• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D 5E WOTC Possibly Removing "Druids" for Religious/Cultural Sensitivity Reasons


log in or register to remove this ad

Reynard

Legend
Supporter
According to UK historian Ben Johnson:

"Druidism can be described as a shamanic religion, as it relied on a combination of contact with the spirit world and holistic medicines to treat (and sometimes cause) illnesses."

Edit
apparently a view held by others as well, considering druids more shamanistic than priestly

Anne Ross, author of Pagan Celtic Britain (1967) and The Life and Death of a Druid Prince (1989),
Miranda Aldhouse-Green, author of The Gods of the Celts (1986), Exploring the World of the Druids (1997) and Caesar's Druids: Story of an Ancient Priesthood (2010);
Barry Cunliffe, author of Iron Age Communities in Britain (1991) and The Ancient Celts (1997)
huh. Interesting. I remembered it differently, but I'm not one to argue with experts.
 


nevin

Hero
According to UK historian Ben Johnson:

"Druidism can be described as a shamanic religion, as it relied on a combination of contact with the spirit world and holistic medicines to treat (and sometimes cause) illnesses."

Edit
apparently a view held by others as well, considering druids more shamanistic than priestly

Anne Ross, author of Pagan Celtic Britain (1967) and The Life and Death of a Druid Prince (1989),
Miranda Aldhouse-Green, author of The Gods of the Celts (1986), Exploring the World of the Druids (1997) and Caesar's Druids: Story of an Ancient Priesthood (2010);
Barry Cunliffe, author of Iron Age Communities in Britain (1991) and The Ancient Celts (1997)
careful defining druidism. There are very few written records of what druids did, mostly by the Romans as far as I know. There was a lot of "druidic" revivalism going on in 1800's and and 1900's and what most people consider to be the "Druidic" religion is a modern construct made by people who used the tiny amounts of historical documents to validate what they believed, and in many cases just outright fabricate with no support thier beliefs.

To begin with each of the Celtic regional groups had druids they all worshiped gods but not all the same gods. There are indications in those roman writings that the Druids weren't the uniform, religion that modern myths make them out to be. But regardless of what you believe there are very few and scant records that actually document any Druid beliefs or practices. go try and find some historical documents to back up those books you reference. You'll be horrified at how little evidence there is to back up any view on Druids.
 


Whizbang Dustyboots

Gnometown Hero
Druids weren't shamans. Shaman is a very specific thing, and off the top of my head I can't think of a European shamanic tradition (but i am not well versed in eastern Europe history and tradition, so i could be wrong). Druids were priests of the celtic gods.
Shamans were in extreme northern Europe and much of what was modern Russia. Both are European under many definitions.
 



According to UK historian Ben Johnson:

"Druidism can be described as a shamanic religion, as it relied on a combination of contact with the spirit world and holistic medicines to treat (and sometimes cause) illnesses."

But that's a pretty solid description of what priests do too, interceding with things beyond the normal world (whether ghosts or demons or other beings from beyond the world) and various prayers to cure/create sickness or various curses (not alwaays distinguishable from illnesses). I'd be inclined to argue that shaman and druid are just particular cultures ways of describing their equivalent to priests (and that we don't take a similar approach with cultures we think we're more familiar with).
 

Stormonu

Legend
I am glad I have my 1e and 5e books now more than ever.

Part of what makes D&D interesting are cultural references, history and language. If folks go all in on removing almost all cultural/historical references, no matter how tortured their path to current meaning, it will be a loss. How many of us learned to read and love history because of this game?

But no matter. I am going to play a guy with pointy tools that kills things. Or maybe a guy who reads from a magic book and zaps things. Not evocative but inoffensive so win-win?

I mean I would get it if druids were always evil and ineffectual…but what class is an accurate representation of anything but ideas in fiction?

And then we read it’s probably just hysteria and is not a real thing…back to shaking fist at the sky…
Nah, still not allowed. You're killing things, after all.
 

Voidrunner's Codex

Remove ads

Top