Atlatl Jones
Explorer
A recent article by James Wyatt said that a swordsage is not a concept that is easily doable in the core 4e rules. There have also been some strong hints that the monk will not be in the 4e PHB either.
What I'm hoping is that the monk will kill the swordsage and take his stuff. IMO the separation between the two classes is artificial, since they're both essentially mystic unarmored wuxia classes. The monk, with its exclusive focus on unarmed combat, punching dragons to death, may have fit when it was created in the ninja and kung fu heyday of the 80's, but today wuxia and martial arts genre films use swordfighting just as much as unarmed combat.
I'm glad that it's not in the PHB, since the concept doesn't suit all D&D worlds, but I hope that it appears in a later PH, or an asian-themed sourcebook. I also hope that the name "monk" is ditched, in favor of a name that doesn't imply cheesy fortune cookie monasticism.
What I'm hoping is that the monk will kill the swordsage and take his stuff. IMO the separation between the two classes is artificial, since they're both essentially mystic unarmored wuxia classes. The monk, with its exclusive focus on unarmed combat, punching dragons to death, may have fit when it was created in the ninja and kung fu heyday of the 80's, but today wuxia and martial arts genre films use swordfighting just as much as unarmed combat.
I'm glad that it's not in the PHB, since the concept doesn't suit all D&D worlds, but I hope that it appears in a later PH, or an asian-themed sourcebook. I also hope that the name "monk" is ditched, in favor of a name that doesn't imply cheesy fortune cookie monasticism.
Last edited: