Total coincidence alert: walking into a restaurant post-church today, another patron was walking out wearing a ninja sloth t-shirt.
For the record, "teh Interwebz" is a thing. (Or was...apparently it peaked around 2012.)
For the record, "teh Interwebz" is a thing. (Or was...apparently it peaked around 2012.)
Total coincidence alert: walking into a restaurant post-church today, another patron was walking out wearing a ninja sloth t-shirt.
I fully agree, the Internet really peaked as a thing around 2012 and has been sliding downhill ever since...
I am not saying others cannot or should not do it or interpret them that way. However I would not allow it a game that I am running. For the Three Musketeers and Wesley, I would rule that the oaths falls under ideals and bonds rather than Paladin oaths, because, as you pointed out, they are not doing spell stuff. For Luke, I can see it inspiring a Paladin like order, but to me the Jedi stuff falls more under a psionic or arcane warrior or even a weapon using monk with semi-religious or philosophical overtones. Assuming, there is a jedi influenced order, I as the DM would decide how I want them represented.
For the record, "teh Interwebz" is a thing. (Or was...apparently it peaked around 2012.)
Total coincidence alert: walking into a restaurant post-church today, another patron was walking out wearing a ninja sloth t-shirt.
Meh. I'm far too lazy. The player comes up with that stuff and calls it a paladin? Fantastic. He now gets homework developing his order and how it works in the world.
Ownership over the world is never one of my priorities.