• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

Awaken a treant


log in or register to remove this ad


Methinkus

First Post
Of course a treant is a plant, otherwise it couldnt be a tree. It is a type of plant commonly known as a tree. Dont get so hung up on labels, is my advice. I say go for it; it would be cool to have something like that owe the PC's a favor :cool:
 

IanB

First Post
A treant already can move, already has mental ability scores, already speaks several languages... and isn't a tree, so not only would casting the spell on a treant have no effect since it already has all the qualities the spell grants, it also isn't a legal target for the spell.

Why would you want to spend 250 xp and an entire day casting a spell on changing a treant's attitude to 'friendly' (-if- you make a will save), which is what the spell effect boils down to if the treant is considered a legal target?
 
Last edited:

Oni

First Post
The spell never once mentions that it affects plants, only animals and trees specifically. A treant as much as it may look like a tree is not a tree, and its descriptor is plant so it is not an animal. As it is neither of these things it is not a viable target for Awaken.
 

Methinkus

First Post
A treant is not a magical creature in any way. It is a plant. Specifically, it is a tree. It is a type of tree that does not exist in the real world obviously, but in the magical world of D&D, it is a “huge plant.” It says so right there in the monstrous manual just below “TREANT”

That’s right folks, a plant. Now, “plant” is in fact a broad term used in this game for classification, and can be divided into sub-categories like flower, tree, or weed. The treant is very clearly a type of tree, with trees being described as “A woody perennial plant having a single usually elongate main stem generally with few or no branches on its lower part,” by Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. The Treant in Monstrous Manuel fits this description nicely. Its is a tree.

As such it is a legal target for the Awaken spell, which would immediately add 2hit dice and d3 charisma, and someone would have to roll 3d6 to find out its new intelligence score, which may be more or less than the standard 12.
 

Mal Malenkirk

First Post
Methinkus said:
As such it is a legal target for the Awaken spell, which would immediately add 2hit dice and d3 charisma, and someone would have to roll 3d6 to find out its new intelligence score, which may be more or less than the standard 12.

No. This is what happens to an animal. Reread the spell.
 
Last edited:

IanB

First Post
A treant is not a magical creature in any way. It is a plant. Specifically, it is a tree.

From the Monster Manual:

"Treants combine features of trees and humans... Treants are almost indistinguishable from trees."

As you can see - not trees. Just very close. They cannot benefit from the Awaken spell.
 

Henry

Autoexreginated
No offense meant, but I can't believe someone came up with this. Awaken is a spell for imbuing non-sentient creatures with sentience. A Treant is sentient already. It cannot be Awakened - it already IS awakened.

Or do all trees in D&D have that many hit dice, and a charisma score?

But, if you want to take the logistical approach...

The logic doesn't hold that a treant is a tree. The spell affects trees. A tree is a plant. A treant is a plant. But it does NOT follow that a treant is a tree.

A Goblin is a humanoid. An orc is a humanoid. But does that mean that an Orc-bane sword will do a goblin extra damage?
 
Last edited:

Kae'Yoss

First Post
No awaken on treants. Nowhere in any definition of the term "tree" I've heard there were something of "can move around" or "attacks those who hurt nature". A treant is no tree. Looking the same does not mean being the same.
 

Voidrunner's Codex

Remove ads

Top