Like yourself? You made claims as to what I was talking about and then when I say your are wrong about what I wrote you insult me?! Really, that is the discourse here?
My comment was just letting you know you're misrepresenting my statement or, at the very least, the intent of my statement. If...
See, for me, as a fan of the picture, I’m encouraged by this. I Always like taking old things and looking at them in new way. That’s a huge fun of D&D for me.
I do want to be clear that I do not care whether is a man or a woman. I grew up thinking it was a man, and I’m fine now thinking of it as a woman. And I’m also fine with still thinking it is a man!
I mean, when we are talking about “magic” is there any real difference between gaming and simulation? I mean magic exists just for the game, it can’t really simulate anything
That order makes the most sense of anything proposed. Like @Henadic Theologian said, it isn’t a precise science, but this classification is at least logical!
Sure, but you’re fighting against simple math which seems a bit silly to me. It is a bit like calling Tom Cruise the tallest movie star when the Rock is standing right next to him.
I don’t know how you can possibly justify that; however, if that is true, how do you justify the 2024 rules changes only bring half as important than Tasha’s
Yet I’ve played 5e since about 2 months after launch and never stepped foot in the realms.
Adventures , IMO & IME don’t make something default - core books do.
I have more people talk about it being the example setting in the DMG, that does not make it the default setting. I imagine that will continue to be the multiverse as it has been for this edition