Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worlds of Design: The Many Shades of RPG Play
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lewpuls" data-source="post: 7785431" data-attributes="member: 30518"><p>I’m a categorizer and always have been. Categorization leads to illumination, but the danger in categorizing is that every play style might seem to fit only the extremes of each category. In this article, I try to categorize the various RPG styles of play in a logical manner.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]</p><p></p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]112781[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center">Picture courtesy of <a href="https://pixabay.com/photos/soap-bubble-color-colorful-3490954/" target="_blank">Pixabay</a>.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p></p><p></p><p>RPGs offer more freedom to act than other forms of tabletop gaming. The players can “try anything” because they have a human GM (usually!). The constraints on the players are the constraints of physics and other “laws” of the real world (also usually!). Not surprisingly then, there are almost as many ways to play RPGs as there are players. But we can still identify categories of the attitudes of players and GMs, which is my goal below.</p><p></p><p>We’re in a world of extremism, so I must caution that these are the extremes with a very large area in between where most campaigns and players typically operate. Ideally I’d show you a line with one extreme at the left, the other extreme at the right, and lots of space between the two. I've added reference to my Worlds of Design column(s) that primarily discuss each category.</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><th><strong>One Extreme</strong></th><th><strong>Lots in Between</strong></th><th><strong>The Other Extreme</strong></th><th><strong>Worlds of Design Column</strong></th></tr><tr><td>Beat the Bad Guys</td><td><p style="text-align: center"><===></p> </td><td>Save the World</td><td><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4185-Let-s-Not-Save-The-World-Again" target="_blank">Let's Not Save the World . . . Again</a></td></tr><tr><td>Completing mission is paramount (military)</td><td><p style="text-align: center"><===></p> </td><td>Story is paramount</td><td>Mentioned in columns several times.</td></tr><tr><td>What’s best for the group is best</td><td><p style="text-align: center"><===></p> </td><td>All about Me - the individual predominates</td><td>"All About Me" FRPG <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?5652-Worlds-of-Design-%93All-About-Me%94-RPGs-(Part-1)" target="_blank">Part 1</a> and <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?654236-Worlds-of-Design-%93All-About-Me%94-RPGs-(Part-2)" target="_blank">Part 2</a></td></tr><tr><td>“There’s a war on”</td><td><p style="text-align: center"><===></p> </td><td>Non-violent means to an end</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>GM is “god”</td><td><p style="text-align: center"><===></p> </td><td>GM is only a rules arbiter</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Combat as war</td><td><p style="text-align: center"><===></p> </td><td>Combat as sport</td><td><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4580-RPG-Combat-Sport-or-War" target="_blank">RPG Combat: Sport or War?</a></td></tr><tr><td>“Hero” in absolutes/black and white</td><td><p style="text-align: center"><===></p> </td><td>“Hero” in shades of grey</td><td><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4981-Heroes-In-Shades-Of-Grey" target="_blank">Heroes in Shades of Grey</a></td></tr><tr><td>HERO</td><td><p style="text-align: center"><===></p> </td><td>VILLAIN</td><td><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4981-Heroes-In-Shades-Of-Grey" target="_blank">Heroes in Shades of Grey</a></td></tr><tr><td>Co-operative (within group)</td><td><p style="text-align: center"><===></p> </td><td>Competitive (within group)</td><td><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?5635-Worlds-of-Design-Tabletop-RPGs-Are-the-Most-Naturally-Co-operative-Games" target="_blank">Tabletop RPGs Are the Most Naturally Cooperative Games</a><br /> <p style="text-align: center"></p> </td></tr><tr><td>Real fear of character death/loss</td><td><p style="text-align: center">===</p> </td><td>No fear of death/loss (most computer RPGs)</td><td><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4132-Consequence-and-Reward-in-RPGs" target="_blank">Consequence and Reward</a>, <br /> <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4758-Tension-Threats-And-Progression-In-RPGs" target="_blank">Tension, Threats, and Progression in RPGs</a></td></tr></table><p></p><p>These spectra don’t stand isolated from one another. For example, if fear of death/loss is real, players are likely to be quite cooperative within their group; if there’s little or no fear, it’s easy for players to be competitive with one another.