DalkonCledwin
First Post
It has come to my attention that apparently it is not just against the rules for players to not engage in Player vs. Player Combat, but it is now apparently unacceptable for said players to get into arguments with each other in a manner that would be considered "unprofessional" by potential employers, even if said arguments reflect a significant difference in philosophy, religion, or other factors between the characters involved.
Thus it is my belief that in order to allow such disagreements a healthy means of being resolved in game that does not rely upon role playing out hefty in character arguments that can ultimately lead to the bogging down of the games storyline, that we should put serious consideration into the possibility of whether or not a Non-Lethal Combat Arena where players can duke out their disagreements can be performed within the confines of the Living Pathfinder Worldsetting.
I would like to further suggest that this system be solely for the purpose of facilitating the resolution of heated conflicts and thus that it not award any sort of rewards for the characters involved other than potential role-playing related rewards that have no mechanical benefit to the characters.
Thus it is my belief that in order to allow such disagreements a healthy means of being resolved in game that does not rely upon role playing out hefty in character arguments that can ultimately lead to the bogging down of the games storyline, that we should put serious consideration into the possibility of whether or not a Non-Lethal Combat Arena where players can duke out their disagreements can be performed within the confines of the Living Pathfinder Worldsetting.
I would like to further suggest that this system be solely for the purpose of facilitating the resolution of heated conflicts and thus that it not award any sort of rewards for the characters involved other than potential role-playing related rewards that have no mechanical benefit to the characters.