Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wizards of the Coast Requests Injunction Against NuTSR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Abstruse" data-source="post: 8765738" data-attributes="member: 6669048"><p>The legal team for Wizards of the Coast filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against TSR LLC, Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum LLC, and Justin LaNasa on September 8, 2022 to prevent the publication of <em>Star Frontiers New Genesis</em>.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]260947[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>The motion seeks the court to issue an order preventing LaNasa or his companies from “publishing, distributing, or otherwise making available <em>Star Frontiers New Genesis</em> or any iteration of the game using the Marks”. Wizards of the Coast’s lawyers claim that the company would suffer irreparable harm to their reputation due to customer confusion and that Wizards of the Coast may become associated with the playtest document content containing "racism and transphobia".</p><p></p><p>Accompanying the motion were two declarations of support with further corroborating evidence. The first came from Elizabeth M. Schuh, Director of Publishing and Licensing for <em>Dungeons & Dragons </em>for Wizards of the Coast, supporting the claims of Wizards of the Coast’s investment in the TSR brand, tracing the history through the company’s acquisition in 1997 to the release of <em>Star Frontiers </em>products on OneBookShelf (parent company of DriveThruRPG and Dungeonmasters Guild) and through to <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/hasbro-acquires-d-d-beyond-for-146m.687469/" target="_blank">the purchase of D&D Beyond</a>.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]260948[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Schuh’s declaration continues, stating that from the original filing of the countersuit until the end of July 2022, “Wizards believed TSR LLC was not actually selling or distributing any games bearing the Marks” and that Wizards of the Coast is concerned about the problematic content contained in the playtest document.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]260949[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>The declaration concludes with Schuh stating Wizards of the Coast’s philosophy of “an inclusive culture for gaming, including for its Dungeons & Dragons products”, including copies of <a href="https://dnd.wizards.com/news/diversity-and-dnd" target="_blank">the June 2020 blog post</a> stating a change to the depiction of race in D&D, the <a href="https://dnd.wizards.com/sage-advice/creature-evolutions" target="_blank">October 2021 <em>Sage Advice </em>column by Jeremy Crawford</a> on stat block and race changes starting with <em>The Wild Beyond the Witchlight</em>, and the recent <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/wotc-apologises-for-spelljammer-race-descriptions.691242/" target="_blank">September 2 apology for the Hadozee race</a> in <em>Spelljammer: Adventures in Space</em>. <a href="https://studybreaks.com/tvfilm/dungeons-and-dragons/" target="_blank">A September 9 article from the website <em>Study Breaks</em></a> titled “The Dungeons & Dragons Community Is Committing to Diversity” is used to support the claim that “The gaming community, through press and player forums, has noted Wizards’ efforts”.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]260950[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>The second declaration is from Lauren Rainwater, a partner at the legal firm Davis Wright Tremaine LLP representing Wizards of the Coast in the suit. This declaration focuses on brand confusion with screenshots from the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum’s “Out of Stock” store page for <em>Star Frontiers New Genesis</em> along with posts from EN World and Reddit documenting users posting their confusion at news about the game’s offensive content.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]260951[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>The exhibits from Rainwater’s filing include documentation of the trademark registration made by LaNasa, further screenshots of TSR-branded products for sale in the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum webstore, social media advertisements for <em>Star Frontiers New Genesis,</em> <a href="https://techraptor.net/tabletop/news/tsrs-star-frontiers-new-genesis-playtest-contains-racist-content" target="_blank">a copy of a TechRaptor story from July 2022</a> titled “TSR’s Star Frontiers New Genesis Playtest Contains Racist Content”, and <a href="https://twitter.com/NoHateInGaming/status/1554221176603688960" target="_blank">screenshots of the Twitter thread by user @NoHateInGaming</a> documenting material from the leaked playtest document.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]260952[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>And to support the claims of offensive content contained in the <em>Star Frontiers New Genesis </em>playtest document, Exhibit E of Lakewater’s declaration is a copy of several pages from the playtest document obtained via subpoena from Don Semora of Wizard Tower Games. Multiple sections of the document are highlighted featuring the more obviously offensive statements, the majority of which were previously detailed in the above-linked thread by @NoHateInGaming.</p><p></p><p>If granted, the injunction will only prevent LaNasa, TSR LLC, and Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum from publishing <em>Star Frontiers New Genesis </em>or any other products using the “Star Frontiers” name, but it will not cover other “infringing activities” such as the use of the TSR trademark. The court precedent (one of thirty cited in the motion) <a href="https://casetext.com/case/price-v-city-of-stockton" target="_blank"><em>Price v. City of Stockton</em></a> requires that the injunction request have a narrow scope to prevent an injunction from sweeping too broadly when weighing the balance of hardships. As Wizards of the Coast is claiming the damage will be done to the company’s brand reputation due to the content in <em>Star Frontiers New Genesis</em>, the injunction is solely to prevent its release.