</p><p></p><p>Players respond to combat as war by trying to avoid combat, by using stratagems to defeat the enemy without combat (or more often with only one-sided combat). When the game is combat as sport, players won’t work to avoid combat. (This seems a slight paradox, insofar as the players who have a more military orientation may tend to avoid combat, whereas some with a less military orientation may be happy to be in combat.)</p><p></p><p>I always think of my games as Good versus Evil, that there's a <strong>war </strong>on. But other gamers, especially those who prefer real-world shades of grey to fantasy black-and-white, may prefer non-violent means of resolution, whether via bargaining or confidence games, deals or theft. The black-and-white makes for easier GMing, I think -- but then again I have a military orientation despite never having been in the military.</p><p></p><p>The original GM ideal was the "god" who created everything, whose word was law. This requires creativity and imagination (and reasonableness), and can be a lot of work. Later the idea of a GM who as rules arbiter who relies on published material became popular. I think that's because it's easier to do, and consequently more people can be found willing to GM. A big limitation on the popularity of tabletop RPGs is the availability of GMs.</p><p></p><p>I ask you, readers, what spectra I should have/might have included? Also, what other strong relationships between the categories do you see?</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #3E3E3E"><em>This article was contributed by Lewis Pulsipher (<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/list.php?author/30518-lewpuls" target="_blank">lewpuls</a>) as part of EN World's Columnist (ENWC) program. Lew was Contributing Editor to Dragon, White Dwarf, and Space Gamer magazines and contributed monsters to TSR's original Fiend Folio, including the Elemental Princes of Evil, denzelian, and poltergeist. You can follow Lew on his <a href="http://www.pulsiphergames.com/" target="_blank">web site</a> and his <a href="https://www.udemy.com/user/drlewispulsipher/" target="_blank">Udemy course landing page</a>. If you enjoy the daily news and articles from EN World, please consider <a href="https://www.patreon.com/enworld" target="_blank">contributing to our Patreon!</a></em></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lewpuls, post: 7785431, member: 30518"] I’m a categorizer and always have been. Categorization leads to illumination, but the danger in categorizing is that every play style might seem to fit only the extremes of each category. In this article, I try to categorize the various RPG styles of play in a logical manner.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK] [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="soap-bubble-3490954_960_720.jpg"]112781[/ATTACH] Picture courtesy of [URL='https://pixabay.com/photos/soap-bubble-color-colorful-3490954/']Pixabay[/URL].[/CENTER] [INDENT][/INDENT] RPGs offer more freedom to act than other forms of tabletop gaming. The players can “try anything” because they have a human GM (usually!). The constraints on the players are the constraints of physics and other “laws” of the real world (also usually!). Not surprisingly then, there are almost as many ways to play RPGs as there are players. But we can still identify categories of the attitudes of players and GMs, which is my goal below. We’re in a world of extremism, so I must caution that these are the extremes with a very large area in between where most campaigns and players typically operate. Ideally I’d show you a line with one extreme at the left, the other extreme at the right, and lots of space between the two. I've added reference to my Worlds of Design column(s) that primarily discuss each category. [TABLE] [TR] [TH][B]One Extreme[/B][/TH] [TH][B]Lots in Between[/B][/TH] [TH][B]The Other Extreme[/B][/TH] [TH][B]Worlds of Design Column[/B][/TH] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Beat the Bad Guys[/TD] [TD][CENTER]<===>[/CENTER][/TD] [TD]Save the World[/TD] [TD][URL='http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4185-Let-s-Not-Save-The-World-Again']Let's Not Save the World . . . Again[/URL][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Completing mission is paramount (military)[/TD] [TD][CENTER]<===>[/CENTER][/TD] [TD]Story is paramount[/TD] [TD]Mentioned in columns several times.