Well, I have my own theories on this matter, and the possible connection to Dr. Hubris, but I'll not speak out without a bit more circumstantial evidence. Best to "wait for the signs to manifest" as it were :]
So then if Phaedra's sister is like that, then the brother is rolling with the Hardheads, right?
Now is that really going to stop us at this point? *eyes most recent SH entries* :D
Wow.
1) I still like A'kin.
2) Nerath is a character, and absolutely makes sense as the next step of that particular post. And yes, I'm aware of the details vis-a-vis his assumption of it. Just makes it all the more... I want to say inappropriately appropriate?
3) "The sane one"?!
Presumably, yes. I'd rule it that way. And if she died, she'd wake back up in her real body and be back to her old tricks.
Because taking an Archfiend - even a petrified one - into Sigil is bending the "no gods" rule, and most people aren't comfortable bending that particular class of rule. ;)
It's always struck me as a natural effect of the Rule of Threes. Every action's equal and opposite reaction would logically come out to be a "mockery" of its counterpart.
Surprising how easy it is to do that. Part of what gives them their influence, methinks.
Why would he care? The slide served its purpose: to give his forces a sudden, ridiculously powerful boost in the war over the Wasting Tower. He doesn't need Belarian anymore, so I don't think he'd really...