airwalkrr
Adventurer
This has been beat to death in previous threads I am sure. It is a question as old as the game itself since both spells are as old as the game itself. My groups have always played with the assumption that magic missile cannot target the images of a mirror image spell. The only way a magic missile could be effective is if you get lucky. Alternately, assuming there are four images and one caster, you could guarantee 1d4+1 point of damage by tossing one missile at each.
Despite the fact that this is the way my first DMs ruled it and the way I have always ruled it since, I often have players dispute it. They claim magic missile should be able to destroy images. I counter that 1) only effects that require an attack roll can destroy images and magic missile does not require an attack roll, 2) a magic missile is ineffective against an illusion like a silent image, so it would not be effective against an illusory image of the caster either, 3) magic missile targets only living creatures and an illusory image is not a creature so a magic missile aimed at an image would have the same effect as a magic missile aimed at a brick.
What do you think? Have I missed something or are my players just being munchkins?
Despite the fact that this is the way my first DMs ruled it and the way I have always ruled it since, I often have players dispute it. They claim magic missile should be able to destroy images. I counter that 1) only effects that require an attack roll can destroy images and magic missile does not require an attack roll, 2) a magic missile is ineffective against an illusion like a silent image, so it would not be effective against an illusory image of the caster either, 3) magic missile targets only living creatures and an illusory image is not a creature so a magic missile aimed at an image would have the same effect as a magic missile aimed at a brick.
What do you think? Have I missed something or are my players just being munchkins?