[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]What’s best for the group is best[/TD] [TD][CENTER]<===>[/CENTER][/TD] [TD]All about Me - the individual predominates[/TD] [TD]"All About Me" FRPG [URL='http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?5652-Worlds-of-Design-%93All-About-Me%94-RPGs-(Part-1)']Part 1[/URL] and [URL='http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?654236-Worlds-of-Design-%93All-About-Me%94-RPGs-(Part-2)']Part 2[/URL][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]“There’s a war on”[/TD] [TD][CENTER]<===>[/CENTER][/TD] [TD]Non-violent means to an end[/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]GM is “god”[/TD] [TD][CENTER]<===>[/CENTER][/TD] [TD]GM is only a rules arbiter[/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Combat as war[/TD] [TD][CENTER]<===>[/CENTER][/TD] [TD]Combat as sport[/TD] [TD][URL='http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4580-RPG-Combat-Sport-or-War']RPG Combat: Sport or War?[/URL][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]“Hero” in absolutes/black and white[/TD] [TD][CENTER]<===>[/CENTER][/TD] [TD]“Hero” in shades of grey[/TD] [TD][URL='http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4981-Heroes-In-Shades-Of-Grey']Heroes in Shades of Grey[/URL][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]HERO[/TD] [TD][CENTER]<===>[/CENTER][/TD] [TD]VILLAIN[/TD] [TD][URL='http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4981-Heroes-In-Shades-Of-Grey']Heroes in Shades of Grey[/URL][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Co-operative (within group)[/TD] [TD][CENTER]<===>[/CENTER][/TD] [TD]Competitive (within group)[/TD] [TD][URL='http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?5635-Worlds-of-Design-Tabletop-RPGs-Are-the-Most-Naturally-Co-operative-Games']Tabletop RPGs Are the Most Naturally Cooperative Games[/URL] [CENTER][/CENTER][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Real fear of character death/loss[/TD] [TD][CENTER]===[/CENTER][/TD] [TD]No fear of death/loss (most computer RPGs)[/TD] [TD][URL='http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4132-Consequence-and-Reward-in-RPGs']Consequence and Reward[/URL], [URL='http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4758-Tension-Threats-And-Progression-In-RPGs']Tension, Threats, and Progression in RPGs[/URL][/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] These spectra don’t stand isolated from one another. For example, if fear of death/loss is real, players are likely to be quite cooperative within their group; if there’s little or no fear, it’s easy for players to be competitive with one another. Players respond to combat as war by trying to avoid combat, by using stratagems to defeat the enemy without combat (or more often with only one-sided combat). When the game is combat as sport, players won’t work to avoid combat. (This seems a slight paradox, insofar as the players who have a more military orientation may tend to avoid combat, whereas some with a less military orientation may be happy to be in combat.) I always think of my games as Good versus Evil, that there's a [B]war [/B]on. But other gamers, especially those who prefer real-world shades of grey to fantasy black-and-white, may prefer non-violent means of resolution, whether via bargaining or confidence games, deals or theft. The black-and-white makes for easier GMing, I think -- but then again I have a military orientation despite never having been in the military. The original GM ideal was the "god" who created everything, whose word was law. This requires creativity and imagination (and reasonableness), and can be a lot of work. Later the idea of a GM who as rules arbiter who relies on published material became popular. I think that's because it's easier to do, and consequently more people can be found willing to GM. A big limitation on the popularity of tabletop RPGs is the availability of GMs. I ask you, readers, what spectra I should have/might have included? Also, what other strong relationships between the categories do you see? [COLOR=#3E3E3E][I]This article was contributed by Lewis Pulsipher ([URL='http://www.enworld.org/forum/list.php?author/30518-lewpuls']lewpuls[/URL]) as part of EN World's Columnist (ENWC) program. Lew was Contributing Editor to Dragon, White Dwarf, and Space Gamer magazines and contributed monsters to TSR's original Fiend Folio, including the Elemental Princes of Evil, denzelian, and poltergeist. You can follow Lew on his [URL='http://www.pulsiphergames.com/']web site[/URL] and his [URL='https://www.udemy.com/user/drlewispulsipher/']Udemy course landing page[/URL]. If you enjoy the daily news and articles from EN World, please consider [URL='https://www.patreon.com/enworld']contributing to our Patreon![/URL][/I][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worlds of Design: The Many Shades of RPG Play
Top