Recent content by CreamCloud0

but they shouldn't force you to become supernatural just because you reached a certain level threshold

why do you get to tell everyone else that's not possible though? and you might just say 'oh that's only my opinion of it, do what you want in your own games' but the fact you're perpetually insisting on all these things meeting the Micah Sweet standard of believability before we can discuss...

quick rundown of what i might put into a base warlord, not all at 1st obviously but the general core shape of their abilities. d10 hit die heavy armour+shields simple weapons, longsword, shortsword, scimitar, rapier. 3 skills, fighter skill list plus investigation, religion, medicine...

remind me again which subclasses are the ones that multiple classes can take and at levels beyond 1-3 in addition to the base class's subclass? they are not the same thing, give us actual prestige classes in 5e.

this is why earlier i said that i think the martials need to be bumped up to the rogue's current skill capacity, spreading expertise more generously to the martials lets them break past the swingyness of the d20, BA is a good idea in theory but without expertise there's no significant mitigation...

My point being, although the structure of both powers and spells are quite similar on an individual level the structure of the entire system around them that they are used by, AEDU VS spell slots respectively, is significantly different, and that means ‘just give warlords spells’ has entirely...

Personally I dislike the multiclassing mechanics and would rather see them replaced with some other system actually designed for gaining cross-class abilities but that’s me, my actual point is how would you intend for these ‘novice levels’ to interact with multiclassing if everyone starts at 3rd...

ah.

i do not have the best knowledge of worldwide cities, i was grasping for whatever my brain could reach 😅

did they? i was under the quite distinct impression that they used 'powers' which are a significantly differently designed structure of mechanics from 5e's 'spells' to me, saying 5e can use 'spells' because '4e did it' is like saying a rugby/american football helmet with the open grill face...

Honestly I think there already exists most of the tools a warlord needs to exist in 5e, they’re just scattered across various classes, like, paladin auras, healing word, bardic inspiration, protection/interception fighting styles, an appropriate selection from the BM manoeuvres, there are feats...

But it’s weird that I just so happen to know someone who lives there in basically every single location we visit right? It’s not that your character can go to London and know someone in the area, it’s that they can go to London, Paris, Belgium, New York, Toronto, Tokyo or even a space colony and...

I guess that means my rogue should start committing crimes and stealing from everyone including the party then, given its impossible to get those connotations away from the word that’s their class name too right?

im sure we could trim out enough spells for three pages of space for the warlord, and the game would probably be better for them being gone.

why do we need half the classes? sorcerer and warlock? we've got wizard! get rid of em! bard? just give a rogue a musical instrument! druid? nah, nature cleric's right there! just throw them all in the trash, our classes don't need nuance or distinct playstyles, get rid of all the spells and...