Clearly he hasn't seen enough bad superhero movies, because that's way too harsh.
It is probably being called that because of the Afflectation.
Clearly he hasn't seen enough bad superhero movies, because that's way too harsh.
It is probably being called that because of the Afflectation.
He did not seem to share that view. "Worst on-screen of Batman since Clooney."
Why do we care?
Communicating is what people do. If we didn't care, critics wouldn't have a job. Spies, either. And people wouldn't gossip. Etc. and from those flawed sources, we make flawed judgements.
What it comes down to is gathering data and sorting it through your own filters. Nobody- no critic, no buddy, no dööd howling in the wilds of the Interwebz- can tell you if you will enjoy a particular film. All they can do is tell you what they observed and how they felt about it. It's up to you to to decide whether what they describe increases or decreases your desire to see a film.
So why did I bring up that guy on another board? Just to illustrate that it isn't just the critics giving BvS a resounding raspberry of a review.
So why did I bring up that guy on another board? Just to illustrate that it isn't just the critics giving BvS a resounding raspberry of a review.
so its bringing in audiences despite the critics