Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would you allow this paladin in your game? (new fiction added 11/11/08)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fusangite" data-source="post: 1962469" data-attributes="member: 7240"><p>We're not advocating the idea of separate disassociated types of prostitution. We are arguing that there is a continuum of different types of prostitution.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, as it is the only kind of prostitution the paladin is interacting with, why wouldn't it be more relevant than the types with which the paladin is not interacting?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. But the "purpose" of sex is a socially constructed thing, at least for the purpose of running RPGs. Even if you want to argue that sex in this world has some absolute "purpose" that is transhistorical and transcultural, what is the point of running a fantasy RPG if the fantasy world has to conform to the transcultural, transhistorical truth you posit for this world? The fact is that how we think about sexuality does vary based on social conditions. Now, if you want to argue that your particular cultural approach to these issues is the absolute reference frame and all other cultures can be judged based on their proximity to this view, that's fine. It still does not alter the fact that different cultures really do think about sexuality differently. Look at the Inuit and Mongol definitions of hospitality, for instance. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. But in other cultures, these dire consequences are less common or there are different consequences because those cultures understand sex differently. </p><p></p><p>Look, I've gamed with people who feel that D&D is about modern people thinking modern thoughts living in modern cultures using medieval tech and magic. That's a fine way to play D&D -- it's just not a way I enjoy playing the game. And I don't think that's the playing style that most people contributing to this thread favour. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But we're not doing that. What we are saying is that prostitution runs along a continuum on which there are no sharp distinctions. Your reasoning here is essentially as follows: because there is no point in the spectrum where there are discreet breaks between colours, all colours are therefore yellow because yellow is the colour I see most frequently.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>OK -- this is just an insane logical leap on your part. Your argument is that because paladins are exemplary individuals, every single thing they do should be/is viewed as a blanket endorsement of all practices associated with it. So, for instance, if a paladin travels by boat somewhere, he is endorsing press gangs and galley slavery. If he eats a loaf of bread, he is endorsing serfdom and agricultural slavery. If he uses a metal weapon or dons metal armour, he is endorsing slavery. If he engages in combat, he is endorsing all unjust wars and genocides. Etc.</p><p></p><p>Your point here is just nonsense. While I have agreed with you on other threads, I really think you need to take a step back and ask yourself if you are making any sense here at all. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Let's just step into the modern world for a second: I believe that factory-farmed animals are raised under horrible conditions akin to torture; most vegetables are grown using pesticides that have adverse health impacts both on farm workers as well as on the people consuming them. Now, my paladin would buy organic vegetables and eat free range organic meat. Your paladin, faced with the same situation, would starve himself to death.</p><p></p><p>I agree that paladins should set examples. Paladins should oppose bad rules by endorsing good kings. They should oppose bad landlords by associating with those who treat their peasants well. Etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm watching you tangle yourself up here. I think you're seeing the problem of trying to create these transhistorical and transcultural values. Paladins live in the context of their culture; in Rome, a paladin wouldn't be indifferent to all forms of slavery; he would associate with people who treated their slaves well and who granted manumission fairly and generously. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What portion of Aragorn's army that marched from Minas Tirith to the Black Gate thought they would win? From my reading of the text, less than 20%. But there sense of hopelessness didn't make victory any more or less real. Fortunately, through most of history, this modern nonsense about creating one's own reality was not really part of people's thought. Whether you believe you will succeed is not actually the preponderant factor in determining success. </p><p></p><p>In the jurisdiction in which I used to live, there was one election in 1991 when something totally incredible happened and a bunch of people were elected to the legislature who did not believe that victory was possible. People who ran $300 campaigns were swept into office past incumbents who had spent over $100,000. Many of these candidates were not available to the media on election night because they believed victory to be so improbable/impossible that they were out doing other things. Many grudgingly quit their jobs, having made no plans to become full-time parliamentarians, etc. Belief in one's success is not a necessary condition of success.