travathian
First Post
Based on reading the 5E PHB spell Clone and the MM listing for the Lich, it would seem possible for a Lich to have a clone.
Key wording:
"At any time after the clone matures, if the original creatures dies, its soul transfers to the clone, provided that the soul is free and willing."
The tricky part is the wording of the Lich in the MM:
"The wizard falls dead, then rises as a lich as its soul is drawn into the phylactery, where it forever remains."
"Because the destruction of its phylactery means the possibility of eternal death . . ."
1) Wizard creates clone
2) Wizard creates phylactery
3) Wizard undergoes the lichedom process, and wills its soul go to the phylactery, not the clone
4) Wizard lich now has a phylactery with a soul in it, and should it be destroyed, the soul can willingly go to the clone
Arguments both for and against that I have come up with so far:
FOR: Clone is clearly worded that the clone remains viable forever, assuming it isnt disturbed, so the potential long life of the lich isn't an issue.
FOR: Clone states the soul must be free and willing, implying that the soul has a choice in the matter, and thus chose the phylactery over the clone.
FOR: The "eternal death" wording above reasons that the lich would 'die' if its phylactery were destroyed, thus triggering the wording in the clone spell.
FOR/AGAINST: The soul in a phylactery could be interpreted as being destroyed when the phylactery is destroyed, but the word "possibility" leaves it open that maybe it isn't?
AGAINST: It could be interpreted that upon death, if the soul doesn't go into the clone, that the clone now becomes non-viable.
AGAINST: Liches are psychotic, and wouldn't want to have their soul go back into a flesh and blood body, or if they did, might go completely off the hook when it happens.
Now we have a wizard who creates a clone, undergoes lichedom. Said lich then takes clone to super secret hiding spot. Within super secret hiding spot, the lich leaves: backup spell book, components to make a clone, supplies/spells to survive 120 days in hiding spot, magic items, a phylactery, components to undergo lichedom.
Finally, a lich that has to be killed, its phylactery destroyed, and its clone located within 120 days, or the lich rises yet again . . . with another clone.
In previous editions this was tougher due to the wordings, but 5E seems to make it perfectly viable.
Thoughts?
Key wording:
"At any time after the clone matures, if the original creatures dies, its soul transfers to the clone, provided that the soul is free and willing."
The tricky part is the wording of the Lich in the MM:
"The wizard falls dead, then rises as a lich as its soul is drawn into the phylactery, where it forever remains."
"Because the destruction of its phylactery means the possibility of eternal death . . ."
1) Wizard creates clone
2) Wizard creates phylactery
3) Wizard undergoes the lichedom process, and wills its soul go to the phylactery, not the clone
4) Wizard lich now has a phylactery with a soul in it, and should it be destroyed, the soul can willingly go to the clone
Arguments both for and against that I have come up with so far:
FOR: Clone is clearly worded that the clone remains viable forever, assuming it isnt disturbed, so the potential long life of the lich isn't an issue.
FOR: Clone states the soul must be free and willing, implying that the soul has a choice in the matter, and thus chose the phylactery over the clone.
FOR: The "eternal death" wording above reasons that the lich would 'die' if its phylactery were destroyed, thus triggering the wording in the clone spell.
FOR/AGAINST: The soul in a phylactery could be interpreted as being destroyed when the phylactery is destroyed, but the word "possibility" leaves it open that maybe it isn't?
AGAINST: It could be interpreted that upon death, if the soul doesn't go into the clone, that the clone now becomes non-viable.
AGAINST: Liches are psychotic, and wouldn't want to have their soul go back into a flesh and blood body, or if they did, might go completely off the hook when it happens.
Now we have a wizard who creates a clone, undergoes lichedom. Said lich then takes clone to super secret hiding spot. Within super secret hiding spot, the lich leaves: backup spell book, components to make a clone, supplies/spells to survive 120 days in hiding spot, magic items, a phylactery, components to undergo lichedom.
Finally, a lich that has to be killed, its phylactery destroyed, and its clone located within 120 days, or the lich rises yet again . . . with another clone.
In previous editions this was tougher due to the wordings, but 5E seems to make it perfectly viable.
Thoughts?