Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Alternative Initiative: try this
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fabio Andrea Rossi" data-source="post: 6631584" data-attributes="member: 67378"><p>Hi all, I just wanted to share a different method we used last Friday to manage Initiative. It worked really well, better than expected, so I wanted to share it to see if someone else may enjoy it. </p><p> </p><p>It brings back the “initiative rolled each round” without the rolling & math part, and without need to put everybody in order (the main reason why I don’t do this each round), adding sensible tension to the table. It is meant to make combats unpredictable and increase Players’ involvement and attention during the combat, at the same time deleting the need to track initiatives results.</p><p> </p><p>This system comes from one of our player thinkering over Savage Worlds cards system. It isn’t slower, in fact it may be quicker, as there will no more be needed the guy who says “now playing: the wizard, next is the Fighter.” </p><p> </p><p>The method use Tarots or similar cards with evocative images. It works with standard playing cards too, but we found a strange excitement in players seeing their card showing up.</p><p> </p><p>How it works? Like this:</p><p> </p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Choose one card to represent each player character;</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Add a bunch for monsters to use during the night; I used a Big Bad Monster, Mean Mininons, Witch and similar art to represent main monster kinds);</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Mix the card and put the deck in a place where everybody can see it;</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Draw first card: it’s that character turn;</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Draw second card: it’s now that character turn;</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">And so on. Mix the cards each end of round and repeat.</li> </ul><p></p><p>The biggest effect is that everybody is on his toes and everybody is closely following the action as the next guy could be you. Tactical challenge is higher: as you never know who will go next, players (and monsters) won’t be able to synergize by making tactics that rely on knowing who’s next. For some goup, this may be an hindrance, to me and my players (some of which are the tactical kind) it’s instead a big feature, as it becomes more of a tactical challenge to choose what you do in a changing environment. </p><p> </p><p>For instance, no more situations like “ok, it’s three of us before the Behir acts, I’ll cast Hold Monster so if it does not work we still have 2 turns before him” or “Jeff is down dying but no monster acting before the cleric so I’ll keep my potion of healing and attack”.</p><p> </p><p>There are a couple drawbacks: first, due to effects that last “until the end of your next turn”. In a standard game, it always last one full round. In this scenario, it may be longer or shorter depending on draw order, which is random. But, it will always last one round for the creature, so this (which was our main doubt) proved at the table to be a non-issue. Yes, sometime it will be more advantageous and some times less so. To us, the advantage of the system so far proved much more enjoyable than the drawbacks. </p><p> </p><p>For example: a “shield” spell may protect the caster from more attacks or less attacks than in a standard game, but in the long run who cares, it’s the same for monsters and it will even out with time.</p><p> </p><p>The other main drawback is that Dexterity, Feats and Spells impacting on initiatives are not accounted for. Once again, for us (even the 20 Dex guy) it’s a sacrifice worth making. First, Monsters too won’t use these modifiers so it’s not that bad, it’s only bad relative to the very good initiative Characters. Bad initiative characters will benefit from this. What we ruled is that if a charcater gets the ALERT feat (only, as the +5 init. is big in that FEAT core) the character will get 2 cards and act on the first draw.</p><p> </p><p>This has been just a single experimente who worked very well at the table, more issues (or benefits) may show up. I really feared mesing around with the combat flow but instead this proved to be fast, furious and much more fun, also for the DM aka me.</p><p> </p><p>For now, it gave back to our table a fresh air of tension to the combats, try this and tell me how it work for you!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fabio Andrea Rossi, post: 6631584, member: 67378"] Hi all, I just wanted to share a different method we used last Friday to manage Initiative. It worked really well, better than expected, so I wanted to share it to see if someone else may enjoy it. It brings back the “initiative rolled each round” without the rolling & math part, and without need to put everybody in order (the main reason why I don’t do this each round), adding sensible tension to the table. It is meant to make combats unpredictable and increase Players’ involvement and attention during the combat, at the same time deleting the need to track initiatives results. This system comes from one of our player thinkering over Savage Worlds cards system. It isn’t slower, in fact it may be quicker, as there will no more be needed the guy who says “now playing: the wizard, next is the Fighter.” The method use Tarots or similar cards with evocative images. It works with standard playing cards too, but we found a strange excitement in players seeing their card showing up. How it works? Like this: [LIST] [*]Choose one card to represent each player character; [*]Add a bunch for monsters to use during the night; I used a Big Bad Monster, Mean Mininons, Witch and similar art to represent main monster kinds); [*]Mix the card and put the deck in a place where everybody can see it; [*]Draw first card: it’s that character turn; [*]Draw second card: it’s now that character turn; [*]And so on. Mix the cards each end of round and repeat. [/LIST] The biggest effect is that everybody is on his toes and everybody is closely following the action as the next guy could be you. Tactical challenge is higher: as you never know who will go next, players (and monsters) won’t be able to synergize by making tactics that rely on knowing who’s next. For some goup, this may be an hindrance, to me and my players (some of which are the tactical kind) it’s instead a big feature, as it becomes more of a tactical challenge to choose what you do in a changing environment. For instance, no more situations like “ok, it’s three of us before the Behir acts, I’ll cast Hold Monster so if it does not work we still have 2 turns before him” or “Jeff is down dying but no monster acting before the cleric so I’ll keep my potion of healing and attack”. There are a couple drawbacks: first, due to effects that last “until the end of your next turn”. In a standard game, it always last one full round. In this scenario, it may be longer or shorter depending on draw order, which is random. But, it will always last one round for the creature, so this (which was our main doubt) proved at the table to be a non-issue. Yes, sometime it will be more advantageous and some times less so. To us, the advantage of the system so far proved much more enjoyable than the drawbacks. For example: a “shield” spell may protect the caster from more attacks or less attacks than in a standard game, but in the long run who cares, it’s the same for monsters and it will even out with time. The other main drawback is that Dexterity, Feats and Spells impacting on initiatives are not accounted for. Once again, for us (even the 20 Dex guy) it’s a sacrifice worth making. First, Monsters too won’t use these modifiers so it’s not that bad, it’s only bad relative to the very good initiative Characters. Bad initiative characters will benefit from this. What we ruled is that if a charcater gets the ALERT feat (only, as the +5 init. is big in that FEAT core) the character will get 2 cards and act on the first draw. This has been just a single experimente who worked very well at the table, more issues (or benefits) may show up. I really feared mesing around with the combat flow but instead this proved to be fast, furious and much more fun, also for the DM aka me. For now, it gave back to our table a fresh air of tension to the combats, try this and tell me how it work for you! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Alternative Initiative: try this
Top