Warren Okuma
First Post
Sure Dannyalcatraz. I just talked to my cousin. It seems that he built a compression ignition engine. Weird. Sorry about the confusion. I told you he wasn't too smart. Air when it gets compressed gets hot.Dannyalcatraz said:Before responding, I do have a question about the early crank engines, Okuma.
I can understand that a crank engine sparks fuel in the chamber on startup, but how does it work with only steel? As I recall, steel on steel doesn't spark well. What is the actual sparking mechanism?
http://www.firepiston.com/
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Herbert_Akroyd_Stuart
All my friends that I know that yeast makes alcohol. And that lots of people know that alcohol boils at a lower temperature than water so it boils first. And when hot vapor cools it condenses. All you need is a copper tube, to cool the alcohol laden steam, (water optional) and a bucket to collect your alcohol. Repeat to purify. I suspect that there will be hundreds of thousands that know this surviving. Everyone in my High School and college chemistry classes knows how. Look all basic techs are as easy as this. Isn't moonshine stills in Texas in the rural areas?Dannyalcatraz said:Personally, I can't really do either...and one of my Great Uncles makes his own 'shine. (I know I'm a dissapointment.) I mean, I know the general ingredients, but not the process.
I suspect few people actually possess that knowledge.
Add yeast. Wait ten days. Boil. Alcohol boils first. Cool steam. Repeat to purify. How simple is that?
For the best results, you first boil the corn or feed. This kills the all unwanted microorganisms. Let it cool. Add yeast. Let ferment for ten days or until the mixture stops bubbling. Boil, and funnel the evaporating alcohol and water into your cooling rig. The initial boil is alcohol. When the mixture stops boiling it's almost out of alcohol so stop. Cool the steam by running it though a tube of copper (you can use iron if you do not intend to drink it) a water bath is best, but not necessary and to purify distil it again. Three boils and you have 91%+ (182 proof) alcohol. Ahem. Or so I read. Yup. And behold! If you survive you will have the knowledge to help rebuild civilization.
Wow. You're right. There are tons of people working micro coal claims. Been looking at some micro coal pockets mining claims. Very interesting.Dannyalcatraz said:I studied the Oil & Gas industry as part of my education at UT Austin School of Law under Ernest Smith ( http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/profiles.php ), including the details of what makes a mine profitable, secondary & tertiary recovery methods, etc.
According to him, even small deposits get worked by someone if they're near the surface or otherwise easily recoverable. There is always a company/community/person for whom mining such a deposit would make economic sense.
Correct. One third of all mines in the United States are surface mines, strip or logwalling. And most of the underground mines have backup generators as safety features so can operate post starfall. I didn't realize so many coal mines had back up multiple generators. These mine operators keep a very ruthless schedule.Dannyalcatraz said:Most O&G mines are not surface mines.
http://www.getenergysmart.org/Files/Schools/FactSheets/Coal.PDF
Oh indeed it is. To get the 90% most of the casualties will be in California and New York and other heavily populated coastal cities due to tidal waves from underwater avalanches and earthquakes. Texas should be close to 90% with the entire coast wiped and many cities smashed. And you can drop anywhere from 1000 rocks to 30,000 depending on the model you uses otherwise you will get uncontrolled global warming. You do believe in global warming is caused by CO2 at least a little right? 30K of rocks produce a lot of burning.Dannyalcatraz said:90% casualties overall- distribution of survivors would be lumpy, not evenly spread. Cities would be flattened (well, cratered, really) but rural areas would be relatively untouched, so casualties in and nearby cities would be basically 100%, but in rural areas, possibly as little as 10%.
So the problem remains.
Its not a question of impact modelling.
The future? So are they coming with powered armor, tanks and stuff?Dannyalcatraz said:The Illithids are coming from the future with a plan to utterly destroy the surface civilization, leaving only enough people for thralls & snacktime.
And most importantly does not cause runaway global warming from burning cities. One half of the hit is nuclear winter, but after three years it's nuclear summer due to the enormous CO2 being released from the burning cities. Being on Venus like world sucks.Dannyalcatraz said:Thus they will know how many and will use as many rocks as it takes to do the job of thoroughly annihilating the cities & major targets of the surface world..
And small towns, and some small colleges, and unpleasant often industries. And small town libraries.Dannyalcatraz said:Your list made me think about skewed demographics. Given that rural areas would be fairly untouched, many modern nations would find themselves in a situation in which the bulk of survivors would be:
1) Farmers, Ranchers & survivalists who live out there most of the time...
and
2) Outdoorsmen and others who vacation out there, including a disproportionate number of wealthy & politicians. Which reminds me of Douglas Adams's books...
tart up the oil wells.
So... no clerics in this world? None? No high level clerics? No gods? Please clarify.Dannyalcatraz said:No, as per Lords of Madness, Illithids don't exist at all in the here and now until they come back in time and start trying to hasten the rise of their kind in the future.
In this campaign, that will be right after the ELE.
And how many people in authority or power actually take them seriously enough to do anything about the impending UFO/Bigfoot Invasion?
The point is that historically, oracles are seldom given credence. In a fantasy world, there would be more people who did so, but the question is how many and what could/would they do?
NEO's it's up to 80% detected. Really.Dannyalcatraz said:Just drawing from current reality- we currently have more observational power than ever before, and yet we still have cataloged fewer than 1% of objects capable of ending life on Earth...
http://www.ll.mit.edu/LINEAR/
90% chance of detecting an asteroid that will hit in ten years. And they have 30,000 spot checks.Dannyalcatraz said:AND most of what we've detected we can't do anything about because we:
1) Lack the tech
and/or
2) Haven't detected them at a range at which we could do something usefeul about them IF we have the tech.
Ten years is a lot.
Last edited: