The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
D&D is deeply balkanized within WotC. I'm pretty sure that the "VTT team" and the "D&D Beyond team" are under the same umbrella, but they are organizationally separate from the D&D Book team, i.e. the game design folks everyone here knows who makes the actual D&D content. The VTT/D&DB managers...
This is what I was pointing at, replies like this.
The RFC guys clearly have some sort of inside track with WotC and are getting information as a result. They're saying that D&D and WotC are in trouble. You've probably got no inside information and are trying to read the infamously opaque tea...
You're the guy who maintains the thread analyzing D&D's Amazon rankings and concluding that D&D's sales haven't flagged in years. D&D book sales have tanked and will continue to do so in 2024.
Ah, I'm wrong on that part of it, then. RFC reports that they spent a lot of time talking to Cao and some other D&DB designer. They may have bought a ticket like everyone else, but they probably got more attention than everyone else.
I stand by most of the rest of what I sad. RFC's being...
Just because they're selling more doesn't mean they aren't losing money. And I disagree that they're selling more.
This is an opportunistic marriage of convenience between the D&DB team - who operate largely independent of the D&D books team - and RFC. The acquisition of D&DB blew a $140m-ish...
I feel the same way. To gloss over Roll For Combat's brand of outrage farming because you want the D&D team to succeed is shortsighted.
It should be clear to everyone who paid attention during the OGL disaster that someone inside the D&D team was feeding information to Roll For Combat. Now that...
You can get a sense of the size of the team from the credits page of any recent 5e book. A lot of those credits are for artists or production folks, like the people who actually do layout for the physical books. The design team itself, the people who design the game, is probably...fifteen-ish...
I appreciate the generosity behind this, but playtesting against what, exactly? After all, if the old and new editions are meant to be compatible, then that compatibility should flow backwards from the monsters, too. The new edition's monsters should be balanced/playable/whatever against PCs...
The guy who draws maps for D&D may know some people who work on D&D, but his claim is ludicrous on its face.
How many copies of Tasha's - a single 5e book that's not a core book - do you think WotC printed?
How many copies of all 4e books ever published were printed? Keep in mind that this...
They are trying to save face internally, not with the fans.
Right, so why is the current D&D team trying to blame the printers more than a year in advance? Their second justification in the Polygon article is more consistent with their PR messaging: these editions are interchangeable, so it's...
They are behind schedule on the design front and need the extra time to actually write the new MM and DMG. They save face by framing it as a printing problem, not a product development problem.