I also object to this objection. I believe this "cheerleading", as you call it, comes directly from the DDXP source material. It also serves to draw attention to important changes between 3.5 and 4E, and as such is useful.David Argall said:I will note, and object, that a number of the blue section titles amount to saying "Wow! 4.0 is so much better than 3.5."
Could we remove the cheerleading? It certainly won't be a part of the actual books.
Fifth Element said:To Verys: Please keep the "cheerleading". You should stick as close to the source material as possible.
My point in positive versus negative.drjones said:Also this is not a journalistic exercise. If someone else wants to put the work into compiling '4E Players Handbook Which Totally Sucks Because 3rd Is Way Better And Everyone Knows It But Here Is Your Dumb 4E Junk Anyway' they are entirely welcome to.
Green Knight said:The ones on the Wizards site are revised versions with mistakes corrected. So yeah, Ray of Frost is an Encounter Power.
So you're saying the sheets WotC put up themselves, on their own site, after DDXP, are the erroneous ones?Kirnon_Bhale said:I disagree. If this were the case it would make the Human extra class at will leaps and bounds better then the Halfelfs cross class ability.
It is easy to see that At will abilities are MUCH weaker then encounter ones. You would never use it.
Do you have the reference from WoTC regarding revising the sheets?
It's easy enough to make the mistake. If they were putting corrected sheets up then they would have put up the fixed Paladin's Challenge as well.withak said:So you're saying the sheets WotC put up themselves, on their own site, after DDXP, are the erroneous ones?
That makes no sense.