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]260953[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>The motion is noted for consideration for September 30, 2022 (the date the court will consider the motion) with oral argument requested. And for those who need a refresher on this entire TSR business, <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/the-full-glorious-history-of-nutsr.684697/" target="_blank">Morrus assembled "The Full & Glorious History of NuTSR" with a timeline of events</a>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Abstruse, post: 8765738, member: 6669048"] The legal team for Wizards of the Coast filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against TSR LLC, Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum LLC, and Justin LaNasa on September 8, 2022 to prevent the publication of [I]Star Frontiers New Genesis[/I]. [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="injunction.png"]260947[/ATTACH][/CENTER] The motion seeks the court to issue an order preventing LaNasa or his companies from “publishing, distributing, or otherwise making available [I]Star Frontiers New Genesis[/I] or any iteration of the game using the Marks”. Wizards of the Coast’s lawyers claim that the company would suffer irreparable harm to their reputation due to customer confusion and that Wizards of the Coast may become associated with the playtest document content containing "racism and transphobia". Accompanying the motion were two declarations of support with further corroborating evidence. The first came from Elizabeth M. Schuh, Director of Publishing and Licensing for [I]Dungeons & Dragons [/I]for Wizards of the Coast, supporting the claims of Wizards of the Coast’s investment in the TSR brand, tracing the history through the company’s acquisition in 1997 to the release of [I]Star Frontiers [/I]products on OneBookShelf (parent company of DriveThruRPG and Dungeonmasters Guild) and through to [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/hasbro-acquires-d-d-beyond-for-146m.687469/']the purchase of D&D Beyond[/URL]. [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="Filing1.png"]260948[/ATTACH][/CENTER] Schuh’s declaration continues, stating that from the original filing of the countersuit until the end of July 2022, “Wizards believed TSR LLC was not actually selling or distributing any games bearing the Marks” and that Wizards of the Coast is concerned about the problematic content contained in the playtest document. [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="Filing2.png"]260949[/ATTACH][/CENTER] The declaration concludes with Schuh stating Wizards of the Coast’s philosophy of “an inclusive culture for gaming, including for its Dungeons & Dragons products”, including copies of [URL='https://dnd.wizards.com/news/diversity-and-dnd']the June 2020 blog post[/URL] stating a change to the depiction of race in D&D, the [URL='https://dnd.wizards.com/sage-advice/creature-evolutions']October 2021 [I]Sage Advice [/I]column by Jeremy Crawford[/URL] on stat block and race changes starting with [I]The Wild Beyond the Witchlight[/I], and the recent [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/wotc-apologises-for-spelljammer-race-descriptions.691242/']September 2 apology for the Hadozee race[/URL] in [I]Spelljammer: Adventures in Space[/I]. [URL='https://studybreaks.com/tvfilm/dungeons-and-dragons/']A September 9 article from the website [I]Study Breaks[/I][/URL] titled “The Dungeons & Dragons Community Is Committing to Diversity” is used to support the claim that “The gaming community, through press and player forums, has noted Wizards’ efforts”. [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="filing3.png"]260950[/ATTACH][/CENTER] The second declaration is from Lauren Rainwater, a partner at the legal firm Davis Wright Tremaine LLP representing Wizards of the Coast in the suit. This declaration focuses on brand confusion with screenshots from the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum’s “Out of Stock” store page for [I]Star Frontiers New Genesis[/I] along with posts from EN World and Reddit documenting users posting their confusion at news about the game’s offensive content. [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="filing4.png"]260951[/ATTACH][/CENTER] The exhibits from Rainwater’s filing include documentation of the trademark registration made by LaNasa, further screenshots of TSR-branded products for sale in the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum webstore, social media advertisements for [I]Star Frontiers New Genesis,[/I] [URL='https://techraptor.net/tabletop/news/tsrs-star-frontiers-new-genesis-playtest-contains-racist-content']a copy of a TechRaptor story from July 2022[/URL] titled “TSR’s Star Frontiers New Genesis Playtest Contains Racist Content”, and [URL='https://twitter.com/NoHateInGaming/status/1554221176603688960']screenshots of the Twitter thread by user @NoHateInGaming[/URL] documenting material from the leaked playtest document. [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="filing5.png"]260952[/ATTACH][/CENTER] And to support the claims of offensive content contained in the [I]Star Frontiers New Genesis [/I]playtest document, Exhibit E of Lakewater’s declaration is a copy of several pages from the playtest document obtained via subpoena from Don Semora of Wizard Tower Games. Multiple sections of the document are highlighted featuring the more obviously offensive statements, the majority of which were previously detailed in the above-linked thread by @NoHateInGaming. If granted, the injunction will only prevent LaNasa, TSR LLC, and Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum from publishing [I]Star Frontiers New Genesis [/I]or any other products using the “Star Frontiers” name, but it will not cover other “infringing activities” such as the use of the TSR trademark. The court precedent (one of thirty cited in the motion) [URL='https://casetext.com/case/price-v-city-of-stockton'][I]Price v. City of Stockton[/I][/URL] requires that the injunction request have a narrow scope to prevent an injunction from sweeping too broadly when weighing the balance of hardships. As Wizards of the Coast is claiming the damage will be done to the company’s brand reputation due to the content in [I]Star Frontiers New Genesis[/I], the injunction is solely to prevent its release. [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="filing6.png"]260953[/ATTACH][/CENTER] The motion is noted for consideration for September 30, 2022 (the date the court will consider the motion) with oral argument requested. And for those who need a refresher on this entire TSR business, [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/the-full-glorious-history-of-nutsr.684697/']Morrus assembled "The Full & Glorious History of NuTSR" with a timeline of events[/URL]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wizards of the Coast Requests Injunction Against NuTSR
Top