Recent content by Teo Twawki

If it isn't written using rods, chains, and furlongs, it is an utterly incomprehensible rpg to me.

My brain: dontsaycharlotte•dontsaycharlotte•dontsaycharlotte 😝 My mouth: Charlotte? :D

The times I've been involved with Self-as-Character characters, we've had two different methods of doing so. 1) The entire table takes part in statting other players' characters; unless it is something evident or obvious, the player's cannot stat themself. 2) Players stat their own characters...

Good thing Vincent Baker cannot gate-keep the creative scaffolding that are character sheets at our table. But we could also turn around and say--with much more accuracy and validity--that Mr Baker is useless when it comes to our gaming. :p

We ran an old CoC scenario with Hard City characters. To steal a tag line: Raymond Chandler meets The Exorcist. Great game. Osprey is quietly building a wonderful rpg catalog.

There's a little restaurant in Sarajevo that's owned by a farm that produces the dairy, meats, and vegetables served there. In the spectrum of food service industry, it's the antithesis of everything that is Arby's.

There must be d6+1 of them still remaining.

Nephilim.

[ampersands not in word count] Bunnies & Burrows with Orcas & Octopuses.

I attempted a similar line of philosophy with my Ph.D panel.

Some posters don't like legitimate criticism of their unfounded bashing.

A majority of time as an editor, I merely hoped to encounter a writer who didn't make me dive into a pail of gin. :oops:

This statement is self-reflective of its commenter.

These two comments seems incredibly incongruous. If you don't know the facts, what makes you think the truth is being embellished?

Completely agree. I've been a story and line editor in my time (for fiction, journalism, and academic articles) and this piece reads wonderfully. Unless something can be pointed out specifically, the complaint sounds more like someone soapboxing a defensive gripe than offering legitimate criticism.