive to the new player, I wouldn't think (it certainly wasn't back in the day). </p><p></p><p>Vanican, however is much less flexible and harder to use optimally in play. More challenging, in spite of being less complicated. Neo-Vancian is easier/more-forgiving and delivers a more powerful magic-user, as it makes it easier to bring the optimal spell to bear in each situation - it's less challenging, even though somewhat more complicated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7152632, member: 996"] Nod. Gygax was looking for a model of magic that'd work in his new fantasy wargame, that would allow magic-users to participate in combat rather than the more traditional visions of magic (that, in today's D&D would be ritual casting) and he came up with the 'magic' Jack Vance used in his science-fiction classic, The Dying Earth: relatively short spoken spells that were 'memorized' and 'forgotten' when cast. That was a choice of concept to model based on the qualities the mechanics that modeled it would have being theoretically good for what he wanted. Like the Dying Earth, D&D magic-users started memorizing very few spells at a time, but as levels got higher, they went off the rails. 'Memorization' drew a lot of flak over the years so the same mechanics were re-imagined as less-preposterous-seeming 'preparation,' from that point on, it seems, mechanics have driven fiction. But, that does leave it open to DMs choosing various fictions based on those mechanics... OK, I'll think of it that way: In that analogy, a 5e prepared (known) spell could be the circuit, and the slots would be capacitors, that for whatever reason, only come in certain arrays... ...yeah, that kinda works. ;) Traditional Vancian is conceptually simpler, and the bookkeeping also seems as simple or simpler: you have one list of prepared spells, as you cast them, you cross them off, vs a list of prepared spells, and a separate pool of slots that you check off. Neither is particularly intuitive to the new player, I wouldn't think (it certainly wasn't back in the day). Vanican, however is much less flexible and harder to use optimally in play. More challenging, in spite of being less complicated. Neo-Vancian is easier/more-forgiving and delivers a more powerful magic-user, as it makes it easier to bring the optimal spell to bear in each situation - it's less challenging, even though somewhat more complicated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wizard Energy
Top