</p><p></p><p>While I agree with you that deportment is a necessary part of paladinhood and that Cedric does not rise to the standard I would set, I'm not sure that hope is a necessary part of said deportment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fusangite, post: 1962469, member: 7240"] We're not advocating the idea of separate disassociated types of prostitution. We are arguing that there is a continuum of different types of prostitution. Well, as it is the only kind of prostitution the paladin is interacting with, why wouldn't it be more relevant than the types with which the paladin is not interacting? Yes. But the "purpose" of sex is a socially constructed thing, at least for the purpose of running RPGs. Even if you want to argue that sex in this world has some absolute "purpose" that is transhistorical and transcultural, what is the point of running a fantasy RPG if the fantasy world has to conform to the transcultural, transhistorical truth you posit for this world? The fact is that how we think about sexuality does vary based on social conditions. Now, if you want to argue that your particular cultural approach to these issues is the absolute reference frame and all other cultures can be judged based on their proximity to this view, that's fine. It still does not alter the fact that different cultures really do think about sexuality differently. Look at the Inuit and Mongol definitions of hospitality, for instance. Yes. But in other cultures, these dire consequences are less common or there are different consequences because those cultures understand sex differently. Look, I've gamed with people who feel that D&D is about modern people thinking modern thoughts living in modern cultures using medieval tech and magic. That's a fine way to play D&D -- it's just not a way I enjoy playing the game. And I don't think that's the playing style that most people contributing to this thread favour. But we're not doing that. What we are saying is that prostitution runs along a continuum on which there are no sharp distinctions. Your reasoning here is essentially as follows: because there is no point in the spectrum where there are discreet breaks between colours, all colours are therefore yellow because yellow is the colour I see most frequently. OK -- this is just an insane logical leap on your part. Your argument is that because paladins are exemplary individuals, every single thing they do should be/is viewed as a blanket endorsement of all practices associated with it. So, for instance, if a paladin travels by boat somewhere, he is endorsing press gangs and galley slavery. If he eats a loaf of bread, he is endorsing serfdom and agricultural slavery. If he uses a metal weapon or dons metal armour, he is endorsing slavery. If he engages in combat, he is endorsing all unjust wars and genocides. Etc. Your point here is just nonsense. While I have agreed with you on other threads, I really think you need to take a step back and ask yourself if you are making any sense here at all. Let's just step into the modern world for a second: I believe that factory-farmed animals are raised under horrible conditions akin to torture; most vegetables are grown using pesticides that have adverse health impacts both on farm workers as well as on the people consuming them. Now, my paladin would buy organic vegetables and eat free range organic meat. Your paladin, faced with the same situation, would starve himself to death. I agree that paladins should set examples. Paladins should oppose bad rules by endorsing good kings. They should oppose bad landlords by associating with those who treat their peasants well. Etc. I'm watching you tangle yourself up here. I think you're seeing the problem of trying to create these transhistorical and transcultural values. Paladins live in the context of their culture; in Rome, a paladin wouldn't be indifferent to all forms of slavery; he would associate with people who treated their slaves well and who granted manumission fairly and generously. What portion of Aragorn's army that marched from Minas Tirith to the Black Gate thought they would win? From my reading of the text, less than 20%. But there sense of hopelessness didn't make victory any more or less real. Fortunately, through most of history, this modern nonsense about creating one's own reality was not really part of people's thought. Whether you believe you will succeed is not actually the preponderant factor in determining success. In the jurisdiction in which I used to live, there was one election in 1991 when something totally incredible happened and a bunch of people were elected to the legislature who did not believe that victory was possible. People who ran $300 campaigns were swept into office past incumbents who had spent over $100,000. Many of these candidates were not available to the media on election night because they believed victory to be so improbable/impossible that they were out doing other things. Many grudgingly quit their jobs, having made no plans to become full-time parliamentarians, etc. Belief in one's success is not a necessary condition of success. While I agree with you that deportment is a necessary part of paladinhood and that Cedric does not rise to the standard I would set, I'm not sure that hope is a necessary part of said deportment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would you allow this paladin in your game? (new fiction added 11/11/08)
Top