Jeremy Ackerman-Yost
Explorer
Can't take any credit for it. Stole it from Dunsany's Pegana books.Yair said:Actually, Canis, that is a cool option I really like.
Oh, I was being hyperbolic, of course. Even recklessly so, perhaps But when you break it down far enough there are fewer scientific facts than we like to think and a lot more theories. We just can't observe at the level necessary to move things into the realm of fact.I strongly disagree about science being subject to change. No significant physical fact (as opposed to physical theory!) has been disproved, ever - rules are refined, not thrown out without concern for complimentarity. And, for that matter, no quantum physicist has been able to dispute a fundumental physical theory for about 30 years (well, except a small refinement some 7 years ago).
That's the story of my professional life, actually. :\
That's a function of needing to keep the game rules-based, and is actually the most irritating disconnect between fantasy games and fantasy literature, IMO.And I agree with Andor that magic CAN be based will and hence unscientific, but in a roleplaying game it usually ain't.
btw, The_Universe IS the dream of a sleeping god, and he's just upset I blew his cover